carp this'll be good, it's full of incredible retards
Digital Dating Environment
If you have been taken and/or have been touching grass recently, online dating apps are now the way that most people meet their partners. It's essentially taken what used to be a fairly time consuming process of meeting new people through mutual interests, and condensed it into a literal digital meat market. Most apps lie on a spectrum of how much they lean into this. If you're unfamiliar, or are currently dating and out of the loop, the main players are:
-
Tinder - The original swipe app. You're shown a photo album, a brief bio (usually a joke), and you can say yes or no by swiping left or right
-
Bumble - Bizarre feminist version of Tinder where women have to message first. Usually slightly better quality women, but they have to make the first move in a text and women are useless at this
-
OKCupid - The OG dating site, now mostly full of Filipina women looking for green cards
-
Hinge - The better dating app IMO. Premium allows for some pretty strict filters (education filter set to college or higher acts almost entirely like a fat filter, it's amazing). No swipe mechanic, you have to read a profile and like something specific about them, with a message attached if you want.
OKCupid used to run a pretty great blog back in the day before they got bought out by wokies. They used to run experiments on users and then publish the results. One of the more interesting ones was where they removed the bio of people's profiles at random, and saw what happened to their match rate.
Absolutely fucking nothing
They also tried removing people's pictures and matching them at random to see if they'd connect. On average, people had much longer and deeper conversations (increases in number of messages and average message length). Most women will only message you back if you're much better looking than them, which is kind of unsurprising. You would too if you were getting a lot of attention. When you take that away, and even if you go on a blind date, they're generally pretty happy.
Then they turned the lights back on and showed everyone who they'd been talking to, and more than half of them instantly unmatched the other. The conclusion they drew was that people (as a general population) are exactly as shallow as their dating apps will let them allow.
There also used to be a separate score for looks and personality, which were pretty much an exact match.
The whole point of this is to illustrate what turns the gears of online dating: it's photos.
Photos only.
And only the first photo.
As a personal anecdote, this girl I was really into broke up with me and I took a bunch of stupid posey photos to revamp what was a profile full of just average pictures to try and sleep with someone hotter than her. I played with lighting and shot composition. Didn't lose any weight or gain any muscle (5'11" 163lbs for ref, relatively fit) or change my bio at all. I went from one irl date maybe every 3-6 months, to 6 in a week. It's fucking nuts how much of a difference it makes.
Redditors and Not Getting Laid
That last section should not come as any kind of surprise and if someone posts that, please tell them to rope.
It is, however, news to redditards. Despite general public opinion, Zoomers and Millenials are having significantly less sex than previous generations and that's a good thing. I am consistently amazed at what people will show as part of their public profiles, especially to people they're trying to sleep with.
Here's some highlights:
And some women for fun too:
They also can't fucking text if they ever even get a match:
You'll hear a lot of shit about women only going for the top 10-20% of men on dating apps. This is the primary reason - most men are shit candidates. They look like this, take bad photos, give creepy ass intros and replies, and then don't get laid, and are completely surprised how this could happen.
What does this mean for drama?
Aside from the fact that most of these people I've shown are dorks, they post feedback threads pretty regularly. Most of them end up being threads about how "Oh your photos are fine, online dating's just hard!". Or they'll tell people that all they need to do is reorder their profiles.
I call on you, hard-working dramanaut, give these people the feedback they actually need. I will find you the first few, and all you need is to give them some helpful life advice. This is your chance to reaaally get creative with it. Here are some bad examples:
Instead of... (Real Reddit Comments!) | Say This: |
[Itβs your look. Hinge is more of a relationship oriented app. Itβs not tinder. Be yourself but just understand thatβs probably why you arenβt getting matches.](https://old.reddit.com/r/hingeapp/comments/zdnjkv/im_not_good_with_the_prompts_instead_of_the_about/iz5olco/) | Bitch, you're fat as fuck. No wonder you aren't getting matches. Lose some weight and try again |
[Not sure why your post is getting downvotes, but just wanted to say I think your pictures are pretty good man](https://old.reddit.com/r/hingeapp/comments/zgfwtg/25m_hinge_profile_review/izhphd7/) | Did you lose a bet, or are you trying to stay a virgin? |
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yea, strags are shallow (like gays), but stuck in a way more pretentious dance about it.
That 6'0'' -> 5'11'' is brutal followed by that 5'10''-> 5'9'' drop.
My heart goes out to you, short-king strags.
Luv me an effortpost, any effortpost. Good one bb
This, however, was a lie. Garden variety at best.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah honestly it's pretty brutal. No wonder everyone lies about their height. And thx bby
I thought I found >10 good tards for your viewing pleasure though, you can't tell me those pics aren't revolting
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm taller than 6'4", so I don't lie about my height.
I remember seeing a few profiles that said 'No guys over 6'4"' though, so I understand heightism
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
taller than 6'4 = genetic freak
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I read it as:
and was expecting it as such. Needed to add another sentence doubling-down to not look like a total
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Cucked by the filter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Suifuel, I'm 5'11'' but I'm going to start claiming I'm 6' I didn't know women considered me a manlet. I am six feet tall anyway with boots on
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If ur a few inches taller than the girl anyway, most are terrible at guesstimating how tall you actually are.
Am 6β2β but Iβve said 6β5β and some girls believe it. As long as you don't project a hopeless lack of confidence, I believe you can convince her that youβre 6β for long enough to get her to commit
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Or swallow
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
zoz
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
zle
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
zozzle
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
5'11'' in non-burger units is 180 cm (or 1.80 m), which is the tall cutoff basically everywhere where non-burger units are used, and 6 ft is 182 cm, therefore sweatym you're 2 centimeters shorter than I expected you would bem so you're a gigamanlet
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Thanks for the informative comment! I had no idea that my height would be such a disappointment to you. I'll try to make up for it by being an even bigger manlet in the future.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Eh, I'm and I did just fine by not being a redditor
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Are gays really that shallow? They some of the least picky people on earth.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Different flavor of shallow, the lack of pickiness is in itself shallow, but also gays can be some of the most brutal on aesthetics.
This is in contrast to all the feigning about a myriad of things mattering, but it coming down to looks and economic security.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
They are, but they also aren't.
Like they start out incredibly picky but the longer the night goes on the less they care.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
he just like me fr fr
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
ALLEZ LA REPUBLIQUE
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
The "shallow" stuff is for the club gays who are all repulsive catty twinks you wouldn't want to hang out with anyway, they're basically women
Normal bro gays will frick absolutely anything. You're a fat nerd with a neckbeard and a pokemon t-shirt? Nah, you're a bear cub, now bite the pillow for me and we'll snuggle after
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The 5'11" thing isn't even a height cutoff, it's an r-slur cutoff
If you're too stupid to lie about 1 or 2 inch height difference when women don't even have 3D spatial awareness and have 0 understanding of what heights and measurements are, you don't deserve to breed
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah height is the biggest scapegoat for getting no kitty. The lower limit for pulling average girls is probably 5β8. 6 foot+ really only matters when it comes to getting 9s or 10s. And even then, being rich arguably carries more weight
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context