Unable to load image

[๐Ÿค“๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜] Freedom of speech โ‰  freedom from consequences

https://old.reddit.com/r/saltierthankrait/comments/1hmyzy0/freedom_of_speech_freedom_from_consequences/

								

								

Most Based Comments

Basedness: ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Freedom of speech exactly does mean freedom from consequences for this speech, the opposite is a pretty dumb statement. By this logic, you can say that incarcerating people for criticizing a politician is in fact a freedom of speech, just not from consequencesRecent ban of gaming memes was for being unmoderated, and the following for a new sub was for recreating the banned sub, it wasn't ever banned for hate or anything of the sorts (19)

1) the freedom of my arm is limited by your personal space, while I'm free to move it if I move it to you I am no longer free to do so since it becomes your problem. The creation of a hatred echochamber radicalizes people towards acts of hate to the minorities they ridicule.2) being banned for being 'unmoderated' is sometimes used by Reddit to ban subs without letting slip the actual reason. Gamingmemes was a rather large sub so I imagine Reddit doesn't want to actually state that it was due to the hate speech. You are correct about the second one tho. (-12)

Basedness: ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

when a private entity behaves or seeks to behave as the public square they should be restricted by the same rules of enforcement and freedoms of the public square. (2)

R/gamingmemes was not attempting to be the public square (-1)

Basedness: ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

And then a new sub was made that had moderation and that was deleted too for reasons unspecified. (8)

"Reasons unspecified"Why lie?The reason was ban evasion. (-1)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก

Freedom of speech exactly does mean freedom from consequences for this speech, the opposite is a pretty dumb statement. By this logic, you can say that incarcerating people for criticizing a politician is in fact a freedom of speech, just not from consequencesRecent ban of gaming memes was for being unmoderated, and the following for a new sub was for recreating the banned sub, it wasn't ever banned for hate or anything of the sorts (19)

1) the freedom of my arm is limited by your personal space, while I'm free to move it if I move it to you I am no longer free to do so since it becomes your problem. The creation of a hatred echochamber radicalizes people towards acts of hate to the minorities they ridicule.2) being banned for being 'unmoderated' is sometimes used by Reddit to ban subs without letting slip the actual reason. Gamingmemes was a rather large sub so I imagine Reddit doesn't want to actually state that it was due to the hate speech. You are correct about the second one tho. (-12)

Angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก

Here, I also screenshotted it.https://www.reddit.com/r/TheOdysseyHadAPurpose/s/yiVxptZPKu (1)

Are you illiterate? I'm saying that it's a waste of time to call people names on social media just because they have a differing opinion.This is totally non related to calling your trash mates names or trash talking your enemies in a game.Who tf would go out of his way to go to a comment on the internet and start wasting your time to insult somebody. I'm trapped in the game either way, I can't change my mates, there's nothing left besides clutching up and insulting them.Also, I'm saying it's stupid to insult people. Which is true for this as well, it shouldn't be banned though.Edit: Fixed two typos. (1)

Angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก

"Reasons unspecified"Why lie?The reason was ban evasion. (-1)

old sub was deleted for "lack of moderation", new sub had moderation but was deleted anyways, what about this is ban evasion excactly? stop being so dishonest and bad faith (4)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/erieus_wolf

Score: ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Number of comments: 4

Average angriness: ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Maximum angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ”˜

Minimum angriness: ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining! :marseyminer:

:marppy: autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents. :marseycapitalistmanlet: Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion :marseyjamming:

36
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Redditors are mentally incapable of seeing freedom of speech as both an innate right granted to muricans and a value people hold.

This makes it impossible to dicuss the concept with them at all :doomerchud:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It really is crazy how they think the first amendment of the US constitution is literally synonymous with the very concept of freedom of expression, and not simply one implementation of it written into law that covers one part of it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>freedom to from cruel and unsual punishment is just a right granted in the US constitution, if you dont like that ur Amazon distribution manager wants to hook a car battery up to your testicles until you admit you clocked-out early last shift, then get a different job sweaty :marseynails:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They understand it perfectly well, it's just not convenient at the moment so they default to arguing about the letter of the law. Progs were all about free speech as a humanist value right up until they got a taste of cultural hegemony.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You can always count on redditors (derogatory) to jump into any discussion of morals with "well :marseyakshually: the law says XYZ and the law is the final word on morality" right after sneeding about :marseykyle: and retweeting #ACAB

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.