I went to all the effort of doxxing her using publicly available information to determine the provenance of the story and never even got an effort post award
It was only after I found out the man I had s*x with multiple times on the rooftop was not infact the office landlord and was really just the janitor that I realized I had been r*ped.
C'mon Jimie, don't act like you didn't read the part where she says black guys r*pe because of their anger towards whitoid oppression. She even says she went over to prove that the stereotype of black male savages in Haiti was wrong lmao.
Jattuph_Biscuitsshe/bitch
An educated, strictly organic, ortho molecular aware patriotic princess.
_riemann1413 25d ago#7912941
spent 0 currency on pings
She says, "they have every right to their anger...but their anger is misdirected."
I think she's too willing to excuse her male feminist, but I'm not in any position to tell someone else how to process her own trauma. Other than tone, there's nothing I specifically take issue with in her post. If you know anything about the history of Haiti that is one country that really did get fricked over in a major way by whiteoids, something that continues in the modern era. It doesn't excuse r*pe, but it's worth recognizing it is a deeply dysfunctional and broken society due in large part (not entirely) to the historical actions of european colonizers.
Haiti is a shithole because of the Fr*nch, but fundamentally the idea that she got r*ped on a rooftop in Haiti because her male feminist was angry due to colonialism is r-slurred and dangerous and fricks over the women she's trying to help. White patriarchy is not the reason for misogyny and r*pe in black or brown majority countries.
Note what she specifically says. The author says she went over there to write an article to deboonk the idea that Haitian men were savage male feminists who were abusing the women there, and when she got r*ped herself by a Haitian guy she doesn't change her mind but instead continues to blame "white patriarchy" for causing them to do this. Which is objectively untrue.
She's processing her trauma in this way specifically because she's a wingcucked leftoid who is willing to cling to her misguided beliefs even after they've been proved wrong.
Jattuph_Biscuitsshe/bitch
An educated, strictly organic, ortho molecular aware patriotic princess.
_riemann1413 25d ago#7913146
spent 0 currency on pings
>her male feminist was angry due to colonialism
I think you're injecting your own reading that isn't supported by the text: she doesn't say that her male feminist was angry because of colonialism. She says that Black men in general (in context, Haitian Black men) are justifiably angry and that women suffer at the hands of male anger and violence (in Haiti as everywhere).
It's honestly kind of impressive that she doesn't react to that horrific experience by abandoning her values to become racist and hateful. She would have more justification than most. She doesn't "cling to her misguided beliefs," the whole last paragraph is about her changing her mind.
>fricks over the women she's trying to help
How does echoing the call for more assistance for Haitian women "frick over" those women? What should she have said instead? "I was wrong, all Black men are savage male feminists," would that help women?
To my eyes, her statement is a bit mealy-mouthed and elides the moral agency of oppressed people in shitty situations -- being poor and angry is no excuse for committing r*pe -- but it's her experience, not mine. This story gets my back up every time it's posted because it's so slimy the way racists love to revel in this poor woman being r*ped.
she doesn't say that her male feminist was angry because of colonialism. She says that Black men in general (in context, Haitian Black men) are justifiably angry and that women suffer at the hands of male anger and violence (in Haiti as everywhere).
The problem with this reading (colonialism causes anger which causes r*pe) is that it absolves the male feminists of their responsibility is a stupid way. The male feminist is the only person at fault here, as there are plenty of Haitian men who live under the same effects of colonialism without having to r*pe. "Le justifiable anger over colonialism" has little to do with her or Haitian women being r*ped. Men don't r*pe because they're "angry", they r*pe because they're horny and lack empathy.
How does echoing the call for more assistance for Haitian women "frick over" those women?
Yeah because when she misidentifies the problem of Haitian males' sexual violence as due to "white patriarchy" she's helping Haitian women, right? Oh goody, she should go back over to Haiti and spend billions fighting "white patriarchy"! That'll surely help those poor Haitian women!
This story gets my back up every time it's posted because it's so slimy the way racists love to revel in this poor woman being r*ped.
They're not dunking on her for getting r*ped, but for insisting that it's "white patriarchy" which is responsible for Haitian men's sexual violence towards women. They're laughing at her because of her belief that Haitian men weren't actually savage male feminists was proved tragically wrong, yet her big takeaway is that it's whitey's fault for Haitian women being r*ped by Haitian men. She's about as morally courageous as a pro-life abortion protestor who gets an abortion herself but goes back to protesting the clinic because she's a wingcuck who recontextualizes her experience under her wingcuck politics. She makes excuses for Haitian men because doing otherwise would have caused her to be vilified and ostracized in her wingcuck circles. How can you not see this? Do you think she ever had the option of blaming Haitian men and staying with her social/academic circles? If she had shed be treated like Lara Logan, a weird right-wing loony who no one feels bad for.
Note how you brush off her insistence that her r*pe happened because of "white patriarchy" so easily. It's a completely idiotic concept that's fundamental to her message, yet you want to pretend it's not.
It's funny that she star eyed traveled to some r*pe capitol thinking the noble savages could never. Gets r*ped and goes on blame the white man for a black man raping her. Don't tell me that's not a little funny.
Snappybeep/boop
Join !friendsofsnappy 25d ago#7912289
spent 0 currency on pings
You know for as often as women talk about how we could crush their skulls with our bare hands, they sure seem to forget sometimes that we could crush their skulls with our bare hands.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
"Why would white men do this?"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
https://rdrama.net/h/chudrama/post/252537/-
I went to all the effort of
doxxing herusing publicly available information to determine the provenance of the story and never even got an effort post awardJump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i was hoping it was fake
!slots111
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is a classic post, it came out before everything was fake and straight
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Even your post is fake and straight considering thats how its always been
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
The fact that I believed it was fake ragebait says a lot about rightoids
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Insightful.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I thought it was fake, but appears to be real.
https://web.archive.org/web/20100428221031/https://race-talk.org/?p=4008
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
This seems reasonable to me? Are chuds just laughing at r*pe victims now?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
C'mon Jimie, don't act like you didn't read the part where she says black guys r*pe because of their anger towards whitoid oppression. She even says she went over to prove that the stereotype of black male savages in Haiti was wrong lmao.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
She says, "they have every right to their anger...but their anger is misdirected."
I think she's too willing to excuse her male feminist, but I'm not in any position to tell someone else how to process her own trauma. Other than tone, there's nothing I specifically take issue with in her post. If you know anything about the history of Haiti that is one country that really did get fricked over in a major way by whiteoids, something that continues in the modern era. It doesn't excuse r*pe, but it's worth recognizing it is a deeply dysfunctional and broken society due in large part (not entirely) to the historical actions of european colonizers.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Haiti is a shithole because of the Fr*nch, but fundamentally the idea that she got r*ped on a rooftop in Haiti because her male feminist was angry due to colonialism is r-slurred and dangerous and fricks over the women she's trying to help. White patriarchy is not the reason for misogyny and r*pe in black or brown majority countries.
Note what she specifically says. The author says she went over there to write an article to deboonk the idea that Haitian men were savage male feminists who were abusing the women there, and when she got r*ped herself by a Haitian guy she doesn't change her mind but instead continues to blame "white patriarchy" for causing them to do this. Which is objectively untrue.
She's processing her trauma in this way specifically because she's a wingcucked leftoid who is willing to cling to her misguided beliefs even after they've been proved wrong.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
people might take you more seriously if youd be less racist and capitalize the "b" in Black
!slots200
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I think you're injecting your own reading that isn't supported by the text: she doesn't say that her male feminist was angry because of colonialism. She says that Black men in general (in context, Haitian Black men) are justifiably angry and that women suffer at the hands of male anger and violence (in Haiti as everywhere).
It's honestly kind of impressive that she doesn't react to that horrific experience by abandoning her values to become racist and hateful. She would have more justification than most. She doesn't "cling to her misguided beliefs," the whole last paragraph is about her changing her mind.
How does echoing the call for more assistance for Haitian women "frick over" those women? What should she have said instead? "I was wrong, all Black men are savage male feminists," would that help women?
To my eyes, her statement is a bit mealy-mouthed and elides the moral agency of oppressed people in shitty situations -- being poor and angry is no excuse for committing r*pe -- but it's her experience, not mine. This story gets my back up every time it's posted because it's so slimy the way racists love to revel in this poor woman being r*ped.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The problem with this reading (colonialism causes anger which causes r*pe) is that it absolves the male feminists of their responsibility is a stupid way. The male feminist is the only person at fault here, as there are plenty of Haitian men who live under the same effects of colonialism without having to r*pe. "Le justifiable anger over colonialism" has little to do with her or Haitian women being r*ped. Men don't r*pe because they're "angry", they r*pe because they're horny and lack empathy.
Yeah because when she misidentifies the problem of Haitian males' sexual violence as due to "white patriarchy" she's helping Haitian women, right? Oh goody, she should go back over to Haiti and spend billions fighting "white patriarchy"! That'll surely help those poor Haitian women!
They're not dunking on her for getting r*ped, but for insisting that it's "white patriarchy" which is responsible for Haitian men's sexual violence towards women. They're laughing at her because of her belief that Haitian men weren't actually savage male feminists was proved tragically wrong, yet her big takeaway is that it's whitey's fault for Haitian women being r*ped by Haitian men. She's about as morally courageous as a pro-life abortion protestor who gets an abortion herself but goes back to protesting the clinic because she's a wingcuck who recontextualizes her experience under her wingcuck politics. She makes excuses for Haitian men because doing otherwise would have caused her to be vilified and ostracized in her wingcuck circles. How can you not see this? Do you think she ever had the option of blaming Haitian men and staying with her social/academic circles? If she had shed be treated like Lara Logan, a weird right-wing loony who no one feels bad for.
Note how you brush off her insistence that her r*pe happened because of "white patriarchy" so easily. It's a completely idiotic concept that's fundamental to her message, yet you want to pretend it's not.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
K
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
after what the Clinton fojndation did to Haiti i can see why theyd be big mad at white womcn
!slots222
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
zoz
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
zle
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!slots200
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
zozzle
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!slots300
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
!slots100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's funny that she star eyed traveled to some r*pe capitol thinking the noble savages could never. Gets r*ped and goes on blame the white man for a black man raping her. Don't tell me that's not a little funny.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I remember that story! She 100% enjoyed it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
But females keep screeching at me when I say that females are the enemy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
What a funny response to you being r*ped is to say your male feminist was doing it for deel reasons
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
You know for as often as women talk about how we could crush their skulls with our bare hands, they sure seem to forget sometimes that we could crush their skulls with our bare hands.
Snapshots:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Wait, this dumb twat thinks men are raping in response to some kind of oppression???
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Are they though?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context