Being the supreme leader in a vegetative state for 4 years is nothing compared to thousands of years for the God Emperor in Warhammer 40k, so what are we even talking about? The point is that the Democrats behind him can make the correct choices to prevent the chaos chuds from ruining everthing, and destroying the world, and that's what really matters.
Reported by:
-
FreedomforIsrael
:
- ObamaBinLaden : I would vote for whichever candidate promises to repeal voting rights for women
- RdramasChiefHomophobe : Vote blue no matter who!
- MoidAppreciator : Anti-trump bigotry
- Bartendercel : Dramamisia
- FamilyGuyShill : noone cares neighbor
I would vote for Biden even if he was in a vegetative state to prevent the Republicans from gaining power
- 412
- 175
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I would vote Biden cuz i hate Vatziggers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
this is exactly my thinking too, if i was an american citizen i would vote for him just for this one thing
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What's astonishing for me personally, is that my politics, morals align with trump on 80% of shit, and despite his crassness and vulgarity, the actual IRL policies and legislation he pushed in his term was things I would support.
I literally would have voted for Trump in the 2016 election, and literally would have voted for him in the 2020 election.
But in this r-slurred specific scenario, in this moment in time in 2024, with this obscene magatard yank wingcuckery where fricking conservacucks are pro-russia, I would be pushed on this one issue for Biden in this specific election.
Even if I think Biden's admin is full of woke buttholes, and Biden himself is a senile zombie, even if i had to endure the mockery of democrat wokeness and insanity, I would not abide in letting the Ukrainians out to dry, even if nobody would ever thank me
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Trump has no morals nor scruples or politics beyond being the center of attention and being President just for the sake of it. The GOP has policies, Donald Trump does not, he is a narcissist grifter using the GOP as a means for power so he employs a conservative rhetoric (for instance he panders to evangelicals despite being probably an atheist at heart lol) and follows stuff like judicial appointments based on the party's recommendations. His foreign policy is atrocious, just dull "America First" isolationism which is unsuitable for a global superpower like the United States. The way he handled his cabinet was extremely amateurish, incompetent and unprofessional. He's pretty much a sorrowful joke of a statesman.
At least for me voting for someone like Trump is acceptable only against candidates like Bernie Sanders, RFK Jr or other kinds of leftist loonies.
!neolibs
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
good example of Trump Derangement Syndrome right here !chuds !nooticers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Full enforcement of the Monroe Doctrine and the re-incorporation of Panama as a protectorate is a prerequisite to me caring, and that's not going to happen.
@Redactor0 I'm now sexually harassing you for an opinion
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's just like my Starslop!![:marseysoypoint: :marseysoypoint:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseysoypoint.webp)
https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Tarkin_Doctrine
!kino
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Brain broke long ago, but I'll make do![:marseyschizowave: :marseyschizowave:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseyschizowave.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I blame Paul Verhoeven for all of this..
!kino
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I don't really know what to do with Europe. It would be bad for both sides if we just suddenly left. But the situation we've had for the last 70 years (my parents' generation, my generation, the generation after that) where we pay for their defense in exchange for nothing needs to end. Maybe make a deal with some country that's more on our wavelength like Poland so we can have some bases there in exchange for protection.
In Asia we need to be doubling down on all the alliances we made from WW2 and the Korean War to deal with China. Especially we need to put massive resources into building up the Philippines (I still can't spell that). I'm pretty sure that even if I didn't have personal reasons for wanting to protect it, that country is the key to all of Asia. It's right in the middle of everything, it's got lots of land, lots of harbors, lots of people who like America and especially like the US military. Why in the heck aren't we making this the first priority of our foreign policy?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lmao I was worked up about the Flips and the nine-dash line last night. Panama beating the US men's team fired up the "double the fleet tonnage" in me
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I argued for that lmao. Everyone wins with a !americas free of commies.
Yeah, I'm a foreigner that's why I didn't even bother watching the debate. I just gave an honest opinion answering to another foreigner
@kaamrev then I woke up today and got like 30 notifications on it lol, wingcucks accusing me of TDS ![:marseyxd: :marseyxd:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseyxd.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I am once again asking !chuds and !nonchuds alike to read Playboy's March 1990 interview with Donald Trump. His policies are far more consistent than people give him credit for. He also had more foresight than people give him credit for, though that's declined with age and... Well, you'll see it in his own words.![:marseytrump: :marseytrump:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseytrump.webp)
Note: You should really read the whole thing, but here's a particularly relevant portion:
The biggest changes between 1990 and 2016 were changes in the country and the world, not changes in Trump. Running as a Republican rather than a Democrat because they became the party of working-class men, putting tariffs on China rather than Japan because they became the East Asian economic powerhouse threatening American industry, etc. Trump's actual attitude towards governance and perspective on policy hadn't changed a bit. He even unknowingly predicted his own downfall in 2020 when he described what would happen to Mikhail Gorbachev and what had happened to Ed Koch.![:marseytrumpitsover: :marseytrumpitsover:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseytrumpitsover.webp)
You're welcome to disagree with Trump's policies (Lord knows I do), but the suggestion he doesn't have any just isn't true. It's something the Democratic Party and their affiliated media outlets came up with because it was easier than trying to understand him, and people have been parroting it ever since.![:marseynpc2: :marseynpc2:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseynpc2.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's remarkable how close his thinking parallels with those presidents from Truman till Kennedy where they thought a nuclear war was not something abstract like today's presidents. It could definitely happen.
But even more remarkably it also mirrors most of the realist leaders of today like Putin, Modi, Netanyahu (or whoever might their replacments be), that just because nuke possessing countries won't escalate to firing nukes randomly, doesn't mean an escalation to a hot war between two nuke capable countries would not happen (India - Pakistan '98) (India - China 2020), (Iran - Israel).
He would have made an amazing war theorist.
Amazing.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
But but but Trump BAD!![:marseysoycry: :marseysoycry:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseysoycry.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is simultaneously true.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
TRVKE
The only people who claim their country can be a superpower by being isolationists are r-slurs:
Rome and Britain became empires by good foreign policy (local governance and Pax Romana), Wakanda isn't real and Serbia won't become a world power by fighting with all their neighbors and making everything around them shittier.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
America's retreat from global affairs will just empower China and Russia. But America Firsters r-slurs don't care for that, that's why Foreign Policy should never be "democratized", the general public is simply too stupid to be trusted on geopolitical matters.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
lol this is a good bait account (I hope)
you should change your name to neocon/neolib shill
!chuds !neolibs
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Nah. US has lost mandate of heavens and now zealots are going nuts
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
That's what it was
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Maybe. US intervention could've also made things much worse. It's like creating a bunch of Vietnams or North Koreas around the world. Seems really dumb because "China or Russia might do the same thing." Okay, let them. Peak hubris was invading Iraq a second time and believing that they could install a democracy. That's the pinnacle of the US's foreign policy as of late. It's r-slurred and made things worse.
The only recent foreign intervention by the US which made sense was the first US-Iraq war. No "regime change." And the US got most of the Arab states to foot the bill.
Tell me. How did invading Libya and killing Gaddafi make the world better off? Aren't they still in a civil war? Last I checked they were torn into three factions. Very productive.
Let the weapons flow to more radicals too, but at least China and Russia didn't do that themselves.
Invading Afghanistan was a fun one too. The Soviets learned well (and oh no they invaded a country! That should be the US's job!) It was so pointless. It knocked the Afghanis back another 20 years, and they ended up with the Taliban. Let them have the Taliban. Who cares? Expand hum int resources drastically, make connections, and pay them to capture and give you bin Laden instead. Or just dump resources into long-range drone strikes and missile strikes. (Of course, the funniest thing was finding bin Laden in Pakistan--a country the US has given billions too).
US foreign policy after the 90s has been a on a tremendously stupid losing streak.
!historychads, !chuds, !anyone who cares about foreign policy!![:marseybottom: :marseybottom:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseybottom.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm not referring to military intervention. Isolationism (pre-1940s) implied cutting off from world affairs but you don't need to use military action to protect it, the mere existence of NATO and the pacific treaties with Japan and South Korea protect those countries. Same with trade deals like NAFTA.
The America First isolationists favored cutting any sort of material aid to Britain in 1940 for instance and they do the same with Ukraine, that's the sort of stuff which is not applicable in the modern world where the US is a global superpower.
Military action should indeed be used with caution but there's no need to retreat from world affairs, there are many ways to influence it.
!neolibs
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Just nuke anyone who starts mouthing off.
Especially euros
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Overthrowing Gaddafi was stupid, at least the way we did it. But everyone these days forgets that he funded terrorism all over the world. The whole concept of terrorism as we know it owes a lot to Gaddafi and the groups he supported. None of his terrorists pulled off a 9-11 but it doesn't mean they weren't trying. He put a heck of a lot more money into it than all the Islamic fundamentalists.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/how-libya-got-list
It also mentions how well he steered away from funding terrorism as early as 2003!
There were foreign policy articles raving about how well a dictator can be swayed by non-interventionist means. He was a shining example to other dictators of the Middle East. Aaaaand, the US destroyed all of that by invading him, so may as well go hard.
Like I said, US foreign policy has increaingnly become counter-productive.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
You don't need to invade anything. It's really easy. All you do is wait for Russia/China to go full r-slur, give Ukraine/Taiwain enough firepower to bleed them dry and you're all good.
As for terrorism, you get the frick out of the Middle east and you let them kill each other while they forget about you. Maybe you drone strike the odd idiot that starts planning too much.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Shut up, ya dumb b-word.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I agree with you on intervention outside the Americas, but we've got two big, frick-off oceans and too many uppity latinx that have decided they should be able to partner with China in our backyard.
I'll get drunk later and come back to argue as a Bush era neo-con
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Are you drunk yet?![:marseygossip: :marseygossip:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseygossip.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Let Ivan and Chang drink the poisoned chalice of empire. Their own history is riddled of the monumental failure it entails.![:marseyevil: :marseyevil:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseyevil.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Neo-cons don't live in reality
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Russia is barely a regional power at this point so they'll keep poking their neighbors regardless of who wins. Their only mistake was straying from central Asia, which the West doesn't honestly care about, and messing with Ukraine instead since that's a little to close for Europe's liking. Georgia really got shafted on that one.
China though is another story and that would be a huge mistake not to confront their ambitions.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Russia is a great power in decay, their economy is weak and their demographic outlook is bad. But a wounded snake is not a harmless one, they'll continue to be a pain in the butt in the short term.
China is the biggest long term threat to the Western World, almost all of Africa is now under their sphere on influence and they have a growing one in LATAM.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
If you argue like that the general public is too stupid to be trusted on any matter (true)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
If you're so anti-Democracy why do you care if China or Russia is empowered other than for an ingroup affinity for the West?
Democracy is the art and science of running the circus from the monkey cage.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I said Foreign Policy, not domestic policy.
Foreign policy making requires long term thinking, a state policy which can last for years and not be subjected to abrupt change every 4 years.
Domestic policy is completely different and requires societal discussion.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Tell that to Woodrow Wilson
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's not completely different, often there are foreign policies that impact domestic policy, and domestic policies that impact foreign policy. Trade, immigration, migration, treaties on citizenship, disarmament, trade secrets and intellectual property etc.
Nothing in this world is capable of being in a vacuum. Keeping state neutrality because you don't trust domestic or foreign policy leadership with making good choices is actually good policy, because why go into Iraq and Afghanistan if we're just going to blow it after spending 20 trillion cool ones?
Democracy is the art and science of running the circus from the monkey cage.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Because I am American and the weak should fear the strong
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Where are the Roman and British Empires now?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Dead after they ignored domestic affairs. You need both.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
True about his cabinet selection and being disorganized, he said he would've given weapons to Ukraine earlier, rather than Obama's blankets. Of course, that's his word, and I don't have the data on arms shipments to Ukraine from 2020-2024.
He does have a "don't frick with me" persona that's good for geopolitics and more aggressive types. Biden is as intimidating as a wet blanket.
The main thing that has me voting against Democrats is all the legal but gray area bullshit they throw on Trump starting with Russiagate and still ongoing. It strikes me as tampering with the result of the 2020 election, and it's a shit strategy for a liberal democracy in a first world country. Just take the L and work harder for the next presidential election. If they didn't pull all that shit, which contributed partly to his disorganization, I wouldn't be considering a vote this around.
!neolibs, the funny thing about the tariffs was that Biden never lifted them. They were dumb for Trump to do, but still
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Accurate.
This is why all BPDmaxxers should vote for Trump
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
he panders! who else would do something so sick and depraved?
oh right: every single fricking politician in the history of the universe!
True tbh.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
What politician isnt?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Cuck
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I used to think I was a rightoid, before rightoids both in the US and europe 100% pivoted to the lowest uneducated r-slurs, 5th columnists, oligarchs![:marseycry: :marseycry:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseycry.webp)
!boomers was it always this bad, or was I just too young to notice? Was Bush, Saint Thatcher and the rest of the gang this bad too?
Admittedly I haven't really followed US politics.![:marseyautism: :marseyautism:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseyautism.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
reminds me of my boomer father and uncles whom are avid environmentalists and preservationists,
but because of hippies and Greens, it's like pivot their worldview in disgust to be contrarian, and now completely deny the very notion of climate change, to combat global warming hysteria
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
why misrepresent your own family? Obviously the "climate changes" no one would deny that. They likely have an issue with the idea of AGW and the thousands of failed predictions of catastrophe. Plus when they were kids they were told about "global cooling" and warned that the planet would freeze over, when ppl realized that was bull now they are told the opposite.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
they weren't told that if they were kids at the time.
unlike today, where half the school year is dedicated to the holocaust and the other half to global warming, back then global cooling was not part of the curriculum.
there were a dozen research articles and a dozen popular science articles about this theory.
50 years later, wingcucks retcon history to claim this was a wide-spread narrative, comparable to global warming in the 90s and later. which it never was.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's dumb too, there are so many ways to attack the r-slurred environmentalists without going all in on rightoid delusions. Just go out and enjoy hunting and shit while dumping on the environmentalists for screwing up nuclear power and starving the third world by being anti-GMO.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It wasn't this bad. Romney was the nominee in 2012 and he was a totally normal conservative. It's funny back then Romney even said Russia was the greatest security rival of the US and Obama had some zinger about the Cold War calling and wanting its foreign policy back, and all the lib media ate it up. It's crazy how everything has been turned on its head.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Feel like shit, just want him back
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
you went the opposite direction. you should have been a libtard when you were young, THEN you understand that rightoids are correct when you grow up !chuds
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
"If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain."
"If you're a conservative when you're 25 and a liberal by the time you're 35, then you're just some kind of r-slurred cute twink"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
My favorite LBJ quote
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Wrong.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Take it up with Churchill he's the one the quote is falsely attributed to
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Honestly I'll support whichever party seems to uphold the standards of meritocracy, open competitive markets and democracy better. I don't care about cultural issues at all, I don't think that's the states responsibility.![:marseythumbsup: :marseythumbsup:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseythumbsup.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
so definitely not the democrats
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Not everyone has to get it wrong.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Reagan and Bush you can disagree with a lot but at least they didn't want to betray the country like Republicans now. That's something that really only came with Trump. Before him, loving Russia was considered, you know, kind of left-wing. But Trump praised Putin, Xi Jinping, etc. and the MAGAtards instantly threw away any principles they pretended to have and went full communist.
The Russians had funded a few politicians in the US before that, like Ron Paul, but they were always fringe weirdos until Trump.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Rightoids would have gladly gone to war ahead of the stars and stripes but the dems replaced the American flag that patriots fought and died under with a symbol for brown people and butt cute twinkry.
Did you r-slurs really not see this coming?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
you're lost
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're the one simping for straggotry on rdrama.net
TW: scary rainbow
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
They don't love russia, they just hate (You)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The Stars and Stripes also represent those people though?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Redactor is a TDS sufferer? Lmao wtf I thought u were based
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I am based. Based on the principles our Founding Fathers laid out.
The reason I hate left-wing bullshit so much is that used to be my side before they went woke. So I hate them for destroying our country and stabbing me in the back too.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Good then it's not too late for you. Trump is the spitting image of Benjamin Franklin, maybe even him reincarnated.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Benjamin Franklin would never take a mistress as young as Stormy Daniels. GILFs only.![:marseywalllove:](https://i.rdrama.net/i/love-foreground.webp)
![:marseywalllove:](https://i.rdrama.net/i/love-background.webp)
![:marseywalllove:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseywall.webp)
"Frick old bitches. If they're too ugly, put a bag on their head." ~ Benjamin Franklin, the only based straggot in history.![:marseypaperbaglove:](https://i.rdrama.net/i/love-foreground.webp)
![:marseypaperbaglove:](https://i.rdrama.net/i/love-background.webp)
![:marseypaperbaglove:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseypaperbag.webp)
Unless !historychads know of another? 'cause I'm pretty sure it's just our boy here.![](https://i.rdrama.net/i/hand.webp)
![:marseyfranklinpat:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseyfranklin.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I don't know enough about Benjamin Franklin to deny this.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Woke is an honest reaction to the unhumanness of the world. They can't help being r-slurred, having spawned from an r-slured world.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
what a childish view of politics.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
My formative years were the 90s, I can't support a party that hates people on the basis of their race and gender and passes laws that enforce discrimination on that basis.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
same
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
This is really the defining issue for me. Trump clearly wants to leave NATO and let the russoids ZOV their way across Europe.
It's a shame the dems have to be the big tent party and pander to commies who won't vote for them and how they prop up a genuine corpse, but Biden's as close to a !neolibs victory as it's going to get
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The Russoids couldn't zerg their way through an empty parking lot, which is what Ukraine basically was at the beginning of the war and Trump wanting to leave NATO is standard TDS hysteria from when he correctly told Eurocucks to start honoring their treaty obligations and bump spending.
Still, if he wins I hope the MIC wines and dines him enough to keep sending weapons to Ukraine. I want to see a T-34 destroyed by a Javelin.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Would you even want to use a Javelin for a T-34? There's been like 50 years of armor and anti-armor advancements between them. The M72 LAW would destroy them for 200x less the cost.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Even a single 5.56mm is more valuable than the russian life it will extinguish.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yes, because overkill is hilarious.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
lol u don't think Ukraine is really gonna win this conflict do you? Don't you see the writing on the wall?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
nobody will "win."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
There is probably a Ukrainian rump state around at the end of the war and if theyre lucky its like 75% of the size of 2013 Ukraine. Compared with being ruled by Russiggers that is a huge win.
Long term all Slav countries are fricked except the Western Slavs
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I don't care what happens to Europe, they can deal with their own affairs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They can't and that's the problem.
Americans have no idea how much of the current global order and peace is thanks to the US projecting power, the "multipolar world" which the isolationists aspire to return was a violent one filled with wars.
America retreating means weaker countries being fed to the vultures.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think we have a pretty good idea and I'm tired of paying the bill for other countries to spit in our face.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Don't think the US does it out of charity.
The EU countries are strong, reliable US partners, not just diplomatically but economically as well.
Isolationism means empowering China while weakening the US. Since the end of the WW2 the US has been atop the free world, during the Cold War the US enforced the Monroe Doctrine because having hostile regimes in your backyard is a dangerous thing. With allies you can trade and mutually benefit while enemy regimes surrounding you will simply cut you from the rest of the world damaging your economy while they get stronger.
Are the EU countries failing in certain aspects? Yes, they should for instance provide 2% of their GDPs for their militaries as required by NATO, it's unfair for the US to do 90% of the heavy lifting. But it's something that can be talked and both parts would benefit from a new agreement.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
so what is your real point of contention? That is all Trump asked for and its more than reasonable
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Send more planes b-word
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
You're paying the bill to keep valuable markets open, r-slur.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Markets for gay s*x and abortions. That's all Europeans care about![:marseyeyeroll: :marseyeyeroll:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseyeyeroll.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Good
Weak countries don't deserve to exist
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What is weakness?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
be careful or you might choke on it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I don't see the problem as long as they keep it in their countries.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If your globalist empire collapses your wealth will be significantly diminished
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
These r-slurs are seemingly oblivious to the facts that the US is so rich in the first place, because it can leverage it's efficiency through open markets and free trade.
They seemingly thing in a mercantile world those evil rich people will just love everything, while Bubba in bumfrick Alabama could keep his relatively cushy factory job.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
They never keep in in their countries.
Multipolar world led to WW1 and WW2
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
"They can deal with their own affairs" is exactly how an empire falls.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Empire is Overrated.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Burgers might change their tune when there's an eastern commie hegemony, Europe is half Russia and half Balkanized, and the U.S. is full of people saying "we'll be a superpower again if we just adopt $R-SLURRED_IDEOLOGY"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Russia had to back off their main thrusts into Ukraine before western aid arrived in any real amount. I'm all for continuing to turn Ukraine into a Russian graveyard, but there's zero chance they actually try to take on NATO, especially now.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Have you seen the state of a modern europoor?
I hope russoids r*pe them to death
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The Somalis are already doing that
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Rightoid !macacos support each and every single Drumpflermort and Amerimutt MAGNeurodivergent policy, except for their fricktarded trend of peepeesucking Russia, a prostitution and alcoholism-ridden Soviet LARPing shithole who funds third-world lef
shitholes like Venezuela, North Korea, China, Cuba, and Islamic theocracies that !latinx and South African Rightoids hate, so of course the South American, African, and Asian rightoids fricking despise Russia, and this is their major beef and schism with the GOP and other rightoids in Europe.
In here, the LGBTQIAP2S+ university soyjaks with hammer and sickles in their Twitter bios are the ones with a boner for Putin and smashing muh Western Fascist Imperialism genociding le heckin Global South
, while in the US, it is the opposite demographic who cucks out to Russia, just change the word "Nazi Imperialism" with "Woke Globalism" and there you go ![:marseyxd: :marseyxd:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseyxd.webp)
!neolibs
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
!grillers if they weren't so r-slurred all the time, I would congratulate the Russkies on how well they cynically manipulate wingcucks around the world...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's simple, despite not being communist anymore Russia inherited the USSR's allies, so they put their propaganda machine to help pink tide leftoids in latin america, simping and making apologia for Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela and Bolivia.
In Europe it is the far-right who is fond of BASED and TRAD Russia (which is how the Russian Nationalists in power unironically see themselves) so I guess their true colors are the ones shown in Europe and the US.
!neolibs !anticommunists
In other words, for it's LATAM allies Putin is the closest thing they have to Lenin and for Eurorightoids Russia cucks (RN, Fidesz, AfD) he is BASED Tsar Vladimir I
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
this is all part of the grift.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Biggest commie propaganda outlet in LATAM besides maybe Telesur !latinx !macacos those of you who speak spanish/portuguese check RT in those languages and the comment sections, the most braindead leftoid boomers and anti-westerncels comment on there.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
oh, so an average /r/Brasil day
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Should be:
If anyone thinks Russia, Chingchongland, Iran, et al aren't taking part in information warfare by manipulating r-slurs (80% of the global population) idk what to tell you
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Brazil's relationship with Russia is complex. Bolsonaro wasn't fond of them, but he wasn't willing to torpedo our trade relations for virtue signaling (our agriculture relies a lot on Russian fertilizer) and I remember the media calling Bozo a Putin simp for that.
Meanwhile Lula actually blamed Ukraine and played a "le both sides" as some conciliatory bullshit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I mean take a look at how political culture in the US diverges from the rest of the world, in South America, Africa, and Asia, the pro-Russia crowd are overwhelmingly the "anti-imperialist" Commies and corrupt "Social Democrats" who think that Ukrainians are Nazis and Russia is carrying on the legacy of the USSR against Western Imperialism and Fascism, meanwhile, the Brazilian/thirdie "Putin will save the White race from globohomo degeneracy" rightoid crowd are a tiny irrelevant minority mainly secluded to literally who imageboards and telegram groups that no one gives a frick about, they tend to mainly speak in English and congregate together with American rightoid and Western European populists, because they are the only rightoids in the world who support Russia.
Here is a video by Ian Neves, the most famous Brazilian commie breadtuber who looks like this
(no, he has not
ed out yet) where he and his blue haired tranime avatar LGBTQIAP2S+ groomercord crowd spend their entire time pooping on Ukraine and shilling for Russia, while in the US, the blue hair LGBTQIAP2SBIPOC+ tranime avatar crowd are the ones who shit on Russia and spam SLAVA OINKRAINE 24/7!
This also reminds me of a video I cannot find right now, it was some Russian
, this propaganda piece is directed towards the third-world shitholes, and there was also another vid of a Russian rural tradwife washing her clothes in a farm near a church, this latter one is directed towards the Amerimutt crowd, Russia simultaneously tries to pivot towards leftoids and rightoids depending on who they are sending a message to ![:marseyhorseshoe: :marseyhorseshoe:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseyhorseshoe.webp)
escorte-thot model cosplaying a Soviet soldier saying how much she loves Arab men!neolibs !chuds !macacos !latinx !anticommunists
@kaamrev
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Modern Russia is currently in this weird position where they're no longer communist but inherited the Soviet Union's client states (Cuba for instance). So they throw a bone at them not because they're commies, but because it helps maintain their global influence.
It's a shame really because post-USSR Russia could benefit enormously from good economic and trade relations with Europe and the US, but Putin is keen on reviving some sort of tsarist autocracy, pan-slavism, Russian nationalism. He's convinced the US and Europe are against Russia and that they're working to undermine Russia's interests.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
it's fitting though, because russians are completely r-slurred and their own politics don't even make sense internally
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
They are though
Anyways Russians need to suffer more if we want a revival of sovlfvll Russian literature, they had it too good the last few decades.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Pan-Slavism is a codeword for Russian imperialism.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I thought Metro 2033 was preddy gud
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
But America is against it.
see e.g. pipelines![:marseymushroomcloud: :marseymushroomcloud:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseymushroomcloud.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Natural outcome after Dubai potty training.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I am searching for it hold on lol it is too much fricking funny and eye-opening, I think that the title was in Arabic, something like "المرأة الروسية تحب العراق"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Somebody sounds bitter. Did a Russian girl break your heart?
!nooticers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Russian
foids
only date good men
I don't think
a Russian
foid can ever give him heart
break
Glory to Russia!![:marseysaluteussr: :marseysaluteussr:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseysaluteussr.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
AI ALERT!!!!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!marseyartists back me up here. that russian Marsey is an AI work aint it?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
where are these rightoids that supposedly love russia so much?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the face of a man who appreciates bread
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's literally just you. You are the only one that believes this, I don't know where you are getting you get your information but you are incorrect.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
lolwat? where are the rightoids that love russia?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You are the only one I have ever met that believes this. I've literally never seen a rightoid that likes Putin or Russia. You are clearly making this up.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Russia did not make any territory gains while Trump was president. They, along with Iran and China, ran roughshod when Biden and Obama have been president. Saying Trump is pro-Russia has no semblance of truth to it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Only the r-slurred nothing burgers are actually pro-Russia- the Russia apologetics from MAGA leaders is mostly along the lines of 'I am the only one who knows how to handle russia'
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I have the best plan, believe me folks, many people are saying my plan will bring us peace before I enter office
![:marseykneel: :marseykneel:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseykneel.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Neither party is leaving the Ukrainians out to dry. It's difficult to describe the size of the American military industry but if the US isn't fighting or funding a war, those companies start to go broke, lose talent, etc.
The Ukraine war is basically a stimulus that gives them all the money of a small war without the cost of American lives. Most of the politicians against it are just doing it for political points (criticizing war is an American pass time).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Being from South Africa and seeing what's happening there, I imagined you'd be more based than that (demographic change).
Besides I think Trump would be more likely to end the Ukraine/Russia forever war sooner than Biden, and thus stop more deaths from occuring.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't fully grasp the relevance?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Saving some (many?) Ukrainians is admirable, but saving the US from turning into a third world due to mass immigration is even more important, and Trump is more likely to help that cause than Biden.
So I'm surprised you'd vote for Biden because of that.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Trump often differs from the MAGA base, remember how it was popular to be pro-Assad in 2015-17 on the dissident right and left, yet Trump wanted to kill him?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Unless you're a Uke, why would you support stuff that destroys your society to save a corrupt NATO puppetstate?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Cuz God hates Ziggers, and im a good Christian
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jewhova hates everybody and wants them to serve Israel, so why bother pleasing him?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Sometimes you wonder if rightoid wingcucks are genuienly this r-slurred or paid shills, because nobody can possibly be this stupid.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What do you want America to do about it? Nuke them? Ukraine was never going to win this war dummy
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Doesn't seem like it, so far.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wow Europoors really are r-slurred
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh sorry was this performance supposed to be the great might of the Russian military?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
So, how much are we benefiting from this now? Just another 3 years, bro. NATO countries are losing a hub for bioweapons labs, money laundering, and child porn.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If they completely destroyed their societies to stop Hitler, what would be the point?
NATO kept trying to box Russia in on spite of agreements, kept talking war with them, and even pointed missiles at their country. I don't blame Russia for invading, especially when you consider the Ukraine kept bombing the Russia part of the countries for 8 years leading up to this. Many bad things our governments do that drag our societies down are done there. I'd rather Russia get Eastern Ukraine if our real enemies are hindered, even a little bit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What the frick are you even talking about lmao
NATO and the EU tried to build closer relationship with Russia all through the 90s, they closed their eyes when Russia invaded Georgia in 2008, and did it again when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014. It didn't even agree to send any heavy weapons into Ukraine before Russia tried to completely occupy it.
It was Ukrainian territory, that the russians occupied, after attacking Ukraine and kept shooting at Ukrainian position from it, after returning fire and breaking every attempt at a ceasefire.
You are either a demoralized r-slur who acts like I'm sure some parisian did on the eve of 1939, thinking after all these appeasements Hitler will surely stop or just a zigger, idk which one is worse and I don't really care anymore either, you are probably just baiting anyways.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
the US benefits from expanding NATO, which is why Russia starts wars to prevent it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We just do worse and worse at home. When do we start to benefit?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
you don't know how much worse things could be without it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Weak countries get consumed by stronger countries. It's the natural state of things and a sign of a healthy balance of power
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
!vips !winners
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Inshallah 🙏 you ever find your way over here, I will frame you for immigration fraud.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Return my 30k dc and I'll vote biden for you w photo proof
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Same, standing up to the bullshit of vatziggers is one of the most important factors I would vote for someone.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Trump is very malleable
He'll get in office and CIA/NSA show him satellite /Intel shit of all the stuff they are doing in Ukraine and he'll look up to the generals like a kid and listen to their insistence on bucking Russia. All that will happen is he'll whine about money while the US war machine continues at full speed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i'll cope and pray this is the case, because Putin and Ukraine are literally in an endurance show-off explicitly to last just until this November yank election
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I know, that's why I consider DeSantis way more dangerous than him, and I was very happy that DeSantis did bad in the primary.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's rude to discount the monumental boost in the high heeled men's shoe industry his primary run produced. He changed an entire industry overnight simply by existing. That's how fabulous he is.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Nah, DDR has a mancrush on Putin
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Trump also is obsessed with appearing strong and assertive. Putin will have to play tough guy now. The context of their relationship has changed. Trump will get into office and he'll have to come up with a 'solution' and everyone will be like "just fund them for another year while Russia runs out of shit and then we'll have a better negotating hand" etc. Then it will never stop for 4yrs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That is what he did with Afghanistan. Just keep it going because he didn't know what else to do.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Russia's been running out of shit for years, while Ukraine needs so much stuff to replace stuff they already received that western nations are running low on their own supplies. I don't think Russia's going to run out of stuff anytime soon.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Russias also losing armour at like 20-1 to Ukraine, they run multiple armoured assaults daily where they lose 2 IFVs and a tank while one might get away unharmed x2-3 + lots of rear FPV strikes, while Russia will post a single video of a Ukraine armoured getting hit by a lancet + some random vehicles or an MRAP.
Anyone paying attention to OSINT documentation can see that this dynamic is not sustainable for either party. Both can continue with Russias war economy and NATOs huge amounts of money.
But only one side needs to show progress. Ukraine merely has to survive.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Now the Ukraine only needs to survive? That's some goalpost moving. These same people telling us all this are the same ones insisting the Ukraine was having these amazing victories with 17-year-old models becoming snipers who kill 150 Russians within a week of getting their first sniper rifle. Surely these guys are telling you the truth now.
Also, losing a quarter of your territory is a massive loss, even if you survive in the end. What if the US lost the entire East Coast in a war? Would that not matter?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Russia's already fielding tanks from the 50's and civilian vehicles to move troops around. They'll never 'run out' since they had stupidly vast reserves of old Soviet gear, and even as that runs low they'll just attempt smaller assaults to stretch that out.
While Europe is probably running low on some stuff (thanks to their decades of under spending) Russia has been so messed up that a direct NATO confrontation is unthinkable for them, which was the whole point. I would love for Ukraine to win the war, but the West's goal was to bleed Russia dry of modern military equipment and if the war ended tomorrow, that's been done. I doubt any Western power is willing to commit the forces necessary to guarantee actually winning this thing, and that includes Trump and Biden.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The West is losing control of previously conquered countries to nogs and guys who live in mud huts in recent years. It's hard to believe they're in a position of strength here, especially when you consider the Marvel-tier propaganda going on earlier in the war. A bunch of countries joined BRICS, the petrodollar is ending, and a good chunk of Ukrainians are dead or fled the country. France also lost control over Niger, and is losing control over Africa, and can't do anything but give up. Whatever plans they had are r-slurred beyond belief.
Besides, that fancy western equipment must be shit if they lose to 70 year old tanks in Russia and to guys with old weapons and Hiluxes elsewhere.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ah, you're one of those types. Because the US did its dumb shit in Afghanistan and Iraq (basically hang around for decades without a concrete plan which is sadly the norm) and eventually got tired of it and left, that must mean they lost to a bunch of hut dwellers and are in actuality really, really weak.
US Losses over 2 decades:
Iraq - 4,431
Afghanistan - 1,922
That's called a bad week for Russia who, 3 years later, still hasn't taken over 1/4 of their poor as frick neighbor and is rolling out equipment from the 50's. If Russia won the war tomorrow, this showing is still hilariously bad, not to mention a disaster for their military readiness going forward. Keep on
'ing
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
truth nuke
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's proven in the Steele Dossier. He paid hookers to pee on Obama's hotel bed!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Isn't that fake news? Or just the tape was fake?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's just (always has been) hearsay.
Trump being bizarrely capitulous to Putin fueled the rumor.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
when did that happen?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
it's as true as all of Russiagate
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
dude bussy
lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It is. Just like how Trump loving Russia is a conspiracy theory Democrats spent years promoting. Ukraine was completely safe under Trump while Putin took territory while Obama and Biden were in office.
This doesn't even mention the Afghanistan disaster or how Biden capitulates to China and Iran. Biden's foreign policy record dating back 30 years might be the single weakest thing about him
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I hope you're right, but I wouldn't be too sure about this.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Never bet against the US love for war, they love it more than Russia
Obama said he'd end the Iraq/Afghanistan war, pretty strongly. Then all he did in office was the surge and massively expanding the black war with drones strikes and CIA shit...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
go be poor somewhere else zigger
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
seethe
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
dilate
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
poortuguese
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Proudly
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
LMAO, your country was cucked by BIPOCs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
BBCphobia
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh no, you got me wrong. I love that you and all the other Afrikaners are forced to live in a pro-Russian country.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
And yours was cucked by albanians, which is even more embarassing.![:marseyxd: :marseyxd:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseyxd.webp)
(Along with croats, b*snians and so on, but let's just focus on the funniest one)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And your country was cucked by us in WW1, so how pathetic are you?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Serbia was wiped out.
Luckily the western powers you are so ungrateful to rescued you.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
LMAO, we cucked you with an army way smaller than yours. You had to get Bulgarians to attack us in order to stand a chance. And your empire was still destroyed after that, while Yugoslavia continued to exist.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Serbia disappeared off the map by 1915? Luckily the USA, Britain and France came to rescue you, be grateful to your betters![:marseysaluteusa: :marseysaluteusa:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseysaluteusa.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Counterpoint:
More dead ziggers = more happiness in the world
I support happiness
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
This seems to be a popular view lol same
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
But it doesn't matter who is going to win. Biden needs to end it before election to get it as democratic victory, Trump need to prolong it until he wins the election to call it republican victory. If Biden loses democrats start pushing to continue the fight since they won't want to give this victory to Trump.
Objectively the results of this election will play zero roles.
Zelenskyy wants now to just give Russian part of Donbas it controls and get back Kherson and Zaphorozie.
But why would Russia leave positions it solid controls and last year even easily owned spring counteroffensive?
Putin says he wants full control of his oblast (it's just offer he knows Zelenskyy won't fulfil even tho from historical pov it will be lucked as very good one for Ukraine just like we now look at 2022 peace offer)
Trump wants to freeze the front
Russia again have no reason to agree on this
So it's a dead end
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context