Ricardo Nunes, the most generic and bland video game NPC politican, has won the SP election, against Guilherme Boulos, the champagne socialist Lula ripoff, and Pablo Marçal, the full-blown Andrew Tate-esque dating coach griftGOD, every single candidate is a soulless ghoul, one the least worse than the other.
This was also a great victory for the !grillers, because blank and abstinence votes were massive (voting is obligatory by law), probably the biggest in Brapzilian history, a lot of people are getting tired of the "vote for the least worst candidate" schtick for the past 20 years, even the rightoid sub /r/brasilivre fricking hates Nunes, "but at least he is not a commie" is the only thing they will be repeating til the heat death of the sun
Anyway, the leftoid proletarian warrior of the working class won only in the richest districts of the city
perhaps the gradual worsening of social conditions is the only way forward in the 21st century.
In the meantime, all we can do is organize ourselves and do what we can.
/u/Capivaraazzul (BlueCapybara )
No mentions of the leftoid candidate being a total r-slur who sang a gender-neutral non-binary version of the national anthem, him being a literal rich butthole from a family of doctors that has zero similarities and familiarity with working class voters, only appealing to social media-addicted middle-upper class university tards that redditors are, and ignoring the failure after failure of leftoid latinx-american governments to do anything other than enrich themselves, frick the economy, cater to dictatorial shitholes, and censor internet grandpas talking shit on twitter
The rest of the comments are a variation of "people who live in SΓ£o Paulo are r-slurs" (:agreefast:)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
where is the lie? Even Mao said famine was good because it made people revolutionary. We need more chaos and suffering before revolution happens, lets be honest.
But yeah communism will win when it stops being led by nerds, Mao also talked about this.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
@BrasilIguana agree but not because of some revolution @BrasilIguana is just anti humanity at this point
Long live the CCP
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!edgelords
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
idk why I am in the edgelords ping group and I get sent this stupid shit.
I dont even want to know what the frick is going on.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Very true long live the CCP
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I dont hate humanity I will put it how robespierre put it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm sure if the revolution happens you'll end up better off than him.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Robespierre earned martyrdom and won
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Dude communism will never win and it will never be a serious thing ever again
@Transgender_spez
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Communism will win
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It'll win MY BOOT IN ITS BUTT
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
!chads !commies
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
!commies, tried that. Turns out killing everyone who's ever read a book is not an effective long term strategy. !anticommunists, who could've guessed?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
True Khmerrougism has never been tried the leaders forgot to kill themselves after all
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Stalin did it and Mao too
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Communist countries are only ever ruled by nerds who wanted to be a tyrant, or a thug with no moral qualms about doing anything to anybody.
The "Communism will work when <insert group="" my="" preferred=""> are in charge" is pure delusion.</insert>
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
except everytime communists actually tried to do revolution they won
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
not Marxist-leninist
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Mao and Stalin and XiJiping are real socialism
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Communism is the good side, which wins in the end
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Bro literally admits his ideology is not good enough to overtake capitalism without sabotaging it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Communists say Capitalism was good, now its outdated and will collapse and be replaced by communism
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Marx said this but then Capitalism just kept making everyone richer Remember, he never predicted the middle class, the single thing that dismantled any chances of his ideology rising in a the type of industrialized nation he said it should.
If you have to sabotage capitalism for your ideology to replace it....
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Then we will do that, we have done it before.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I know
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
ez
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I read a history of the Holocaust and the author said the same thing, the holocaust could only have happened in a state of anarchy. It was started and perfected in between the spaces between civilization, mostly in poland between germany and russia, where people were just trying to survive and all civil power was in ruins. Seeking your political fortune in that environment is probably a going to backfire spectacularly.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The Holocaust was a product of war and ideology, not anarchy. People were trying to survive in occupied Poland, but not because of state collapse, rather because the invader was trying to starve them on purpose by restricting caloric intake by poles. The anarchy thing would rather fit the Rwandan genocide or the pogroms in the Russian Empire but not a totalitarian state deliberately committing mass killings because of ideological reasons.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The point was the circumstances of destroying civil order creates environments of anarchy (usually outside the main cities) which spawns the worst sort of human misery which feeds back into the parent. It wasn't about the causes that makes people want to destroy everything in the first place and radically try dumb shit.
If you read the history leading up to the white army fighting the reds in 1910 Russia it was the same story. It was all cool revolution in the cities but in the rural areas and Ukraine it was just pure brutal experiments in killing off landowners and anyone vaguely successful by semi organized mobs/militias. Not surprising the crazy violent dudes beat out the intellectual ideologues.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
That's the debate between functionalism and intentionalism in Holocaust studies.
@PatriceOneal is referring to the functionalists interpretation that the Holocaust was started from the bottom up before being sanctioned by the high command while you're referring to the intentionalist interpretation that the Holocaust was started from the top down.
Both agree that the Holocaust was the inevitable conclusion to Nazi ideology and sanctioned by Hitler though differ in how that point was reached.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No. Even the functionalist interpretation was due to ideology, not mere anarchy. And even the "bottom-up" einsetzgruppen was sanctioned by the big bosses, functionalism merely states that the final solution was arrived after a period of constant radicalization which is true, but it was still the natural end of the national-socialist ideology
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I assumed anarchy was referring the inherent anarchy of war and operational freedom in the field. Obviously it was ideological.
The Hitler State by Martin Broszat says this on page 126
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Well, on that regard I agree. The Holocaust and WW2 in Europe were intertwined
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
It will backfire for most who attempt it, but a select few will win most likely, at the expense of their enemies.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The non-nerd version of communism is fascism or nationalism. They accept the critique of a hands-off state, but they aren't resentful enough to want to upend all tradition and beauty, and completely rewrite the world because they hate their parents.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So you saying Stalin and Mao were nerds? cope
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
You can't even speak to 50% of the human race, how do you expect to survive the collapse of Western civilization
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't care if I survive or not really, as long as my team wins
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context