Unable to load image

BBC retvrns to silent TV as all of their football presenters quit in solidarity after they suspended Gary Lineker for a Tweet :taylaugh:

Tweet that started it all

https://x.com/GaryLineker/status/1633111662352891908?cxt=HHwWiIC8kfCZ_aktAAAA

Officially, Linker "stepped down", but apparently he refused to apologize or take down the tweet after BBC asked him to so they suspended him.

This resulted in all of the co presenters and commentators to also "boycott"/quit for the time being

https://x.com/alanshearer/status/1634261207354843143

https://x.com/IanWright0/status/1634243318723821576

https://x.com/AlexScott/status/1634264832852500488

https://x.com/Wilsonfooty/status/1634333481302982656

For the sneed, just look at top of /r/soccer

BBC has fallen :chudsey:

BBC has been taken over by fascists

Redditors are protesting the best way they can - complaining to the manager and not paying their TV loicence

Luckily there's murdoch owned Sky to take down the Tories at BBC

All in all it was a massively r-slurred move by BBC as even Jeremy Clarkson, Piers Morgan and Gary Neville all support Lineker.

165
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Strange thing to be suspended for.

It's a moronic comment but it's not offensive. Maybe a Jewish executive didn’t like being compared to dinghy migrants.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I left it out of the post but it was allegedly because BBC requires impartiality from their presenters and comparing bong rightoids to nazis wasn't hecking okay.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Huh, that makes this way less insane. It's an r-slured tweet to suspend someone for but if there's an existing rule that presenters can't make political comments in public :marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They do not have a "no politics" rule, just vague rule about impartiality which isn't really enforced - this Tweet didn't result in any suspensions for example

![](https://i.rdrama.net/images/16785511691769865.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It makes me wonder whether they wanted liniker out in the first place, and are using this as an excuse.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

hmm okay back to it being insane then

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yeah the point is the bbc is paid for by taxes (loicense lol) so they have to remain "neutral" in all their content.

in practice everyone thinks its biased against them in particular.

in reality, like everything else in the west it has a left wing bias when it comes to r-slurred cultural shit like gay black vikings or electric cars or whatever, and then a """"liberal"""" (rightoid-hegemonic) worldview about economics and politics

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Impartiality fits the shoe:

an immeasurably cruel policy directed at the most vulnerable people in language that is not dissimilar to that used by Germany in the 30s

"You're not Nazis but your goals sure sound like them." Not exactly impartial... There might be a bit of a difference between not housing people in hotels (paid for) and literal extinction camps, but Lineker apparently sees things this way. Grenade of Drama in all directions! :marseypopcorn:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah but Lineker talks about sportsball not politics, and it's not like BBC has cared about impartiality till now

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

it's not like BBC has cared about impartiality

Agree #Corbyn

Lineker places current policy makers next to

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The BBC is currently trying to fix it's reputation for being full of leftoid zealots.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I’m sure

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Bingo

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But the BBC loves migrants and immigration and anything left wing, so wouldn't they support Lineker?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's like when Reddit banned chapo to save face about their real agenda

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Understandable for proper news but who cares about what the sports man believes?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.