Please welcome our possible new friend and also the complainant, @Underprotest, who appears to have been grievously wronged by some antisocial elements in the thread here:
As is our custom, we will now dedicate the pinned comment in this thread to Ms. @Underprotest's case for the deletion of the thread above. The trial will run for 48 hours and the results are binding. You may change your verdict at any time between now and then.
Killing removes a person from the future, not the past (which is already set). Therefore the current and past existence of the entity you remove from the timeline doesn't matter. The only crime is the destroyed potential.
This all got settled at the Temporal Continuity Accord of 2067, but I forgot it hasn't happened yet
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Miscarriage is only sad because unborn children are babies and have the inherent right to life.
Pro-choicers know this but can't admit it
!christians
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Miscarriage is sad because it upsets the prospective parents who wanted a kid. The kid never existed and doesn't know the difference.
Abortion is good because it keeps people who don't want kids from having them. The kid never existed and doesn't know the difference.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If someone kills you in your sleep, you don't know the difference
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There's a difference between being asleep and not existing at all. Are you r-slurred?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If it doesn't exist, then what are you killing?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Nothing? That's my whole point. Nobody is being killed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Killing removes a person from the future, not the past (which is already set). Therefore the current and past existence of the entity you remove from the timeline doesn't matter. The only crime is the destroyed potential.
This all got settled at the Temporal Continuity Accord of 2067, but I forgot it hasn't happened yet
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Okay so you're r-slurred. Thanks for clearing that up.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think if I actually tried to debate this on here I would be r-slurred
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Remember if you shoot and kill a pregnant woman its a double-homicide but if she don't want it then it's "just a clump of cells."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
^ has not and will not ever breed
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context