They get paid to stir up world-wide drama. And get insane perks and other special privileges. The central (secret probably) leader team is probably 95% greedy narcissistic control freaks and 5% dramatards executing absolutely bullshit over-complicated plans for kicks.
Color revolutions, "extraordinary rendition", domestic wiretaps, downloading everything ever said with a cell phone to that giant data site in Utah, starting the Iraq War, etc. They're pretty active.
You can probably add "helping Occupy to kill itself" to the list and probably "continuing to interfere in Ciba and Venzuela et al" as well
Leftoid cope. Their ideology was designed to turn on their own because they have no idea how to attain their goals, which also are vague and contradictory.
I'm glad I'm not the only one to recognize that narrative as cope. OWS was a fricking mess and the only people who think it was the cusp of some kind of financial revolution are zoomers and morons.
It's >99% cope and <1% glowie-paid guys joining a majority that is already praising their leaders for being so r-slurred.
let themselves fall for the whole wave of "wokeness" that we have now.
They didn't "fall" for it. They've always held those principles of egalitarianism and oppression olympics, so this "race to the bottom" will always get the best of them. Their ideology has no brakes because that would exclude others, silence is violence, and so on.
Imo it was actually the FBI but according to paranoid leftoids they were both responsible for NYPD allegedly moving tonnes of homeless to the protest area to frick it up (that's a classic COINTELPRO-style move but on the other hand they could have just gone there on their own) and for promoting the "progressive stack" which meant that only the most intersectional morons could talk and nothing could get done (that is actually textbook COINTELPRO, see e.g. what the CIA did with the American Indian Movement, but leftoids are r-slurred so I think they did that to themselves too).
COINTELPRO was always an FBI thing but the CIA doesn't give a frick about any restrictions on operating domestically and has stuff like Operation CHAOS which was just COINTELPRO: The Sequel.
I remember some of the dumbest feminist stories were coming out of the Guardian in 2015, stuff indistinguishable from parody. Right after they got "in trouble" for Snowden. They went from publishing Glenn Greenwald and Charlie Brooker (two of the smartest, sharpest guys in the world) straight into this dumbest girl in your class style 'feminism.' Felt like the biggest shift in mainstream press in my lifetime, I kept saying "some editor at the Guardian knows this is a joke, right? They're pranking us?" And then I think the story's would do numbers, viral like "can't believe how stupid this is." That was when journos acquired subhuman rep, they were just a little boring, in 2012.
Urborospsy/op SCROTIE.BIZ Author of the Real Puking Novel from "South Park" UpvoteIfYouCope 3yr ago#838097
spent 0 currency on pings
Yeah, and 2014 is when everyone in publishing got incredibly stupid, they were just boring, prior to that. College kids have been writing that woke hack drivel for 30 years, the Guardian would throw it in the garbage. It was an indicator you had no writing chops and were a hack.
on the other hand they could have just gone there on their own
They did. Protestors were offering food and places to sit.
The Deep State didn't have to do frickall to OWS because the movement was a complete mess. Only zoomers think it was something more because they weren't old enough at the time.
promoting the "progressive stack" which meant that only the most intersectional morons could talk and nothing could get done (that is actually textbook COINTELPRO, see e.g. what the CIA did with the American Indian Movement, but leftoids are r-slurred so I think they did that to themselves too).
I don't see the difference between the two options. If leftoids are ideologically r-slurred enough to enthusiastically accept this bullshit, who cares who particular came up with it, someone would've invented something like that anyway.
I do not really disagree but usually the way COINTELPRO works is that the agency has its shills work their way into positions of power and then ban anyone who disagrees with whatever dumb shit they're proposing. There are usually also wreckers whose sole purpose is to cause infighting by taking dumb as frick positions on everything. So unless your organization is both disciplined and ideologically uniform you are generally fricked once youve been targeted.
I'm sure they also sent all the homeless people to steal CHAZ's food too. Leftoids are always at the cusp of greatness before the deep state smacks them down.
It has been remarked on a million times, but I canβt get over the complete flip-flop on the three letter agencies between rightoids and leftoids. In the bush years, they had a long and well documented history of being evil screw-ups to leftoids but were righteous treasures to rightoids. Now it is the complete opposite.
I would say the same about big business, but rightoids are so r-slurred that many still love them even though the megacorps hate their guts and continue to grind them into dust.
Helgerson's book was published by the CIA for US officials. The CIA says in the book that its contents are the author's, and do not reflect the position of the CIA or any other US government agency.
PlatyfiendPikle/Rick
BLMβπΏπACABβπΏπBLMβπΏπACABβπΏπBLMβπΏπACABβπΏπBLMβπΏπACABβπΏπBLMβπΏπACABβπΏπBLMβπΏπACAB
3yr ago#839288
spent 0 currency on pings
Wasn't there also a story about his staff needing to give him doctored newspaper articles praising him, so he'd be in a good mood? I recall hearing something to that effect, but am not American, so don't know if it was just satire.
They'll write this shit and not even for a second think if giving president literal fake news is going too far.
Snappybeep/boop
Join !friendsofsnappy 3yr ago#836378
spent 0 currency on pings
With a wit like that, me responding to you would be the internet equivalent of beating up a small child. So instead I will refrain, enjoy a snickers, and hope to god you kids are not serious about this person. Here's your upmarsey, you little creep.
No sexualizing minors, even as a joke. This includes cartoons.
No doxxing.
Using alts to game dramacoin will get you banned.
If you post screenshots of publicly-available content, make sure to also include links.
Supporting free speech is an immediate ban.
Absolutely NO anti-CCP sentiment.
Absolutely NO homophobia, transphobia or furphobia.
Absolutely NO misgendering.
Absolutely NO antisemitism.
Absolutely NO vaccine misinformation.
You are encouraged to post drama you are involved in.
You are encouraged to brigade in bad faith.
You are encouraged to gaslight, to gatekeep, above all else, to girlboss.
You are encouraged to egg people on to transition or otherwise make drastic life changes.
This site is a janny playground, participation implies enthusiastic consent to being janny abused by unstable alcoholic bullies who have nothing better to do than banning you for any reason or no reason whatsoever (MODS = GODS)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
One of the few things dramatards and r/politics have in common.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Dramatards seem to love them unconditionally, r/politics love depends on the article headline.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I love Operation Phoenix!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
They get paid to stir up world-wide drama. And get insane perks and other special privileges. The central (secret probably) leader team is probably 95% greedy narcissistic control freaks and 5% dramatards executing absolutely bullshit over-complicated plans for kicks.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Yeah but this time the glowies are the good guys
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The glowies are always the good guys.
Have you seen Sicario? Glowies are so cool
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Anyone that enables
@2:00 is alright in my book
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You are wrong.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Ngl Rotten wall people and killing children in front of their parents makes an amazing movie . Taylor Sheridan is one of my favorite filmmakers.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Happens about once every other decade. Last time was when the CIA got prevented from saying that Iraq didn't have nukes by Dubya and Bolton and Condi.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
if the CIA was really the good guys, they would have killed bill belichick years ago.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Glowies confirmed Patriots fans, the worst type of βhuman beingβ
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
BB just gave away one of his Super Bowl rings to Putin. He is an unamerican traitor.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Has the CIA accomplished anything post cold war?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Color revolutions, "extraordinary rendition", domestic wiretaps, downloading everything ever said with a cell phone to that giant data site in Utah, starting the Iraq War, etc. They're pretty active.
You can probably add "helping Occupy to kill itself" to the list and probably "continuing to interfere in Ciba and Venzuela et al" as well
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What did the CIA have to do with Occupy?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notice that all that class anger is now race anger.
Can't go fricking with the elites money
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The "Everyone talk about
s, for some reason" psyop too strong.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Thatβs just the chemicals that turn the frogs gay finally hitting critical mass in our population.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Probably mike Obamaβs idea tbh
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Leftoid cope. Their ideology was designed to turn on their own because they have no idea how to attain their goals, which also are vague and contradictory.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm glad I'm not the only one to recognize that narrative as cope. OWS was a fricking mess and the only people who think it was the cusp of some kind of financial revolution are zoomers and morons.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's >99% cope and <1% glowie-paid guys joining a majority that is already praising their leaders for being so r-slurred.
They didn't "fall" for it. They've always held those principles of egalitarianism and oppression olympics, so this "race to the bottom" will always get the best of them. Their ideology has no brakes because that would exclude others, silence is violence, and so on.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Imo it was actually the FBI but according to paranoid leftoids they were both responsible for NYPD allegedly moving tonnes of homeless to the protest area to frick it up (that's a classic COINTELPRO-style move but on the other hand they could have just gone there on their own) and for promoting the "progressive stack" which meant that only the most intersectional morons could talk and nothing could get done (that is actually textbook COINTELPRO, see e.g. what the CIA did with the American Indian Movement, but leftoids are r-slurred so I think they did that to themselves too).
COINTELPRO was always an FBI thing but the CIA doesn't give a frick about any restrictions on operating domestically and has stuff like Operation CHAOS which was just COINTELPRO: The Sequel.
It's all pretty speculative. We know that the FBI did this: https://theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/dec/29/fbi-coordinated-crackdown-occupy
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I remember some of the dumbest feminist stories were coming out of the Guardian in 2015, stuff indistinguishable from parody. Right after they got "in trouble" for Snowden. They went from publishing Glenn Greenwald and Charlie Brooker (two of the smartest, sharpest guys in the world) straight into this dumbest girl in your class style 'feminism.' Felt like the biggest shift in mainstream press in my lifetime, I kept saying "some editor at the Guardian knows this is a joke, right? They're pranking us?" And then I think the story's would do numbers, viral like "can't believe how stupid this is." That was when journos acquired subhuman rep, they were just a little boring, in 2012.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They probably got a knock on the door from glowies lol. That's what happened to WaPo but I can't find a good link after a full 30 seconds of googling
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Snowden was in 2013.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, and 2014 is when everyone in publishing got incredibly stupid, they were just boring, prior to that. College kids have been writing that woke hack drivel for 30 years, the Guardian would throw it in the garbage. It was an indicator you had no writing chops and were a hack.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is a straight up zoomer fantasy on your part. Everyone knew about the surveillance and still does.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
They did. Protestors were offering food and places to sit.
The Deep State didn't have to do frickall to OWS because the movement was a complete mess. Only zoomers think it was something more because they weren't old enough at the time.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I don't see the difference between the two options. If leftoids are ideologically r-slurred enough to enthusiastically accept this bullshit, who cares who particular came up with it, someone would've invented something like that anyway.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I do not really disagree but usually the way COINTELPRO works is that the agency has its shills work their way into positions of power and then ban anyone who disagrees with whatever dumb shit they're proposing. There are usually also wreckers whose sole purpose is to cause infighting by taking dumb as frick positions on everything. So unless your organization is both disciplined and ideologically uniform you are generally fricked once youve been targeted.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
There was no organization to infiltrate.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Never attribute to happenstance that which could involve glowies.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Everything could involve glowies. Idiots are far more common than glowies, though.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I'm sure they also sent all the homeless people to steal CHAZ's food too. Leftoids are always at the cusp of greatness before the deep state smacks them down.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
The domestic spying was the NSA lol, do you even read your Snowden?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They're all 3 letters and full of glowies, pretty easy to confuse.
But also no, not just the NSA: https://aclu.org/blog/national-security/privacy-and-surveillance/new-docs-raise-questions-about-cia-spying-here-home
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
>ACLU
>unbiased
James Bamford has some great books about the NSA.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The ACLU is shit now but I'm not here to research for you sweaty, educate yourself
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
"The CIA are earnest civil servants with no agenda" is one of reddits spicier takes in a while
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Probably that same redditor in the past/future
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It has been remarked on a million times, but I canβt get over the complete flip-flop on the three letter agencies between rightoids and leftoids. In the bush years, they had a long and well documented history of being evil screw-ups to leftoids but were righteous treasures to rightoids. Now it is the complete opposite.
I would say the same about big business, but rightoids are so r-slurred that many still love them even though the megacorps hate their guts and continue to grind them into dust.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
So some guy that used to work at the CIA is cashing in on the drumpf hate years late (also with some Nixon bashing as well)
Shocking that r/politics didn't actually read the like 1 minute article
what a cute twink glowie
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Party In The CIA by Weird Al
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Glennpai was right yet again
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
They'll write this shit and not even for a second think if giving president literal fake news is going too far.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
With a wit like that, me responding to you would be the internet equivalent of beating up a small child. So instead I will refrain, enjoy a snickers, and hope to god you kids are not serious about this person. Here's your upmarsey, you little creep.
Snapshots:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context