Ubiecute/twink It's okay, bb. It's only the internet.
11mo ago#6239653
spent 0 currency on pings
>racing game made in 2014
That'd be great for the EU. They should support every game they make or the company they acquired made indefinitely and charge Eurotards a higher regional price to compensate.
Ubiecute/twink It's okay, bb. It's only the internet.
IanMurdock 11mo ago#6241674
spent 0 currency on pings
They are being cheap (presumably, because the fix we imagine is so easy even though we don't know). Regardless, having regulatory agencies mandate vague support for 10+ years for every game or IP you acquire will drive prices upward. Hopefully that increase will focused on the r-slurs' region who can't understand long-term effects.
they should charge higher prices to compensate for future EU tardation.
Keeping a server running costs less than $10k per year, which includes an hour per week for some employee to do minimal maintenance (periodically run a back up and restart, replace a broken hard drive etc).
If it cost $100M to develop the game, keeping it alive for an additional 10 years, increases that cost by 0.1%, they can recoup that by increasing the price from $59.99 to $60.05. And if it's still playable, people will keep buying it -- not many, not for a lot of money, but more than $10k per year.
_
The actual reason why game companies make their old games unplayable is to force gaymers to buy new games. That's the real cost of keeping the old game alive: losing 10% of the sales for Ubisoft's new racing game when it's exactly the same as the old one.
conedno/no
if the bible has taught us nothing else, and it hasn't, its that girls should stick to girl sports.
DragOnMyBallZ 11mo ago#6239837
spent 0 currency on pings
I'm sorry guys, I feel like I am going fricking insane in this thread; none of you motherlovers understand the idea of legal precedent?
Even beyond legal precedent (which is explicitly why they are targeting The Crew, they see this as the easiest case to win and subsequently gain precedent for more important cases/games in the future), every single website you go on now asks you about cookies because the EU made a law on it. How is this so hard to understand? If they win this case, it could very well have a domino effect on the entire industry, regardless of whether the games are made in the EU or not, just like all the US sites that follow the EU laws on cookies.
Sometimes I can't tell if you guys are just confidently r-slurred/wrong, or if it's a bit. I think its just r-sluration in this case
I haven't been following this all that closely but I'm assuming they're going after this one because it was developed by French studios, and the French government has a history of being extremely neurodivergent about art preservation
IVIagicBaboonI/We
I’m 100% certain that at least half the mods do not have Faith or the Holy Spirit.
11mo ago#6241341Found 83 Coins!
spent 0 currency on pings
They should just release the source code so people can set up their own servers. Anyone who doesn't want to do that doesn't actually care about this decade-old game.
Ubiecute/twink It's okay, bb. It's only the internet.
IVIagicBaboon 11mo ago#6241528
spent 0 currency on pings
They don't want to relinquish nor jeapordize their intellectual property rights by publicizing it.
Ideally, they should cobble up a patch that let's people host their own games in exchange for however much that would cost ($500?). If the two dozen players of this game can't muster up the cash, then too bad.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Of course it would
be the crew players fricking
psycho
neighbors
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2568848953
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
That'd be great for the EU. They should support every game they make or the company they acquired made indefinitely and charge Eurotards a higher regional price to compensate.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Just let the community run their own servers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Hopefully that requires $0 spent by the company to get that done.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Darn. They warned me about crunchtime but not about this
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm the No. 1 Rayman fan
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Community servers were the norm for a long time when games were made on far lower budgets than modern AAA
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes, I know. I'm older than 20 years old, thank you very much.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm saying they're cheap you sperg
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They are being cheap (presumably, because the fix we imagine is so easy even though we don't know). Regardless, having regulatory agencies mandate vague support for 10+ years for every game or IP you acquire will drive prices upward. Hopefully that increase will focused on the r-slurs' region who can't understand long-term effects.
Y'all are dumb, sweaty. That's pretty much it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
running a server costs almost nothing, it's gonna be very few people playing.
alternatively they could make the software and instructions for running a private server available for download.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They don't pay anyone to keep track of it? No one manages that person? Wow, AI sure is great!
That'd be ideal. Hopefully the 12 remaining players have enough money to pool together for this.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
IT'S A PRODUCT PEOPLE BOUGHT SO I EXPECT IT TO WORK INDEFINITELY
THEY ADVERTISE IT AS "BUY THE GAME" INSTEAD OF "RENT THE SERVICE"
!nooticers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
EU bureaucrats have no life so they can spend literally all day filing "gib installer" notices to every game dev
!chuds
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Imagine "buying" Microsoft Office every year even though they don't update it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
DON"T YELL AT ME, MAYNIG.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
at most somebody has to turn it on and off again once every few weeks.
it costs literally nothing to host a server for 12 players. you can do it on an old laptop.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's assuming that relinquishing code or whatever that may be required to get the game to run on any server would cost the company $0.
Next gaymers would be demanding free customer support for life whenever their shitty server game craps out.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
that's what they got paid for. they didn't hand out the game for free.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wrong. Looks like you agree they should charge higher prices to compensate for future EU tardation.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Keeping a server running costs less than $10k per year, which includes an hour per week for some employee to do minimal maintenance (periodically run a back up and restart, replace a broken hard drive etc).
If it cost $100M to develop the game, keeping it alive for an additional 10 years, increases that cost by 0.1%, they can recoup that by increasing the price from $59.99 to $60.05. And if it's still playable, people will keep buying it -- not many, not for a lot of money, but more than $10k per year.
_
The actual reason why game companies make their old games unplayable is to force gaymers to buy new games. That's the real cost of keeping the old game alive: losing 10% of the sales for Ubisoft's new racing game when it's exactly the same as the old one.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Only $0.05? Surely, the current players can scrounge up that amount.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Nobody is asking for indefinite support, tard. Ubishart can release a patch that enables offline play and that's it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!chuds, only a libtard could ignore consequences this hard. Why are they soooo stupid?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Imagine caring about a 10 year old game
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
imagine imagining someone else imagine
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Imagine caring
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
About vidya
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Mold-Man bros, we're so back
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Snapshots:
https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/pirates-ask-eu-commission-to-look-into-killing-of-video-games/:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I get the reasoning as to why, but all over a decade-old mediocre racing game that nobody played? At least choose something good to start this over.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm sorry guys, I feel like I am going fricking insane in this thread; none of you motherlovers understand the idea of legal precedent?
Even beyond legal precedent (which is explicitly why they are targeting The Crew, they see this as the easiest case to win and subsequently gain precedent for more important cases/games in the future), every single website you go on now asks you about cookies because the EU made a law on it. How is this so hard to understand? If they win this case, it could very well have a domino effect on the entire industry, regardless of whether the games are made in the EU or not, just like all the US sites that follow the EU laws on cookies.
Sometimes I can't tell if you guys are just confidently r-slurred/wrong, or if it's a bit. I think its just r-sluration in this case
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssstop with the ssssssssssssssssssseriousposting
(but you're right I can't tell if people are just pretending to be r-slurred to rile me up)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I haven't been following this all that closely but I'm assuming they're going after this one because it was developed by French studios, and the French government has a history of being extremely neurodivergent about art preservation
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
They should just release the source code so people can set up their own servers. Anyone who doesn't want to do that doesn't actually care about this decade-old game.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh dear, another libtard.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If they're shutting down the servers anyway what's the problem?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They don't want to relinquish nor jeapordize their intellectual property rights by publicizing it.
Ideally, they should cobble up a patch that let's people host their own games in exchange for however much that would cost ($500?). If the two dozen players of this game can't muster up the cash, then too bad.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's funny to see corporations get buck broken by regulations though
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And it'll be fun watching prices rise for those countries!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
pretty wack that you can buy a console game and have it turned off
all of the nes and genesis games still work
vidya has gone backward
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Begå selvmord
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context