PatriarchLand/lord
Patriarch of Dramastan
3mo ago#7344087
spent 0 currency on pings
A lot of women find out they are better off when they are in control of their finances. I was shocked at how fast money piled up when my ex wasn't spending it. I don't know what he was spending it on. We didn't live extravagantly at all.
Women tend to be financially worse off 5 years after a marriage while men report being better than ever
It's like saying Adele's money from her music career that went to her husband wasn't hers since they were a couple when she earned it. The argument is based around the legalese concept of the couple as a unit but the source of that concept in the first place comes from the idea that they both contributed equally.
See this only works if the other party can prove they gave up something of equal opportunity cost. Like hypothetically if Adele's husband was an acclaimed singer that gave up his potential superstar career for his wife then you might be able to make that argument. But the opportunity cost has to legitimately exist otherwise if it was about inventing any best case scenario you could turn it around by saying that if the other party was living independently they'd actually would have been far worse off in terms of personal and financial development, which would make them the ones that owe monthly alimony to the richer party instead.
No-fault divorce should be illegal. If I make a contract with someone, I can't get out of said contract without paying a penalty or if there is a fault in the contract or its execution, but somehow in divorce this fundamental principle goes out the window, because foids.
I'm on a "no fault" divorce where my wife has r*ped, assaulted me with a knife and killed our dog and threatened to kill me and I still don't deserve to see my kids
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Women tend to be financially worse off 5 years after a marriage while men report being better than ever
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's cause they buy lots of dumb shit
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
/u/anon5432167890 You're a gold digging whore and deserve nothing.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Literally doesn't exist. He has no money. He's gonna get half the money from the dissolving couple.
He's getting money, not losing money.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Semantics, Grusey.
It's like saying Adele's money from her music career that went to her husband wasn't hers since they were a couple when she earned it. The argument is based around the legalese concept of the couple as a unit but the source of that concept in the first place comes from the idea that they both contributed equally.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, it's from the opportunity cost of marrying vs independent living and personal development.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
See this only works if the other party can prove they gave up something of equal opportunity cost. Like hypothetically if Adele's husband was an acclaimed singer that gave up his potential superstar career for his wife then you might be able to make that argument. But the opportunity cost has to legitimately exist otherwise if it was about inventing any best case scenario you could turn it around by saying that if the other party was living independently they'd actually would have been far worse off in terms of personal and financial development, which would make them the ones that owe monthly alimony to the richer party instead.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Source?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Shut up
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
No-fault divorce should be illegal. If I make a contract with someone, I can't get out of said contract without paying a penalty or if there is a fault in the contract or its execution, but somehow in divorce this fundamental principle goes out the window, because foids.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm on a "no fault" divorce where my wife has r*ped, assaulted me with a knife and killed our dog and threatened to kill me and I still don't deserve to see my kids
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Should've r*ped her right back, that'll learn her.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's not my fault she cheated on me, I can't control what she does with her body
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The words of a weak husband who earned the wages of weakness.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I work as a s*x-worker and it's not my fault my wife saw my pictures online or whatever
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Edit: Guys this post made it to some weird site where men are talking about crushing our skulls because of this post.
Sigh "not all men"
Snapshots:
https://old.reddit.com/r/TwoXPreppers/comments/1gsth0y/divorce/:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context