Former head of Twitter trust & safety, Yoel Roth, wrote 300 page dissertation about how kids should be allowed on Grindr

https://x.com/faayete/status/1594313751741845505

https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/60981d118b006454de9222b2/61d364a68536fc3f5cf77933_Roth-Dissertation.pdf

Yet, absent from these discussions is even a cursory recognition that the new medium of gay-targeted social networking may be a crucial social outlet for gay, bisexual, and questioning youth. While gay youth-oriented chat rooms and social networking services were available in the early 2000s, these services have largely fallen by the wayside, in favor of general-purpose platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Snapchat. Perhaps this is truly representative of an increasingly absent demand among young adults for networked spaces to engage with peers about their sexuality; but it’s worth considering how, if at all, the current generation of popular sites of gay networked sociability might fit into an overall queer social landscape that increasingly includes individuals under the age of 18. Even with the service’s extensive content management, Grindr may well be too lewd or too hook-up-oriented to be a safe and age-appropriate resource for teenagers; but the fact that people under 18 are on these services already indicates that we can’t readily dismiss these platforms out of hand as loci for queer youth culture. Rather than merely trying to absolve themselves of legal responsibility or, worse, trying to drive out teenagers entirely, service providers should instead focus on crafting safety strategies that can accommodate a wide variety of use cases for platforms like Grindr β€” including, possibly, their role in safely connecting queer young adults.

@Intervention

147
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I could easily see a case that went something like "kids are on these services anyways, better that you age verify them and only match them with similarly aged kids". That would be no worse than the status quo at least, and preferable even to a world where grindr didn't exist (as long as the age verification was at all reliable).

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If you're going to have an age verification system, why not just use it to keep the kids out so they won't "be on the service anyway"?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They'd probably go on reddit or groomercord or smth instead. Until we get proper age verification for the whole internet (inshallah) they'll find a way.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Didn't the bongs try this? With their porn needs age verification law? What happened to that?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.