CONTEXT: A TILpost about the kraut manhood trials in upperclass and tertiary educated society called Mensur, being the cause of the modern Hollywoke Nazi badguy stereotype for having facial disfigurements and scars.
This is actually something I knew about. Many of you may be aware of the tired and trite cliche of hollywood badguys like Nazis being facially disfigured. Now the very earliest Hollywood films from 1950s to 1960s had actual basis on fact, that very large amounts of high officers in the Nazi High command actually were facially disfigured, as a sign of manhood and right of passage. The reason being mensur - a variant of dueling without clear winners, where the objective was not to display skill and defeat your opponent, but to demonstrate courage and fortitude, and to be capable of receiving voluntary disfiguring wounds, as well as to be able to receive it.
Oh by the way here is 1 minute video demonstrating the kraut young men in a mensur dual. No, this is not a satire, mensur duals which were taken with deadly seriousness in krautland and eastern europe genuinely did look this r-slurred.
But outside of the absurd comedic looking show of men standing like cowtools a few feet away, wacking each other with sharpened metal bars into each other's faces, this was deadly and serious at the time.
And could have severe consequences for any young men who did not have the guts to partake in this tradition, and would suffer severe social exclusion and dishonour.
Even another redditstrag actually explains it very well:
"That's because the Mensur (in spite of its origins in dueling) isn't supposed to be a physical contest between opponents but rather a test of character for the participants. There is no winner or loser, and the opponents are selected by a committee to be of roughly equal skill. But if a participant flinches or tries to evade cuts by stepping away from his position the Mensur is declared invalid and has to be repeated.
You can think of it as sort of an equivalent to the hazing rituals common in US student fraternities.
Edit: And as to why they fight with their padded sword arm high in the air is because in this starting position (with the arm up and the sword pointing downwards in front of the face) a participant is more or less completely protected against any rule-conforming cuts (ie. cuts to the head while only moving the sword hand and not the arm) if he simply does nothing (eg. if someone freezes during his first real Mensur - during training they use full face fencing masks). Cuts reaching the unprotected parts of the face are only possible while the participant is swinging his sword to make a cut of his own. And not allowing the participants to move their arms during an exchange considerably limits the amount of force that they can put into blows. That's also why they stand so close together, to limit the distance over which the sword can be accelerated before hitting."
Even other redditors actually displays knowledge as to the true objective of what mensur is supposed to be about:
"That's partly due to the fact, that the mensur is less about "Who is the best duelist?" and more about daring to risk pain and wounds.So it's basically about showing that you are a real man whom others can in principle trust should there ever be a real fight."
Finally someone linked a 4 minute documentary that explains why and how mensur came to be, and why it had influence upon the Hollywood Nazi steryotype, which is highly ironic as Hitler banned mensur fraternity duels in order to quell the nepotism of kraut aristocracy against the Nazi movement when he came into power, even though he had nothing against the act of mensur duals itself, but hated the high class which made up a large wing of german high command when the nazis came to power.
Even one Youtube comment sums it up:
Which brings us in todays soystraggotry:
"Men doing cringe shit to appear macho is as old as time itself. Embarrassing." - reddit turbo Betamale
Now I'm not gonna tell you dramatards that men ripping each other's faces with sharpened rods to pieces was very smart and clever and totally the height of chadliness or some such nonsense, and how we should respect the bullshit traditions of boomertards
But often I see this this insufferable Presentism applied to complex societal forces and events in the past, without even an attempt to understand why they came to be, and merely applying the arrogance of believing only the now and present is right and smart, and to so judge events of the past.
Even other redditors explain the historic and cultural reasons behind why mensur developed as ritual, but this doesnt impress the Beta cucks.
"One can indeed argue that it is embarassing when looked at through the pink glasses of modernity where the (industrial) world is incredibly peaceful. But historically it was incredibly important that men could trust other men with their backs, no matter the situation. And someone who risks injuries in the name of honor in itself will probably also risk injury in the name of the honor of fighting together against the enemy."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
redditors in general are r-slurred but redditors talking about anything that happened at any time in the past? holy shit. just absolute fricking peak r-slur. everything must be judged on current modern morals/sensibilities/etc.
god i hate redditors
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The irony is these are the people preaching about empathy and understanding yet they can't even for a moment consider what sort of worldview a kraut born in 1890 would likely develope. They really are the same as rightoids, just expressed differently.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The comment linked by OP is unironically right. Men doing cringe shit to appear macho is as old as time itself. There isn't any difference between getting a face scar and getting your fraternity tattoo'd on your butt cheek. It's simply an artistic expression championed by male peers. AKA doing cringe shit to appear macho.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
there definitely is a difference
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
or
call it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Imagine jumping on a grenade to save a brother in arms from your platoon, and as you lay there, your blood pooling and your guts spilling out, your vision fading to black, he says โYikes. Why the embarrassingly toxic masculinity?โ
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Scarring each others faces to pretend to be manly and indoctrinated into only considering each other human is the same as jumping on a grenade to save your brothers life.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I suggest a competition of standing two redditors across from one another, and having each call out the various things he does to show his superiority to displays of performative machismo. "I'm comfortable with expressing my emotions", "I'm not afraid to paint my nails", "I take the lion's share of the housework in a relationship", "I would be overjoyed dating a woman with an onlyfans" etc. If either flinches, it shall be understood that he is a chud and cannot be relied upon.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
This is entirely correct though? Men doing dumb shit to prove their masculinity is almost a universal across human cultures. It's not presentism to point out such an obvious fact.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
WRONG
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Haha! Good one, my BIPOC!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oof that's really problematic. Try "my dude" next time. Thanks for coming to my TED Talk.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Dramatards aren't demoralized enough to accept criticism of male behaviour, but also not socialized enough to embrace the fact that men do dumb shit sometimes which is totally okay and part of the human experience.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If you're going to make fun of foids then it's only fair to take criticism of male behavior in stride
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Dumb, maybe, cringe, hardly. Literal armed combat is not embarrassing, even if it's not smart.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This type of thinking is why Russians still consider human wave tactics the peak of warfare.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
krauts, for once
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Cmon y'all, that did look really little silly.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Very silly
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's probably about making sure young men stop feeling invincible faster
<- me when my 17 year old cousin has started sauntering around while bragging about being employed and hasn't hit his beloved new (used) car against anything yet and he's started drinking energy drinks and speeding
<- me a year later when he finally hits someone (another arrogant young man lmaooo) and no one dies
the scar on his car changed him, he looks like a tired adult now
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Oh cool, another aspect of subhuman kraut culture I didn't know about. Watching them makes me feel like Jane Goodall.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Wife is J-pilled, parents are open and never opposing to my distain for jews and my love of history and the NatSoc movement. Sister in law is bleeding heart liberal, but not extreme leftist still shuts down and won't talk when cornered in an argument against her beliefs.
Anyways, today somehow jews came up and WWII which got the comment โHitler was the most evil manโ my wife overhears, rolls her eyes, gets ready for the speech. I casually explain to my sister in law what the jews did to German people before WWII and why Hitler gained power, what he did for Germany, and how the Holocaust doesn't make sense and numbers don't add up.
I talked for an hour straight as she butted in with questions but sat quietly listening as you could see her face deeply question everything she's been told. After an hour she didn't freak out or shut down, just politely said โthat's all I can handle on Christmasโ and when we hugged goodbye she whispered โnaziโ as I whispered โsieg heilโ at the same time to each other and everyone burst out laughing.
That would have NEVER happened before. The fact it did means she is becoming much more comfortable with my views which I consider huge win.
Merry Christmas!
Snapshots:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
https://old.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/18iw7t5/til_nazi_villains_in_movies_often_having_dramatic:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
https://old.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/18iw7t5/til_nazi_villains_in_movies_often_having_dramatic/kdhq3zw?context=8:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
https://old.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/18iw7t5/til_nazi_villains_in_movies_often_having_dramatic/kdgbi8i?context=8:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
These are the people that will ask you to do a group haka.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It is a stupid tradition
This is why military dictatorships fail.
The people in them have more loyalty to each other and irrational displays of bravado than they do to the nation state.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context