Enlightened Centrist thinks we should like talk to each other man instead of burning schools down, paid shills (i.e. bottom-feeding cucks) get completely fricking histrionic about their right to exist

Proto-fascism is the earliest stage of fascism imo. Modi and Trump definitely fit into that. I just use the word as a short form of right wing authoritarianism.

That's great and all, but I asked for my burger without cheese.

I literally did. Fascism is primarily a set of emotional traits with a fluid doctrine, whatever needs to be true is true in pursuit of obtaining political power.

It's why fascism is so disparate in general outside of the national mood component.

Robert Paxton describes this:

To focus only on the educated carriers of intellect and culture in the search for fascist roots, furthermore, is to miss the most important register: subterranean passions and emotions. A nebula of attitudes was taking shape, and no one thinker ever put together a total philosophical system to support fascism. Even scholars who specialize in the quest for fascism’s intellectual and cultural origins, such as George Mosse, declare that the establishment of a “mood" is more important than “the search for some individual precursors."59 In that sense too, fascism is more plausibly linked to a set of “mobilizing passions" that shape fascist action than to a consistent and fully articulated philosophy. At bottom is a passionate nationalism. Allied to it is a conspiratorial and Manichean view of history as a battle between the good and evil camps, between the pure and the corrupt, in which one’s own community or nation has been the victim. In this Darwinian narrative, the chosen people have been weakened by political parties, social classes, unassimilable minorities, spoiled rentiers, and rationalist thinkers who lack the necessary sense of community. These “mobilizing passions," mostly taken for granted and not always overtly argued as intellectual propositions, form the emotional lava that set fascism’s foundations:

a sense of overwhelming crisis beyond the reach of any traditional solutions;

the primacy of the group, toward which one has duties superior to every right, whether individual or universal, and the subordination of the individual to it;

the belief that one’s group is a victim, a sentiment that justifies any action, without legal or moral limits, against its enemies, both internal and external;

dread of the group’s decline under the corrosive effects of individualistic liberalism, class conflict, and alien influences;

the need for closer integration of a purer community, by consent if possible, or by exclusionary violence if necessary;

the need for authority by natural leaders (always male), culminating in a national chief who alone is capable of incarnating the group’s destiny;

the superiority of the leader’s instincts over abstract and universal reason;

the beauty of violence and the efficacy of will, when they are devoted to the group’s success;

the right of the chosen people to dominate others without restraint from any kind of human or divine law, right being decided by the sole criterion of the group’s prowess within a Darwinian struggle.

You have no idea what you are talking about. You're confusing your own ignorance of the topic with me being hyperbolic.

Name a non-anecdotal case of this happening.

This is just a basic understanding of fascism, the fact you're unaware of this leads me to believe this is a topic you have no education on.