Girlboss says babies should take their mothers surnames. Scrotes cope and seethe

https://twitter.com/DrProudman/status/1689326476502474776

Context

https://files.catbox.moe/z8y30y.jpg


Drama

OP continues dunking on the scrotes:

I'm a trend setter. And thanks to men's comments (showing they believe we are their property), women have been radicalised not to give their baby the father's surname. Thanks misogynists for helping me smash patriarchy! πŸ‘‹

Based

It's funny how mad men get when they start to be treated in the same way women have been for centuries.

:#marseyagree:

One day Proudman will put all the disgusting scrotes in concentration camps. Im counting down the days


The point is to make the father feel responsible for the child

That you think this is necessary says volumes about you and men in general.

Generally speaking, if a cultural practice has been around forever, it's best to exhibit some humility about it rather than assuming you know better than everyone who came before you.

The point is everyone knows the child is the mother's when she carried it in her body. That's why they take the father's surname. This whole "I carried the baby so it should have my name" is petty and childish


The obvious reason to give a baby the fathers surname is that everyone knows who the mother is. To give the baby the fathers name makes known for everyone who the father is.

Yes, and that appropriates ownership of reproduction and property to the man. You could have a system like Iceland where everyone is called β€œ<fathers name="">dottir/son” but substitute the mothers name instead. But that would define a matriarchal society which the men don't want.</fathers>

If you're a good Dad/parent your connection should be obvious enough without the need to have your kids named after you.


I gave my children my last name happily, its also my husbands last name which i took willingly when we married

Why would you take it willingly? It's an antiquated tradition

Because her husband is presumably worth his salt and wouldn't have married her if she's going to be petty enough to go against tradition. Marriage IS tradition, that's the whole point of it.

Not willingly madam, you were coerced into taking his name by the Patriarchy.

The Patriarchy is you telling this woman she doesn't know her own mind.

That's wrong. I am a feminist. As such, I'm telling this woman she doesn't know her own mind. What her mind should be telling her is that her husband oppressed her into taking his name. He must have done. Otherwise she wouldn't have taken it.

https://files.catbox.moe/jmincm.jpg


You can tell a male feminist by his hairline


They won't be happy till everybody hates everybody.

:#marseyhesright:


Did exactly this.

Your husband is a loser

103
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>mother's surname

you mean their grandfather's name

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No matter how far back they go, it's a father's name. Do foids even have a real surname? It's just whoever owns her and marriage the passing of ownership from one man to another.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

My favourite part is how African Americans choose wacky non-traditional first names, like Laquisha and Deshondre, but keep the traditional European surnames of the YTs who used to own their ancestors.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyschizotwitch: :marseybloodpuddle: omw to the courthouse to legally change my last name to Anridwo in honor of Andrea Rita Dworkin

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

extreme levels of nooticing

!nooticers

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There should be a badge for extremist noticing

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

just rock paper scissors that hoe everytime

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.