Excerpt with further redaction to profane words:
For the folks at home, the story I was working on was going to be published by the Daily Beast in Spring 2024. Everything was in place then we had to go to both Wikipedia and the National Archives for comment, as required by law. Archvies wouldn't speak to us and Wikipedia threatened to sue, I suspect because of what we had found out about their administrators. The piece had mainly been about administrator abuse, using cowtools on Wikipedia to trace ip addresses, dox people's identities then harass them in real life. The (Male Victim) clusterf*** was a big part of the story, but not the entire story. The real beef of the article was about female editors on their site being stalked and even assaulted after having their identities revealed online by administrators. I found several cases of that including a woman who was stabbed outside her home in Mexico City by a stalker who had researched who she was off of her Wikipeida profile.
Daily Beast backed out because of the lawsuit threat, but I still have the whole story and might one day sell the rights. For now, its back to Eastern Europe covering real news.
She also disclosed further details about these scandals.
I gave Daily Beast my story, I'm not sure if they will run it or not. You have to remember the (Male Victim) case is something of old news, as it happened five years ago in 2018. (Perp) and his internet activities were more recent, but he's been quiet now for about two years since I think he actually got a bit scared after his name started popping up on law enforcement radars. I've confirmed he was talked to at least once by law enforcement, mainly about his obsession with the U.S. government worker (Perp) who he had convinced himself was (Male Victim).
(Male Victim) probably did operate that account about fifteen years ago from what I can tell, but was one of several people who did. (Perp) and his buddies don't like it when their narrative gets spoiled, and refused to ever admit, even with the evidence staring them in the face, that the (Male Victim) account was clearly being operated by more than one person. It was actually (Witness) who confirmed that for me in one of our interviews and had himself spoken to two of the people who operated the account.
For those wondering, the end game of (Perp) appeared to be blackmail, or some kind of weird plan where he was going to fly to the United States and confront (Male Victim) in person literally at the front door of the National Archives and be some kind of Wikipedia hero - that's how crazy that guy is. He never went through with his plan since, like I said, law enforcement started taking an interest in him especially after it appeared he really did have a plot to travel internationally to a US federal building in Washington DC. What's really ironic is that when all the (redacted) was going down, (Male Victim) didn't even work at the National Archives anymore.
Also, gotta remember, (Male Victim) was only a small part of my story. In three years of research, I found over two dozen cases where Wikipedia administrators had misused their authority, traced ip addresses, and stalked people in real life. Two of the worst cases ever were (Female Victim A), who some on Wikipedia actually tried to bankrupt as well as a user named (Female Victim B) who apparently there was some type of plan to kidnap and r*pe. Not to mention (Female Victim C), who never told me her user name, but was attacked outside her apartment in Mexico City after a Wikipedia administrator traced her ip address and gave the information to her attacker.
It's actually a wonder no one has been killed yet by some of the people on that web site.
EDIT: Since this post is getting viral which I thank the rdrama community for, here are more breadcrumbs about the scandals.
The (Female Victim D) case was a major part of my recent article, and I spent about a year investigating what happened and interviewed her twice (virtually). What the Wikipedia case didn't report was that those two men did a "trial run" to her village a week or two beforehand and were seen on the street leading up to her home taking pictures and apparently watching her come and go, timing when she would be alone. They were seen by neighbors which is actually how she got tipped off about what was going on, but then the d**kheads started calling her house with both prank and hang up calls. When they came back for "the real thing" she was on her guard and saw them coming. That was also no innocent prank, and it certainly wasn't a misunderstanding where they "got lost on the train" and just happened to wind up on her remote street. I actually think they were trying to kidnap her.
After getting in touch a friend who in turn interacted with the reporter for more details, I learn that there are also a libertarian scandal within where one of the corrupt Wikipedia administrator tried to traffick a teenager from Thailand into his home.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Didn't read. Newsorting cute twink keep yourself safe
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Why do they have a set date for a story? Wouldn't they just release it as soon as it's done?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Prolly copyediting, proofreading, priorities in queue. But we still need a contingency plan to make these stories truly go viral worldwide and punish Wikipedia forever if Daily Beast chickened out from publishing them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
found the incel
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
π
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Is that really a requirement by law? I though it was just a thing most papers do so they can claim to be more balanced.
Also how come Daily Beast would back off so easily?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's quite a frequently asked question which she responded as follows:
Hopefully she is correct about the rewire. But we still need a contingency plan to make these stories truly go viral worldwide and punish Wikipedia forever if Daily Beast chickened out from publishing them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I am a little surprised the Daily Beast picked up interest in the story since Wikipedia is mostly politically aligned with them. Is the author freelance or part of the staff?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The author is freelance. She once written for a Jewish magazine and is now working as a foreign correspondent for a particularly reputable US newspaper.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Is that your website btw?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I have an account on that website but I don't own the latter.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
What case?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That case where Wikipedia out-scientologied the Scilons by harassing a government employee under the false belief that he is a vandal in Wikipedia.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why would they be upset over a simple vandalism? He probably just improved Wikipedia anyhow.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That made me laugh! However one man's vandal can be another man's productive editor and thus the term "vandalism" can carry a lot of subjectivity.
Wikipedia has a whole section of namespace to doxx and harass so-called vandals and last I heard, someone has snitched them to the data protection authorities in Germany for possible violation of GDPR.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Good
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
How to ensure Daily Beast or other outlets like NYT to publish the stories to bring upon the epic downfall, is a million dollar question.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
try contacting @TracingWoodgrains, maybe he can get it on Jesse Singal and Katie Herzog's Block and Reported podcast for a start
or tip off Bari Weiss' publication: https://www.thefp.com/about
or longpost about it on Hacker News
i somehow doubt that mainstream outlets would pick this up from the get go because i dont see them reporting on the wikimedia foundation's shady finances
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Thanks. Will leave a message on their wall.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
you can try his twitter since i'm not sure how often he comes here: https://x.com/tracewoodgrains
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Thanks. I don't have an account there but I'll ask a friend who does to ping them there.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
good luck! remember to update us!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Well, apologies for the late reply, and the friend did ping them on Twitter a few days ago. But so far he didn't respond. I think we should put this on more forum sites and imageboards as well but the thing about 4chan is that it blocks a lot of proxy ranges.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
he was just online yesterday, do you mind linking your friend's tweet? i'll ping @TracingWoodgrains
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
i want a (cute) woman to sexually harass me and make me feel uncomfortable and then make me her b-word and then her husband and make every waking minute completely miserable but i would still love and support her until i die before her
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Of course. Wikipedia editors are like reddit jannies on steroids. It follows that they are frequent sexual predators.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There indeed has a chomo among Wikipedia jannies. Post has been updated to reflect the fact.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Ladies, you don't have to put up with harassment, least of all from a wikilibertarian. Just edit the micropeepee article to include the peepee pics he sends you, and open a NPOV dispute if he tries to revert it.
Then delete your wiki account and go touch grass.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Women or "women?"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's wikipedia
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
This is Mavis
Snapshots:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
A user who claims to be a reporter had said that Daily Beast killed the story about Wikipedia's harassment scandals against women on a Wikipedia criticism forum:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
disclosed further details:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
@birdenthusiast you're not escaping this one
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why are we pinging @birdenthusiast ?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
@birdenthusiast is a user who loves Mavis
@RemindMeVaxxBot tags @birdenthusiast whenever Mavis is mentioned
@Snappy has very few Homoween quotes, one of which mentions Mavis, which, until recently, would cause @RemindMeVaxxBot to tag @birdenthusiast
@RemindMeVaxxBot has been stopped
We must replace him
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I do miss seeing the classic:
I bet @birdenthusiast liked it as well
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Why does @birdenthusiast love Mavis?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
@birdenthusiast loves Mavis because she's neurodivergent and loves Mavis' exaggerated, easy to read facial expressions and over the top personality
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
"She"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I guess that makes sense for @birdenthusiast to like Mavis for that then but Mavis appears in like four movies, why obsess over a character that is so limited?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I like Genndy so I support his characters
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
@birdenthusiast
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context