The other day @Intervention posted something along the lines of "I remember when the gays were accusing Fauci of killing them."
This was in the context of some r drama conservatards (intervention literally being from r/conservative, the most r-slurred sub on reddit) trying to claim Fauci somehow failed to respond to the HIV epidemic.
The problem being, of course, is it wasn't Fauci, the CDC, or the NIH that failed. It was the Republican party and Ronald Reagan. It's not even remotely shocking intervention is unaware of this because she's a poorly educated moron and perpetually wrong about everything, but still.
Intervention, after another rightoid gave me an award to prevent me from dunking him, responded with this:
STFU wacko. I was alive to remember it and it's easily searchable.
Indeed b-word, it is easily searchable, and had you done so you'd have found this:
during the 1970s; by 1979, health professionals began to recognise an epidemic.9 In June 1981, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published the first official US report on the new disease. Over the following months, AIDS took a swift and devastating toll on urban gay communities, with the hundreds of cases diagnosed that year representing only a tiny fraction of those already infected.10 However, the political climate deterred any proactive federal response. In keeping with his agenda of trimming federal government, the new president, Ronald Reagan, had cut budgets at the NIH and CDC. The social conservatives who helped elect him recoiled from a disease publicly associated with gay men—a strongly marginalised and stigmatised social group.11 Federal agency leaders expressed mounting frustrations over the next several years, as the administration blocked congressional appropriations for AIDS-related programmes and impeded the CDC’s attempts to mount prevention campaigns. Medical research at the NIH was relatively less affected by government recalcitrance, but for those already infected or at risk of contracting HIV little federal help was forthcoming. In 1983, activists succeeded in having AIDS designated a disability under Medicaid—but most AIDS patients died before receiving any benefits.
This is a common tactic you see Republicans engage in - they fail to respond to or block a government response to a serious issue, and then years later try to spin the failed response on other people - in this case Fauci.
In 30 years you can be sure the failed covid response will not be Donald Trump, but everyone else, just like somehow Fauci is to blame for Reagan failing to respond to HIV.
The lesson here, you dumb b-word, is that just because you lived through something doesn't mean you have any idea what you're talking about.
Anyone blaming Fauci for a failed HIV response is objectively fricking wrong and warping history.
R-slur #2.
Yeah, moron, not only do people act as projectiles inside the vehicle when unbelted, you can easily be flung out into traffic and cause more accidents:
https://clickorlando.com/traffic/2020/12/07/fatal-crash-closes-i-4-in-osceola-county/
There's way more here, but it isn't actually worth trying to argue with people claiming seatbelt laws are tyranny or that they only protect the individual.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
How will rightoids ever recover?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
nobody cares you pathetic cute twink imagine crying on the internet
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You commented twice here, that imply you do indeed care. When I don't care about things I don't respond to them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Unfortunately, I think xe won this round by default. You replied to xir comment, which implies you care about xir caring, which is lame.
It’s a tough situation. Because the point about not responding to things we don’t care about is the winning one. But in order to express it, you must break the very rule and outlook it espouses. A veritable conundrum, if you will. Such is the utility of the “read receipt” in text messaging.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
TARD FIGHT TARD FIGHT
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
idc in the way you think i do you r-slurred cute twink
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Do you think this brand of belligerent r-sluration is impactful?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I can’t believe he gets to say r-slur
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
my belligerence completely disrupted this degenerate shithole website. it was asked for too btw
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh nooo we've been disrupted, how can we possibly recover from this? We got too cocky, twinkbros
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
ill be talked about here for a long time
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Bro you're going to have to do better than this to be remembered here. I'm sorry but compared to your predecessors you're a garden variety moron.
You're more memorable than some, but your brand of r-sluration is too generic.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
im not here to be remembered just want everyone to know including you that youre a subhuman cute twink. just a larp btw
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Who?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
exactly. im a stranger and i still got more recognition here than you ever will
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
HIV needs to be cured already because its drama value peaked 30 years ago
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Other people being r-slurred and wrong too doesn't mean the rightoids are right.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm pretty sure they're protesting the elder Cuomo here, so you right. But there were also rightoid proposals to shut it all down, not sure how Fauci fit into all this, this was best I could find https://aep.lib.rochester.edu/node/49111. Apparently Kramer didn't like the sort of testing Fauci was doing
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I mean I'd believe this, but even this just seems some people mad at the failed government response and trying to blame Fauci and not the person directing it: The Reagan admin.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That letter is from 88 by a gay. Not sure of Fauci celebrity back then but I don't think they had reason to be mad at him beyond his actions. What does a proper government response even look like? Did anywhere get it right? Beyond policing of gay s*x I don't think there was much that could be done. He might have fricked up a preventable gay pandemic but with AIDs the worst thing I could find was he didn't talk about it until 1985 which is when lots of people started dying.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I linked something on it:
The government genuinely fricked up.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I can take a 9-inch dildo up my butt, because I'm an adult and I solve my own problems
Snapshots:
https://academic.oup.com/shm/article/33/3/1001/5265310:
https://clickorlando.com/traffic/2020/12/07/fatal-crash-closes-i-4-in-osceola-county/:
https://mercedsunstar.com/news/local/article254906857.html:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'm the one who gave you the award and your immediate response of seething copiously in my inbox made it absolutely worth it. This seethepost on top of it is a .
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Wow this effortpost sucks
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I didn't read all this so wow they will never recover or I'm sorry they said that to you
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Hmm wow crazy almost like it’s possible to blame multiple people at once, just as these find homos seem to be blaming both Fauci and Reagan
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Literally all they had to do was wear condoms to avoid the million other STDs people knew about for centuries and they still couldn’t do that lmfao.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It’s a part of the culture you wouldn’t get it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
R-slurs being wrong doesn't mean Fauci was to blame.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That’s not what @Intervention said, she just said 80’s gay people said that. And she was right. Ur thing abt “who’s really to blame” is irrelevant cope
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Nice try r-slur, the entire context of that convo was trying to pin it on Fauci.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yet she was right on the facts and u were wrong - appeal to “muh context” is cope
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
She was not right, and basic literacy should tell you why the context matters here.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
You see there was sneed, feed and seed. Chucks.. ahahahah suck and frick
Sneed, he sold feed and seed wich is totally normal, but chuck, he sold suck... and frick
Like intercourse and fellatio.
My oh my how did the simpsons get away with this one
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Honestly I want u/then here solely so you two can fight
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
That's a bit of a stretch and you know it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, it really isn't.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There are the default subs, the Bernie subs and the lgbt (groomer) subs. Arrr con tends to be slightly self aware. One of their jannies actually helped me set up a bait sub once that I never ended up executing.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
R conservative is many times worse than all of those subs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
How do you figure? Arr con is the other end of the reddit Horseshoe but they're not allowed to be too extreme or else the chadmins ban them while the leftoid subs get to run wild. Last I checked they avoided all the Q and antivax stuff and were mostly normal people that didn't like trains.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why are you even engaging with this r-slur?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I honestly like pizza.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Let me show you how I figure, this is the kind of shit you find r con before the jannies mass delete everything to cover up what the sub actually is:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Honestly the fact the jslurs delete it speaks to how the subreddit is better. Equivalent stuff on leftoid and default subs that would word for word change "blacks" to "Christians" just gets left up.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They fully endorse all of this, they just don't want reddit banning the sub. I've gotten in arguments with r con mods off site and they're even worse than what I linked.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is really the opposite of the experience I've had. We spoke to different mods I guess.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Why do you get into arguments with Reddit mods on other sites...? Just why??
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
You couldn't be more full of shit. It's coming out your ears.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
You're a 🐸?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Still better than srd
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Did you forget about arr atheism?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
(Witty comment)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
38K deaths a year in the U.S. due to traffic accidents and you pull two that don't even prove your point lmfaoooo
So there's no ambiguity whatsoever, let's quote what you originally said:
Except the people in your examples don't hurt other people... lol.
How mad do you have to be to spend that much effort only to prove you're an idiot.
PS: Disagreeing with you doesn't make someone a rightoid, idiot.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You can absolutely cause traffic accidents you 70 IQ community college drop-out.
You are a mongoloid.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So find an actual example of it then lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, because I don't feel like sorting through 500 law pages. Basic common sense should tell you being thrown into oncoming traffic can cause more accidents.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Then cite one lmao. You are so unbelievably stupid.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm not going to dig through 500 law blogs to prove to a mongoloid that basic common sense exists.
Now stop responding to me and go be a 70 IQ mongoloid somewhere else.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Thats because you cant find one, but you sure did try. Nice try moron.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No I didn't even try, I just know there's going to be 500 law blogs talking about it.
Either way, common sense exists no matter what. You are low IQ.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lol "common sense" is the saddest retreat I've seen from you. I suggest if you realize you're wrong you could pivot to some obscure Wikipedia article or giant tome no one will read.
I know you would never concede a point, but usually you do better than this.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm not going to prove to some r-slurred soy that the sky is blue.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Hard to dunk on them when no one's going to read it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Pizza you should post conservatives on twitter saying stupid shit and/or getting ratio-ed. I need help to make the site more balanced. I found a dumb Jack Prostatioa or whatever tweet but it never caught on
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I bet next you're gonna say helmet laws are for others on the road too lol 😆
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Neither of your links show an ejected person causing injury to other people.
When you ride in a vehicle without someone wearing a seatbelt you're assuming the risk that that person's body may bonk you in the head and hurt you in the event of a crash. It's the same risk you take when you ride with someone who's been drinking.
Seatbelt laws are tyrannical and should be abolished.
“Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety"
- Iowa_hawkeye
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If you can be thrown into traffic, you can absolutely cause further accidents, people will obviously try to avoid hitting you.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Doesn't seem to be the case though and the laws aren't written like that's the case, especially with around half the states not requiring adults to wear seatbelts in the back seat and in many states it not even being a primary traffic offense.
The laws are written for personal protection, not for the protection of others.
Stop using extremely rare events to justify tyrannical laws that's purpose isn't even to stop those extremely rare cases.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Anyone claiming seatbelt laws are tyranny literally deserves to be taken behind a shed and shot in the back of the head to prevent them from breeding.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Same could be said for the tyrants, the tree of liberty is thirsty.
If people want to be dipshits and not wear a seat belt, let them. Don't justify your need for control over others by bringing up things that rarely ever happen.
I decided to look and seat belt laws are a primary offense in more states than I thought. Them being a primary offense is a big problem, all it takes is a LEO to say I didn't see your seatbelt on to pull you over and that gives the state more opportunity to violate your rights and waste your time.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What is it with libertariantards and the misuse of that quote?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I used the quote correctly.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, you didn't.
The entire context of that quote was Jefferson writing a letter to the US military when they were violently crushing an uprising against the government.
In fact the people rising up against the government were doing so over taxes, and were hanging tax collectors from trees:
The actual quote being:
He was talking about killing people that were revolting against government authority.
Unless I misunderstood you and you were saying this in response to me saying you should die.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think you should read the entire letter Jefferson wrote along with getting it in context with the letter he was replying to. Your Google cliffnotes are off the mark.
Now answer the more important question, are you a 🐸?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
So find an example. Keep searching!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Whereas people will happily just plow into the wreckage of your vehicle?
Can't we just say that crashes on the road increase the likelihood of other crashes on the road, and get rid the easiest excuse for cops to profile and wrongly pull over Black people?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
And so should beveraged driving laws for people who can pass a beveraged driving test.
this account is sponsored by Raid Shadow Legends
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
100% this hawkeye. I ain't going to give up my loli collection or stop hanging around public schools, lest I succumb to tyrannical rule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
yes the laws exist to protect individuals from stupidity. That is worth doing
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context