makes a guide to turn their cheap sketches into finished works with AI
https://old.reddit.com/r/furry/comments/1062pdr/so_should_artists_charge_more_for_basic_line
this makes me not even want to offer sketches lol
Maybe AI can take that market too.
Wow... as someone who was hoping to one day be able to live off of my artwork this is absolutely just crushing me...
SOMEONE STOP THEM PLEASE!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Furries are the most r-slurred people in the universe lmao.
Edit:
This is amazingly crafted seethe material, imagine if someone told the big anti-AI artcels on twitter about it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lol this neighbor is gonna sue people for using the pictures they paid for in any way they want?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't think there's a lawyer willing to fail that many cases.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I would take all these cases pro bono just to make a judge look at furry porn
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
If youre wiing to go Infront a judge and say
I'm almost convinced it should be considered your IP
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Are his ToS even worth anything legally?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Iβm not too familiar with computer vision but how do you even prove your artwork was used to train an AI unless the engineers publish their dataset? I donβt think there is any way
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Disney's lawyers will find a way. I have to imagine their intellectual properties and their derivatives form a decent chunk of the training set, incedentally or not. I can see a hobbyist being able to defend, but not a site that charges membership fees to use the AI to make Scrooge McDuck porn based on screenshots from an episode of Ducktails that made it into the training set.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Using it to train the AI is almost impossible to prove and legally murky at best. On the other hand forbidding this kind of img2img application is easy enough, but unless the person buying the pic also publishes it somewhere the "artist" would never find out
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It sure is weird the the people that hate AI art the most seems to be the people that just draw shit other people made 20 years ago
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Someone should invite the guy who made it here. He'd fit right in I reckon
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
He already knows about us. Look at my other post lol.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Guys: /u/TrickyPride is allied with /r/LoveForAIArt, he's ALMOST one of us.
Should I invite him here?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Hello!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
HAHAHA WELCOME BROTHER, AWOOO πΊ
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Thanks for the guide!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Yea
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Done.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It'll get spam filtered and won't show if you include the full URL, just as a heads up (even in Reddit DMs)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I BELIEVE I circumvented that, will update.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context