Activision takes down popular Call of Duty mod a day before it released :marseysaulgoodman: !G*mers are NOT HAPPY :marseyraging:

https://x.com/H2Multiplayer/status/1824167247436542167

The Trailer, posted earlier today.

Steam page is being flooded with negative reviews like Helldivers 2.

FaZe Clan (remember them?) begging Activision to reconsider.

A few especially evil points

  • They weren't profiting off of it and you need a legal copy to run the mod (although that's never stopped any lawyer :mariodance:)

  • Activision reportedly knew about the project for years

  • The series was on sale just a day prior to this

  • As with cease and desist orders, they can't distribute the mod in any legal way now

  • Obviously, this was done to deter players away from that old shit and back to black ops six


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17274905426203203.webp :#marseyloonalove::#marseyloonalove::#marseyloonalove:

69
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

As with cease and desist orders, they can't distribute the mod in any legal way now

cease and desist letters dont have any legal significance lol, theyre just that, letters

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Cease and desist this comment right now

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

they're still not releasing it (officially) if they don't want activision to r*pe their butt :marseyscared:


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17274905426203203.webp :#marseyloonalove::#marseyloonalove::#marseyloonalove:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

ye

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sure would be tragic if it were to leak and someone else release it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

haha... unless 😳

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I mean it serves to provide a notice date for any applicable damages calculation in some cases, but that's only if they actually sue after a C&D.


I would expect Activision to follow up with an actual suit given their track record.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I imagine getting significant costs is an uphill battle without sending one. Mind you, I've seen plenty of bad legal threats be used against the party that sent them for costs. Those vague bullshit letters that don't really say what you're doing wrong and how that hurts them and what law it breaks.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Depends a lot on the case type I find. My firm's largest patent award came from a situation where we just sued instead of sending a C&D since damages accrue by use and we didn't want a latches defense :marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah I don't actually do IP stuff. Most of my clients are disadvantaged so I get to play the little guy fighting the legal bullies card.

https://media.tenor.com/3t9I9rWHieUAAAAx/caveman-thats-the-way-i-think.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://media.tenor.com/8mddYUccA9cAAAAx/wrong-drumpf.webp

Cease and desist letters for copyright infringement can impact both liability and damages, and will impact costs awards (making the loser pay for some of your legal fees).

Some statutes require intentional infringement, or it can broaden damages. A proper letter is great evidence if they continue.

Many jurisdictions, including my own, drastically limit what your can get for costs if you don't take reasonable steps before suing.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

cease deez nuts neighbor

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.