Unable to load image
Reported by:
  • DickButtKiss : Support your fellow women dont b a mean girl

It happened to me: My OnlyFans Content Leaked. I Learned a Bleak Truth About the Internet.

https://slate.com/technology/2024/11/onlyfans-content-stolen-privacy-security-internet-dark-side.html

It never, ever feels less violating. It's upsetting," said Siri Dahl, a popular adult film actress and advocate for performers' rights, when I interviewed her for my podcast. Early in her career, Dahl noticed behind-the-paywall selfies pop up in tube-site ads for "predatory, weird, fake dating sites." Adding insult to injury, one of the ads using her stolen photo was captioned "Frick hot old chubby MILFs right now." At the time, she had just turned 24.

:mjlol:

My thief had made off with a huge archive of over three years' worth of content, mostly photos with a handful of videos. It was devastating to learn that the thief was one of my subscribers—they were supposed to be a fan, not a menace. I had a fox in my henhouse. I felt totally exposed.

You really think someone would do that? Just go on the internet and download porn? :marseypearlclutch:

I'm sure this sucks for her and piracy is a real problem for any kind of internet creator, but right-click is not exactly a shocking new online development.

My piracy experience took me back to 2008, when I was a frustrated actor who finally snagged a decent-paying gig teaching at a camp for med school–destined high school kids. I was doing a great job, the kids loved me—maybe too much, because they looked me up on the internet, and then I got fired for having my boobs on the internet. It wasn't even porn: It was topless screen grabs from an artsy independent film I'd starred in a few years prior.

>gets burned once by nudes on the internet :marseyraging:

>better post more nudes :marseyclueless:

166
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"It's wild because the culture around piracy is [such that] it's very rare that the people who steal my content on OnlyFans are actually trying to sell it somewhere else for profit," Dahl explained. "It's just misogyny, is what it is. It's like, I don't like the fact that this woman is making a living doing this, so I want to degrade her by giving it away."

I had naively assumed that because I wasn't a porn star or a celebrity, no one would want to leak my content—but that's not the case. "It's like a badge of pride if they can leak content from a lesser-known model," Dahl explained. "It's like, Ooh, I discovered her. A lot of them also think, Oh, I'm helping her. She's becoming more popular because I'm putting her on sites where she wasn't going to be seen otherwise."

The article is all over the place. These 2 paragraphs are literally right next to each other but they clearly contradict each other. The first paragraph says that people who share her stuff for free must be misogynists who don't think she deserves to get paid and the second paragraph says people share her stuff for free because they think it helps her.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.