NULL'S TOTAL R-SLUR WAR: UPDATE

116
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Why you do think any company has to provide a platform for your speech

I see they are desperate to prove their warning against gutting Internet Neutrality right, by supporting the things they said rightoid Internet would have done to them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Big tech only supported net neutrality because it would guarantee they wouldn't be charged higher transit rates than smaller businesses. They tried to frame it as internet-freedom-bernie-sanders-municipal-internet-provider and succeeded.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They tried to frame it as internet-freedom

It's the same standard we use for phones and other utilities. They should feel lucky they don't get nationalized.


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17187151446911044.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17093267613293715.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17177781034384797.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think the Indian guy who repealed it basically saying that the entire infrastructure was created on the promise of very little regulation because the systems themselves were costly to build and turned a lot of it over to the free market to shoulder the costs (gov't loans and shit still existed, but private investment was heavily encouraged by that policy).

Obama basically broke taboo by touching on a subject that was intentionally neglected and the tech people realized they could have their cake and eat it too.

He wrote an article about it and called John Oliver or John Stewart a massive straggo.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!ranchers

KIWICHADS, ARE WE WINNING?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He's kicking the hive like crazy and refuses to let down, which is based, but it's going to be weird if we look back on kiwifarms as the deciding battle for a free internet

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The true ultimate battle for free speech on the internet (for real this time) is a gossip forum for the terminally online

:#marseygossip:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is why you gossip about powerless Texan Reddit jannies instead of the almighty thwomp :lizfongjones:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I so want Moon v. :marseytrain:ISP to be a Supreme Court case. :marseyadmire:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

null will never be safe on the clearnet again screenshot this.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm gonna fedpost irl

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A&H posters are half of the people rdrama dislikes on that site. The rest are the few alogs per thread who hate post 8 hours per day and cant laugh

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

TL;DR?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyblenderafter:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:drin#k:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Josh after, yes....

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I mean, isn't the whole argument here that WA itself has common carrier protections from network traffic or something? The 1A argument is irrelevant since this is about some other law, unless shitlibs want to argue that these laws are unconstitutional. Which would be beautifully ironic, if like actual Civil Rights laws and whatnot that protect chuds became disfavored.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't understand. What's going on?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.