The New Yorker article is called "Why So Many People Are Going "No Contact" with Their Parents" from August 30. It discusses the trend of millenial and Gen Z kids who completely estrnager themsleves from their parents for often unspecified or relatively minor issues. Being "toxic", or conservative, or not being 100% aligned with the current stance on gender. The author is very nuanced and interviews one young woman estraged from her family and also compares her to other online stories, while also reserving empathy for parents confused by this. /r/longreads is a sub for posting long non-fiction articles. It's not /r/raisedbynarccists or one of those shitty JUSTNO fanfiction subs so one would expect a rfairly balanced reaction to a complex issue, right? The sub's whole deal is digesting complexing information.
Nah. Comments are filled with people trauma dumping their ridiculous family conflcits for all to see. One commenter longposts about all their bullshit mommy issues, and describes the reason for their estrangement thusly:
Man, I still don't understand the reason why. Your wedding was dramatic and people wanted different things so you didn't talk to your mother for five years?
Another comment:
I don't really understand how you could write an article discussing a child separating from their parents without explaining that, no, the parents were not abusive in the way the majority of people consider to be 'abusive'.
Redditor's reading comprehension is zero. I don't see how one can read the article and think the author is calling anyone abusive. Where does it imply the parents don't love her? Even "Amy", the journ*list's interviewee, doesn't believe that. So much seethe.
Basically, the article goes into depth in gently challenging some of the gosoel beliefs of the 'no contact' / 'raised by narcissist' communities, including the fundamental belief that it's impossible for a parent to understand or make up for whatever grievance their child has given as the reason for their estrangement. What do redditors do? They simply post links to the books and articles that the author has clearly read and lightly refuted.
etc
The longer your scroll in the comments the more filled with sneed and less intelligent they get.
Anyway, here is a great example of the orthodoxy of reddit being challenged and the resulting cope and seethe. Enjoy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What in the ever-loving frick is this?
To paraphrase, "Giving an opinion is ok if the opinion does not refute a woman's experience"
LMAO.
Somehow I think this guy isn't going to go to a conservative subreddit and write "Giving an opinion is ok if the opinion does not refute a conservative's experience".
Let's look at some of this person's other posts. Hmm, let's see...
Well, this is not surprising.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What a strag
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Lmao "voter bounty hunters" is a hilarious idea.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I would strongly support this, but only if the voting bounty hunters are using voter registration info to murder my political enemies.
That's what everyone who suggests this system intends to use it for in the long run.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
"But... but... how did the first election after the mandatory voting bill was passed and the bounty hunters rounded up people and made them vote, how did that election go to the opposition party by 99%? There must be something wrong! Why didn't people vote the way I want them to vote, for my party, which forced them to go out and vote even if they didn't want to?"
Guy is either the world's biggest idiot or the world's greatest troll, not sure which.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Turnout doesn't even help Democrats right now
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
What the frick does this have to do with anything r-slur
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
i think you meant to post this on the /r/TwoX imposter thread
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's not even hard to get people to vote though. Just make it easy to do, then collect an extra 100$ in taxes every year and say that it'll be given back with your tax return if you cast a vote. Extremists are just really weird and I think they should all be put in a gulag
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context