https://old.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1hsxz0b/so_what_exactly_is_the_feminist_plan_for_the/
/h/toomanyxchromosomes
BipocCuteTwinkR-slur
Tik/tok
2mo ago
(reddit.com)
2,667 thread views
#330457
earned 556 coins from votes
2mo ago
(reddit.com)
2,667 thread views
#330457
earned 556 coins from votes
So what exactly is the feminist plan for the masses of angry young men that are forming? : AskFeminists
- 187
- 142
Top Poster of the Day:
911roofer
Current Registered Users: 31,258
isn't 1 more than enough
/h/toomanyxchromosomes SETTINGS /h/toomanyxchromosomes MODS /h/toomanyxchromosomes LOG /h/toomanyxchromosomes EXILEES /h/toomanyxchromosomes FOLLOWERS /h/toomanyxchromosomes BLOCKERS
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why are commies always such cute twinks with their intersectional bullshit.
/u/Commie_Diogenes types like you would be the first to go if there ever actually was a large scale culling. Luckily for you, and unfortunately for us, that's not ever going to happen because people are too complacent, no matter how much your hysteria induced social bubbles say otherwise.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's not intersectional; it's arguably worse. Their M.O. is to attach themselves to active causes and redirect (not combine in an intersectional way) the energy towards socialism, communism, and revolution as the "real" solutions. Their "feminism" invariably turns out to be "solving patriarchy through destroying capitalism."
The feminism is just the hook to get this community interested, and "i'm a guy" may either be biting that hook still or feeding it to others. This strategy/goal is explicitly laid out even starting with Marx, who considered any consciousness other than class consciousness to be a divider among those with revolutionary zeal.
!anticommunists
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More to the point, this isn't organic, this is literally the exact stuff the USSR/Russia has been pushing on the West for a century. Their goal isn't and has never been to actually get socialism to be implemented, they just want to give ammo to the enemies of their enemy - sow groomercord, that sort of stuff.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I dunno. Soviets take credit for anything, even decades later. It's partly socialist nonsense (ideology), but it's mainly postmodern crap from professors who early on loved socialism, but have subsided into lukewarm markets with a heavy hand of government types. There's no Marxist at the helm saying "sow groomercord." These postmodernists made the cowtools of groomercord; they simply don't understand the consequences and don't really care because their theory or side can never be wrong.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, but that's the clever bit, you don't need one, you just prod the already-existing groomercord a little bit, spend a few million bucks here and there on whoever is gaining the most traction, possibly without even they themselves knowing what's going on, and you get results. It's really easy to troll when your target is an entire country and you've got a budget of billions.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sounds like schizo nonsense, honestly. Much of this phenomena isn't centrally planned, but it's tidier and easier believing that it is.
!mottezans, psyops from the Soviet Union are why we have postmodern nonsense.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, if you're talking about Yuri Bezmenov. What I'm referring to is the Long Leash Policy involving artists.
It was just one aspect of the CIA trying to promote what they called the "Non-Communist Left".
The Soviets were not trying to promote competing leftist ideologies, in America or elsewhere. American intelligence figured out that by fostering their own, non-USSR style leftists they could prevent serious ideological incursions by Soviets.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Source? That honestly sounds really interesting.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
This is absolute complete bullshit. CIA was not telling artists what to make or paying the ones who made what they want. It was subsidizing the distribution of art from our homegrown and immigrant leftoids around the world to demonstrate that in America you have the freedom to be creative. Unlike the commie bloc where everything had to be "Socialist Realism": ugly, boring, r-slurred, and not cool. You've got one side that's not even paying these weirdos to make their queer paintings and stuff, and the other side where if you make a queer painting you'll get kicked out of school, fired from your job, and sent to harvest sugar beets on a collective farm in some depressing shithole.
Goddammit, I didn't realize you were joking.
Well I went to the trouble of typing out a paragraph so I'm gonna post it anyway.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
!schizomaxxxers, the CIA has invented postmodernism which is why we have woke nonsense!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's obvious to anyone who's seen the stuff the Soviets actually pushed. It was not this "intersectionality" bullshit meant to create coalitions of random activist groups. This was born from the American project to subvert Soviet leftist movements by creating alternative leftist movements that were fiercely ideologically opposed to each other. Groups like the Weather Underground and the Symbionese Liberation Army were just glowie ops filled with rich kids that died early or were integrated back into the mainstream political and academic structure. It worked pretty well vs rightoid groups too.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The issue is similar to many extremists: socially destructive efforts, expecting that they will fill the power vacuums left behind.
Socialists in Weimar Germany were only half disappointed at Nazis consolidating power because they reasoned that the Nazis would collapse -- and that power would be theirs to take afterward. They weren't wrong for half of Germany.
But there's also little difference between destruction to clear the way for taking power and destruction alone, and that makes many extremists useful idiots for foreign goals of destabilization.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Hitler was a progressive not an extremist.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Good point, feminism was a huge tool that USSR used to bash the west and dumb American and Euro libs ate it up
That plus homelessness which they solved through forced labour and jamming 10 people into a house
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I mean, technically yeah. But what actually happens is that instead of various activists being funneled into communism like a bait and switch, actual communist movements get taken over by activists who think communism is about gay trans BIPOC identity politics.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
They're fricking environmentalism for a generation with exactly this.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Now you know why first thing commies did was made other commies face !the wall. They got rid of twinks like that
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It is a foid pretending too be a moid. Look at how they write.
Jewish lives matter.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context