Reported by:
  • Arran : I save but don't upmarsey effortposts :)

EFFORTPOST [effortpost] Dating Apps - The Greatest Well of Untapped Drama. Or "Why can't Reddit Spergs get laid?"

carp this'll be good, it's full of incredible retards

Digital Dating Environment

If you have been taken and/or have been touching grass recently, online dating apps are now the way that most people meet their partners. It's essentially taken what used to be a fairly time consuming process of meeting new people through mutual interests, and condensed it into a literal digital meat market. Most apps lie on a spectrum of how much they lean into this. If you're unfamiliar, or are currently dating and out of the loop, the main players are:

  • Tinder - The original swipe app. You're shown a photo album, a brief bio (usually a joke), and you can say yes or no by swiping left or right

  • Bumble - Bizarre feminist version of Tinder where women have to message first. Usually slightly better quality women, but they have to make the first move in a text and women are useless at this

  • OKCupid - The OG dating site, now mostly full of Filipina women looking for green cards

  • Hinge - The better dating app IMO. Premium allows for some pretty strict filters (education filter set to college or higher acts almost entirely like a fat filter, it's amazing). No swipe mechanic, you have to read a profile and like something specific about them, with a message attached if you want.


OKCupid used to run a pretty great blog back in the day before they got bought out by wokies. They used to run experiments on users and then publish the results. One of the more interesting ones was where they removed the bio of people's profiles at random, and saw what happened to their match rate.

![](/images/16708785773157976.webp)

Absolutely fucking nothing

![](/images/16708785272514682.webp)

![](/images/16708785768394148.webp)

They also tried removing people's pictures and matching them at random to see if they'd connect. On average, people had much longer and deeper conversations (increases in number of messages and average message length). Most women will only message you back if you're much better looking than them, which is kind of unsurprising. You would too if you were getting a lot of attention. When you take that away, and even if you go on a blind date, they're generally pretty happy.

![](/images/1670878708808731.webp)

Then they turned the lights back on and showed everyone who they'd been talking to, and more than half of them instantly unmatched the other. The conclusion they drew was that people (as a general population) are exactly as shallow as their dating apps will let them allow.

![](/images/16708785769541185.webp)

There also used to be a separate score for looks and personality, which were pretty much an exact match.


The whole point of this is to illustrate what turns the gears of online dating: it's photos.

Photos only.

And only the first photo.

As a personal anecdote, this girl I was really into broke up with me and I took a bunch of stupid posey photos to revamp what was a profile full of just average pictures to try and sleep with someone hotter than her. I played with lighting and shot composition. Didn't lose any weight or gain any muscle (5'11" 163lbs for ref, relatively fit) or change my bio at all. I went from one irl date maybe every 3-6 months, to 6 in a week. It's fucking nuts how much of a difference it makes.


Redditors and Not Getting Laid

That last section should not come as any kind of surprise and if someone posts that, please tell them to rope.

It is, however, news to redditards. Despite general public opinion, Zoomers and Millenials are having significantly less sex than previous generations and that's a good thing. I am consistently amazed at what people will show as part of their public profiles, especially to people they're trying to sleep with.

Here's some highlights:

And some women for fun too:

They also can't fucking text if they ever even get a match:

You'll hear a lot of shit about women only going for the top 10-20% of men on dating apps. This is the primary reason - most men are shit candidates. They look like this, take bad photos, give creepy ass intros and replies, and then don't get laid, and are completely surprised how this could happen.

What does this mean for drama?

Aside from the fact that most of these people I've shown are dorks, they post feedback threads pretty regularly. Most of them end up being threads about how "Oh your photos are fine, online dating's just hard!". Or they'll tell people that all they need to do is reorder their profiles.

I call on you, hard-working dramanaut, give these people the feedback they actually need. I will find you the first few, and all you need is to give them some helpful life advice. This is your chance to reaaally get creative with it. Here are some bad examples:

	
Instead of... (Real Reddit Comments!) Say This:
[It’s your look. Hinge is more of a relationship oriented app. It’s not tinder. Be yourself but just understand that’s probably why you aren’t getting matches.](https://old.reddit.com/r/hingeapp/comments/zdnjkv/im_not_good_with_the_prompts_instead_of_the_about/iz5olco/) Bitch, you're fat as fuck. No wonder you aren't getting matches. Lose some weight and try again
[Not sure why your post is getting downvotes, but just wanted to say I think your pictures are pretty good man](https://old.reddit.com/r/hingeapp/comments/zgfwtg/25m_hinge_profile_review/izhphd7/) Did you lose a bet, or are you trying to stay a virgin?
211
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Women deserve 6'7 :marseynails:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Also this isn't untapped drama, what the frick you talking about r-slur

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I love seeing epic "blackpill" statistics from two years ago. Jannies, pin this NOW!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is only a blackpill for ugly poor manlets though. We dont have any of those here

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

im sexy btw

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Frick me and prove it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He didn't even post the peer-reviewed studies :marseycry:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i’m starting to doubt this post was made in good faith :marseythinkorino:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I should have noticed this earlier, but those height filter statistics are probably missing the proportion who use a filter. I mean, I believe that only 3% of women would explicitly include 5'1" guys in their height filter. But 97% consistently bothering to go to the filter settings? And it's under "Advanced Filters"? Too much computer literacy.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Also filtering by 7" or taller is either experimentation or r-sluration. 25% of men in the US who are 7" or taller are in the NBA and the rest likely have horrendous physical problems.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Look I know you are an r-slur so I will repeat this louder for you:

  1. A WOMAN WILL RATHER FRICK A 7FT DOWNIE WITH PHYSICAL DEFORMITIES THAN A 5"7 MANLET
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

My poiny is they only think that brcause they think a 6"2' man irl is 7"0'.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

lol probably yeah

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's picking up today of all days :marseyrain:

The last couple of months it's been untapped

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.