Please welcome our possible new friend and also the complainant, @Underprotest, who appears to have been grievously wronged by some antisocial elements in the thread here:
As is our custom, we will now dedicate the pinned comment in this thread to Ms. @Underprotest's case for the deletion of the thread above. The trial will run for 48 hours and the results are binding. You may change your verdict at any time between now and then.
Making fun of stuff that people willingly posted online is one thing, deliberately trying to trick and mislead somebody for lols is another. Ban MAGAshill.
I feel that making a bait sub where you post scary stuff to troll people out in the public light is kind of different from entering into personal, direct conversations with individuals and then tricking them. On public online forums there is more of an assumption that people are free to troll and say whatever they want, they're known and acknowledged spaces for having fun and trolling. In direct personal conversation, whether it's right or wrong to be more trusting, I think most people will want to extend a certain assumption of trustworthiness to the other person.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Making fun of stuff that people willingly posted online is one thing, deliberately trying to trick and mislead somebody for lols is another. Ban MAGAshill.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
this site has been doing that since texasbountyhunters wtf you on about
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I feel that making a bait sub where you post scary stuff to troll people out in the public light is kind of different from entering into personal, direct conversations with individuals and then tricking them. On public online forums there is more of an assumption that people are free to troll and say whatever they want, they're known and acknowledged spaces for having fun and trolling. In direct personal conversation, whether it's right or wrong to be more trusting, I think most people will want to extend a certain assumption of trustworthiness to the other person.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context