https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2187498/miller-v-johnson
In any event, it is obvious that plaintiff and the deceased had not been concerned with the legality of their actions and that plaintiff was merely shedding one husand and annexing another with only token propriety. Her views were well illustrated in one of her answers to the judge; "Well, I am afraid, your Honor, you get my husbands mixed up. I've got so many of them."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Normal, average foid
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Whores. Whores never change.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Snapshots:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context