Strangest response to libertarianism accusations ever

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1738998693pvui0agZQ1S5wA.webp

65
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>make sequel woke

>immediately go full libertarian

What did he mean by this :marseythinkorino:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That he knows the difference between pixels on a screen and real children being molested.

Beyond that idk.

Quick question:

Is it more ethical to jerk off to drawings of children or real adult women who may or may not have been sexually trafficked?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You really about to start this shit? People have been permabanned for going down the exact route you're going; please, elaborate? :marseylaying:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

lol. and they are all r-slurred for it.

I shoot you is kill. I shoot next to your face is not kill no matter how much it makes you sneed about the idea that somebody could have died.

It is one of those situations where moral pearl clutching is getting in the way of real solutions. Such as when conservatives held the tradition of keeping the genders separate to stop pregnancies but in a world with far more porn and s*x and degeneracy the fertility rate has actually collapsed and people are having far less s*x than ever before.

You want to believe both that porn reduces r*pes but loli drawings increase libertarianism. That is an r-slured contradictory belief system at the heart of it.

You would rather watch real women get r*ped ( amateur porn doesn't guarantee consent ) than the potential of a libertarian being able to jerk off without raping kids. That's all I need to know about your morals and their worth.

Sorry if I came off as mean. I just know this is one of those things where reality and morality are in contradiction with one another which is why it pisses me off. The porn industry where exploited women actually do end up, having fewer restrictions than child porn drawings which again aren't actual real children is absurd at heart no matter what. That is not to say that I support making loli cartoons legal, but rather that I know those aren't real children so I do not give a shit about them and everyone who clutches their pearls at it looks insane and r-slurred to me.

Have a good day.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ok libertarian

!libertarianhunters

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyfuckyou:

NOoooooooo the drawing is getting r*ped nooooooooooooo jannies jannies do something he lusts after drawings noooooooooooo

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseypedosnipe:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseypearlclutch:

He is threatening my real life with that drawing of a sniper.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyxd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseybeheading:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You want to believe both that porn reduces r*pes but loli drawings increase libertarianism.

Both can be true. a libertarian gooning to the oldest anime character may be less likely to r*pe, but the existence of anime child gooning inherently results in more libertarians, which overall increases the net chance of a child to be r*ped, even if on an individual scale it's less :marseyoverallhapiness:

The biggest issue here is that libertarianphillia is inherently immoral and as such every libertarian should be shot regardless of if they're diddling kids :marseyagreefast: !chuds


dude bussy lmao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't care enough to work up a counter. I gave my bit about what annoys me.

Have a good day mate.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:soyc#ry: NOOOOO YOU NEED TO ARGUE WITH ME YOU NEED TO ARGUE SO I CAN CALL YOU A LIBERTARIAN DEFENDER WHY AREN'T YOU ARGUING NOOOO WHY WHY WHY WHAT THE FRICK COME ON YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO ARGUE WITH ME WHY AREN'T YOU ARGUING ARGUE WITH ME ARGUE WITH ME ARGUE WITH ME ARGUE WITH ME ARGUE WIME

:marseyraging#: I'LL REMBMER THIS YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO ARGUE IW AS SUPPOOSED TO GET YOU MAD YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO BE MAD WHY ARE YOU JUST WALKING AWAY WHY WHY WHY WHY

:soyjaktantrumfast#: FRICK YOU FRICK YOU FRICK YOU FRICK YOU FRICK YOU !CHUDS FRICK THIS PERSONF UCK THEM FAT CUN GFFUK I WAS SUPPOSED TO ARGUE WITH YOU WHYYY


dude bussy lmao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:pepeleave:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You would rather watch real women get r*ped

Yes. !male feminists

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's neurodivergent bait of the best kind :capypearlclutch:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyretardchad:

I always fall for it. I still don't know how to have the paying to watch a real person frick is ethically more questionable than watching a drawing or cartoon of a person fricking irrespective of age because one is a real human being and the other isn't in a way that doesn't get me banned.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseycheerupretard:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Phrasing it as may or may not have means obviously the women would be better lol. If you know they have been trafficed and forced and that is what turns you on then bust out ms paint instead please.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I disagree may or may not still carries a probability of supporting an industry that is recorded to support trafficking of women. I wouldn't mind both being banned.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jerk off to pictures of household appliances, if you know what I mean ;)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm like 20 hours in and it has the exact same tone as the first one. Have still yet to meet the one black guy in all of Bohemia but maybe when that happens it'll become WOKE

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Apparently the one straight romance you're allowed to pick will have the woman cheat on you with the black guy

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

darn they really went all out with the chud realism this time

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There are two female romances

You also can bang hoes and a widow

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

3 after I evict that ginger and plow pavlena

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not beating the nazi grifter allegations

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sir, that's based, not woke :marseyindignant:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How's the combat system?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>wake up to check out the news on /h/vidya

>KCD2 is now involved in libertarian drama by depicting the r*pe of a minor

>remind that I was working on a new post about AC: Shadows featuring a pooner samurai and a writer who wrote a thesis on "boy love" in feudal Japan between monks and little boys

>:#marseyclueless:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The first game had you fricking Theresa which would have realistically been like 12 if this was actually historical lol.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I heard that was a myth and most marriages happened at 16 - 20

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Right but Teresa and Henry isn't a marriage. It's 2 kids falling for each other and then moving on to other things. I mean even now in Europe losing your virginity at 14-15 is common. That was about when we started drinking and partying here in Sweden. The people that didn't are generally very weird.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

14 and 15 isn't 12 though

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No one in the game is portrayed as a kid anyways, there was a bit about her dad forcing her to marry some old rich fart while she's secretly pining for half-a-waterhead NEET Henry, a classic foid dilemma.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So they okay with straight kids banging but not two gay?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not really my point, more that there is no gay kid s*x in the sequel either lol. Hans Capon is a real guy, kinda and would have been 15 at the time. But he is played by a 31 year old and looks literally nothing like a child.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

that's just the inverse of the "this person who looks nine is actually a 9492 million year old dragon girl!!" libertarian gambit.


dude bussy lmao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah this is the dreaded adult fetishist's gambit I guess lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Adult fetishist libertarians need the rope just as much as normal libertarians :marseyagree: if they're getting aroused knowing someone is technically speaking underage that counts enough for me


dude bussy lmao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sounds r-slurred, you can put a disclaimer under a video of to 30y/os fricking saying "THESE ARE TODDLERS" that doesn't make it so.

Wtf is an adult fetishist libertarian lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

if the person is canonically under 18 that's libertarianphillia even if they look like a 40 year old


dude bussy lmao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyschizowall: :marseyschizotwitch:This means that Vavra is still secretly a right wing anti gay portraying gays as young boy chasers

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Now playing: Da Banana Bunch (DK64).mp3

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.