Here is him announcing his "W" that is literally a L if you actually check the vote totals
https://rdrama.net/post/286131/charges-dropped-in-uitsnottreasonyet-v-peoples
Proof of the miscarriage of justice:
https://rdrama.net/post/286131/charges-dropped-in-uitsnottreasonyet-v-peoples/6731585#context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Abortion is a grave moral evil, science demonstrates that life begins at conception and !Catholics have correctly opposed the practice of all forms of child sacrifice from the beginning (Didache ~80AD).
Your moral reasoning is confused and inconsistent, which is both typical and regrettable of rdramatards. Killing children is fricked up.![:marseysadge: :marseysadge:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseysadge.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Welcome back
@Corinthian, I missed you.
If someone is braindead their body is still alive, their heart is beating, and their body is still a life, yet the person is already gone. This why it's not only "life" that is needed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There's a hurricane currently over Luzon !pinoypride so it's whatever I can't really go out and form a life apart from you r-slurs but I do genuinely enjoy that you engage with me on what I think is an honest level(?) rather than just doing the insincere
strategy of "winning" by getting the other person to lose their cool a la sjw-freakout content from decades past.
Your argument is one that !Catholics bioethicists have considered and the soyience is faulty and debated.
I genuinely propose that all human life is inviolably, equally endowed with the dignity and likeness of God. I think you hold that principle (minus God) in your own ethics, and I encourage you with 100% sincerity to examine the priors and science that would challenge your notions of what constitutes "life".![:carpholyspirit: :carpholyspirit:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/carpholyspirit.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So is it murder to pull the life support when someone is declared brain dead?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Well the equivocation fails: all human life requires gestation during a period of dependance on a woman. Your own life included, even if you want to reject the personhood of those around you.
Inasmuch as science can accurately ascertain "brain death" (debatable, most of the posters here would qualify as you know) there is a secondary consideration: do regular medical measures ensure their continued life? If yes, we are morally obligated to care for them. If they require permanent ventilation and exterior life support, it is indeed a moral grey area. But regardless, the equivocation of standards is not a reasonable one. A braindead adult will not naturally develop to a healthy one, a fetus will.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Brain death is like just death lol, their hearts may be beating but their minds are permanently gone, is not like being in coma
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
By that logic
newborns aren't a life
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
omg! Fetal brain activity starts after 12-14 weeks
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There's brain
activity in coma patients too lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
coma and brain death aren't the same thing
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Fair enough
they're usually used synonymously
Still disagree
with the premise though
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
You're back
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context