Reported by:
- Unbroken : We shouldn't have to tolerate this, carp
- NotLikeOtherFoids : gross
- Shreddedmanlet : Carp please have Yellow Fever award made.
- WulongLongdong : Posting jailbait to own the non-libertarians. Mop and rope jannies
- of_blood_and_salt : ^what he said
- A30B_BATTALION : keep yourself safe
- JannyStomper
This college girl pays you to teach her advanced econometrics and time series analysis What do you do?
- 83
- -23
Now playing: Cave Dweller Concert (DKC).mp3
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And also about socially successful political paradigms like the concept of informed consent which underlies many western laws. Anyway "evolutionarily successful paradigms" include genghis khan murdering half a continent so just because it worked once does not mean it should be encouraged.
Wrong, liberal democracy is the only truly successful period in human history and has recognized for over 100 years that allowing libertarians to frick 12 year olds leads to harm on the societal and individual levels. When underage marriage was common, divorce was not. If you want to frick a 12 year old you should be stuck with her until you die. Otherwise you just have a bunch of mentally damaged single mother foids running around ruining literally everything
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
errrr, no, society can and does pull off braindead paradigms that frick it over in the long run ... and do it lot quicker than evolution can pull off.
more cope cause that didn't last now did it? can you be less r-slurred please?
total cope, literally no one made this argument when actually making laws. the laws were made entirely baed on gut reactions to the concept without any unbiased consideration. doesn't explain the hysteria over males either.
and the political paradigm isn't based on "informed consent", any more than drug laws are based on "protecting people". both problems are heavily steeped in underlying social causes we aren't addressing ...
cause most people are barely thinking sheeple too subconscious to realize how violence hatred is literally always wrong, including you.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We are going in circles now but i genuinely cant parse this so im just going to ask what you mean:
Wut
Also muh sheeple is an argument most frequently utilized by 13 year olds. If youre 13 (including mentally, as is apparent) then I retract my accusation that you are a libertarian
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
cause ur opinion is informed by unrationalized gut reaction that has no bearing on why people started forcing the childhood virgin narrative down everyone's throats, in manner that is so religiously dogmatic they won't even allow alternative experiments to exist.
so? i find myself on a planet of people operating mostly on gut reaction without ever putting much unbiased thought into things. the amount of utter sin/insanity we are normalized to is both ungodly and unsustainable.
if you really gave a shit about solving single motherhood ... removing all exposure to sexuality as child probably isn't the right fricking way to do it. making people more ignorant of sexuality isn't going to then allow them to produce better decisions over it in the future ... i mean, literally no other form of knowledge is expected to work like this except carnal, apparently. like most of foid thought ... whatever r-slurred ad hoc rationalization pathetically attempting justify this emotion sourced hysteria, will form nothing more than a baseless house of cards.
ur too much a sheeple to even respond coherently, so just give up already.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If your complaint is "no fair stop being mean to the poor libertarians, use your words" then why are you calling me the foid? violence is a good thing and dissenters should be crushed. Thinking otherwise is feminine
Ah yes protecting children is a sin and raping 12 year olds is godly. Thanks Mr. Moore, I will keep that in mind
Gut reactions serve an evolutionary purpose too, you know
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
you mean actually justify ur violent tantrums?
tell me you're a noncognizant sheeple without saying it more directly, pulleeeez. those last attempts at appearing logical were beyond pathetic. you couldn't logic properly even if a dog shat bertrand russell directly into ur mouth. these conversations always go the way with people who never bothered to be anything more than highly controlled npcs
lol, typical foid "logic". keep hamster wheeling there, i'm sure you'll get no where in two weeks.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context