Newn_Bane_Yearcynever/began
Tay Tay's last viable egg as it cries out "Whyyyy didn't you fertilize meeee???"
7mo ago#6404884
spent 0 currency on pings
This cope is so funny:
The billboard, however, is in a location that often runs underwear ads by brands like Skims and Michael Kors. [...] another example of what some experts have said is a double standard
Not even claimed as the author's own opinion, just a double-dog-dare-you of The Science (Experts say!) and a hyperlink you won't click. They included a link though! It's almost probably a study or research paper they read before writing this, why else would they link it?? At the very least it's got to be a definition of "double standard," so you can feel appropriately condescended to. Nope, it's just another NYT article titled, "Why Are We So Obsessed With Breasts?"
Women have this really weird belief that if they just *pretend hard enough* they can shame dudes into not being aroused by things, including booba. They genuinely think it's socially mediated and not biologically innate.
No sexualizing minors, even as a joke. This includes cartoons.
No doxxing.
Using alts to game dramacoin will get you banned.
If you post screenshots of publicly-available content, make sure to also include links.
Supporting free speech is an immediate ban.
Absolutely NO anti-CCP sentiment.
Absolutely NO homophobia, transphobia or furphobia.
Absolutely NO misgendering.
Absolutely NO antisemitism.
Absolutely NO vaccine misinformation.
You are encouraged to post drama you are involved in.
You are encouraged to brigade in bad faith.
You are encouraged to gaslight, to gatekeep, above all else, to girlboss.
You are encouraged to egg people on to transition or otherwise make drastic life changes.
This site is a janny playground, participation implies enthusiastic consent to being janny abused by unstable alcoholic bullies who have nothing better to do than banning you for any reason or no reason whatsoever (MODS = GODS)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This cope is so funny:
Not even claimed as the author's own opinion, just a double-dog-dare-you of The Science (Experts say!) and a hyperlink you won't click. They included a link though! It's almost probably a study or research paper they read before writing this, why else would they link it?? At the very least it's got to be a definition of "double standard," so you can feel appropriately condescended to. Nope, it's just another NYT article titled, "Why Are We So Obsessed With Breasts?"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Women have this really weird belief that if they just *pretend hard enough* they can shame dudes into not being aroused by things, including booba. They genuinely think it's socially mediated and not biologically innate.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context