https://www.ign.com/articles/civilization-7-review
"And, peculiarly, Civ 7 only really covers history up to about 1950. You get planes and tanks, but there are no home computers or helicopters in this tech tree at launch. The final science victory condition is launching the first manned spaceflight – quite a step back from setting up an exoplanet colony"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
My conclusion was that ubisoft didn't actually get worse necessarily but that other studios already surpassed them in doing what they are trying to do but better.
Assassin's creed Japan failed the moment they couldn't create gameplay and story better than Ghosts of Tsushima.
Watch dogs failed because Legion set in the UK sucked.
Far cry should still be fine in my opinion and a sequel in that category should be a success as they have no other competition in that type of game.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes I didnt bring up ghost of tsushima but it is another factor.
I think you are right in saying ubi didn't get worse; whenever I play their modern game they are fun but the same kind of fun I had with assassins creed 2... 15 years ago?
Now that's a memento mori, that almost half my life has occured concurrently to ubisoft releasing AC slop
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You think that's depressing. Every few months I get the realization that I have more happy memories with video games than I do with my own parents. Something about that just feels inhumane.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context