Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>costs nothing

That's assuming that relinquishing code or whatever that may be required to get the game to run on any server would cost the company $0.

Next gaymers would be demanding free customer support for life whenever their shitty server game craps out.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's assuming that relinquishing code or whatever that may be required to get the game to run on any server would cost the company $0.

that's what they got paid for. they didn't hand out the game for free.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wrong. Looks like you agree they should charge higher prices to compensate for future EU tardation.

:marseywholesome:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:
  • Ubie : Adding more bullshit.

they should charge higher prices to compensate for future EU tardation.

Keeping a server running costs less than $10k per year, which includes an hour per week for some employee to do minimal maintenance (periodically run a back up and restart, replace a broken hard drive etc).

If it cost $100M to develop the game, keeping it alive for an additional 10 years, increases that cost by 0.1%, they can recoup that by increasing the price from $59.99 to $60.05. And if it's still playable, people will keep buying it -- not many, not for a lot of money, but more than $10k per year.

_

The actual reason why game companies make their old games unplayable is to force gaymers to buy new games. That's the real cost of keeping the old game alive: losing 10% of the sales for Ubisoft's new racing game when it's exactly the same as the old one.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Only $0.05? Surely, the current players can scrounge up that amount. :marseywholesome:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If their intent was to shut it down, Ubisoft should have sold a subscription to the game instead of the game itself. I hope the EU punishes them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Looks like you agree they should charge higher prices to compensate for future EU tardation.

:marseywholesome:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

they should charge whatever price they think will maximize their revenue.

which is what they've already been doing since forever.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Well, sweaty, that's not true if later down the road they run into additional costs that are mandated by a regulatory agency.

:marseysmughips:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments
Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.