Why accept this premise? How about no, there wasn't a lack of black people in LotR because it wasn't about black people. And there's no objective metric for how many sub-Saharans belong in some white guy's imaginary world based on English history.
Secondly, they don't believe in their own subjective standard anyways. They wouldn't say a fantasy world made by a black author and based on Zulu history lacked white people and required race swapping.
So what does that leave? Nothing. Their 'standard' is just a vacuous personal preference about someone else's creation and they don't even believe in it anyways.
There were plenty of sub-Saharan types in Tolkien's fantasy world, they were off on the bottom edge of the map. They were ruled by evil kings under Sauron and fought in his armies. There's a note about Aragorn bringing them freedom and peace. You could have a story that expands on them, but that wouldn't accomplish the mayocide of the existing story
You're completely right, but even accepting that "English history" matters is accepting that stories must reflect the racial background of the world as a precondition to being non-racist.
The story he wanted to tell involved the author's take on Englishmen, for whatever reason, or lack of reason, the author felt.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why accept this premise? How about no, there wasn't a lack of black people in LotR because it wasn't about black people. And there's no objective metric for how many sub-Saharans belong in some white guy's imaginary world based on English history.
Secondly, they don't believe in their own subjective standard anyways. They wouldn't say a fantasy world made by a black author and based on Zulu history lacked white people and required race swapping.
So what does that leave? Nothing. Their 'standard' is just a vacuous personal preference about someone else's creation and they don't even believe in it anyways.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There were plenty of sub-Saharan types in Tolkien's fantasy world, they were off on the bottom edge of the map. They were ruled by evil kings under Sauron and fought in his armies. There's a note about Aragorn bringing them freedom and peace. You could have a story that expands on them, but that wouldn't accomplish the mayocide of the existing story
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
You're completely right, but even accepting that "English history" matters is accepting that stories must reflect the racial background of the world as a precondition to being non-racist.
The story he wanted to tell involved the author's take on Englishmen, for whatever reason, or lack of reason, the author felt.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
We wuz numenoreans and sheet
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Aragorn being swapped to black isn't even the most egregious thing, they made fricking Galadriel black!!!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Finally, a depiction of Storm that I can identify with. Thank you WotC!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
For Aragorn.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Snapshots:
https://old.reddit.com/r/mpcproxies/comments/1g6t71d/storm_force_of_nature_sld/:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context