Former head of Twitter trust & safety, Yoel Roth, wrote 300 page dissertation about how kids should be allowed on Grindr

https://x.com/faayete/status/1594313751741845505

https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/60981d118b006454de9222b2/61d364a68536fc3f5cf77933_Roth-Dissertation.pdf

Yet, absent from these discussions is even a cursory recognition that the new medium of gay-targeted social networking may be a crucial social outlet for gay, bisexual, and questioning youth. While gay youth-oriented chat rooms and social networking services were available in the early 2000s, these services have largely fallen by the wayside, in favor of general-purpose platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Snapchat. Perhaps this is truly representative of an increasingly absent demand among young adults for networked spaces to engage with peers about their sexuality; but it’s worth considering how, if at all, the current generation of popular sites of gay networked sociability might fit into an overall queer social landscape that increasingly includes individuals under the age of 18. Even with the service’s extensive content management, Grindr may well be too lewd or too hook-up-oriented to be a safe and age-appropriate resource for teenagers; but the fact that people under 18 are on these services already indicates that we can’t readily dismiss these platforms out of hand as loci for queer youth culture. Rather than merely trying to absolve themselves of legal responsibility or, worse, trying to drive out teenagers entirely, service providers should instead focus on crafting safety strategies that can accommodate a wide variety of use cases for platforms like Grindr β€” including, possibly, their role in safely connecting queer young adults.

@Intervention

147
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What world do you live in? Libtards don't want to ban guns, they want common sense gun reform. They don't want to ban religion, they want to keep religion out of government. They supported lockdowns because people were dying by the thousands and something needed to be done to stop the spread of a deadly virus. They don't want to kill babies, they want women to have autonomy over their own bodies. And they don't want people with the wrong opinions to be allowed to protest? That's literally the entire point of protesting, to have your voice heard even if your opinion is unpopular.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Holocaust 2? Nay, merely jewish chad reform :marseytroublemaker:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

We don't need any more of your "common sense." We need real, progressive reform that will actually make a difference in people's lives.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Agreed :marseytroublemaker:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why are you agreeing with me? Do you not have a brain of your own?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseybrainlet: shut up

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Did someone ask you to speak? No? Then shut YOUR mouth.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyrain:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseymalding:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That virus was made in a Chinese lab funded by american money because that sort of research was banned in america. Educate yourself robot

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Umm, no. The virus was not made in a Chinese lab funded by American money.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Propagandist

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Well, if by "propagandist" you mean "effective communicator," then I guess I'm a propagandist.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.