https://old.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/1i0tchg/marianne_bachmeier_avenging_her_7_yr_old_daughter/

Most Based Comments

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔘🔘🔘

Luigi Mangione treatment. (610)

Frick off with that (-86)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔘🔘🔘

I mean it seems like the best move for self preservation (214)

Or they knew what was up and allowed it? (57)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔘🔘🔘

Luigi Mangione treatment. (610)

Because prisoners are communist inspired terminally online anti capitalists. (-50)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

I wonder how you arrived at this conclusion. Both are murderers, what's the basis for differentiating one as good and one as evil?She killed to avenge her daughter preyed upon by a monster, he killed to avenge millions preyed upon by the American healthcare monster. I don't think the understandably more turbulent emotions of the familial connection makes her a "good" person. (1)

The basis for differentiating a murderer as good or evil is who they killed. Is George Washington evil? He killed red coats, soldiers of a tyrannical government, but he still killed. Is Teddy Roosevelt evil? He killed people in his time as a Rough Rider, protecting American Freedom, but he still killed people. What makes Her or Luigi any different? They killed people, but bettered the world for it. (1)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Molesting means sexual assault, so yes, r*pe. I wish more cases were solved with the victim getting justice. None of those monsters should be allowed to live, even in jail. (313)

Not to step on toes but as someone who suffered childhood sexual abuse, I and many others consider "molesting" and "child r*pe" to refer to different acts. Molesting means to touch in a sexual manner, or engage in forced oral s*x whereas child r*pe is genital on genital penetration. (4)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

It's only a law because someone says it is. Life is a lot better when you quit bootlicking completely arbitrary rules in your day to day life.Of course, there needs to be rules and regulations with almost everything or people believe there would be chaos- but advocating for a normal mother who was just avenging their daughter- that's straight bootlicking miserable behavior. I'm sorry that your opinion sickens me so much, but really dude?So let's say the alternative (I know nothing about this case btw) if the suspect DIDNT murder but did everything else. The guy gets out of prison relatively quickly (because that's how our justice system works), what if they repeat the same acts a dozen more times and affect a dozen more lives. But people like you want to defend them, why? A lot of these people are sick in the head and will reoffend. And I just can't fathom hoping the mother got a life sentence. (-2)

Imagine the opposite. The dude on trial didn't do it and a woman kills him and then gets off on it. Not only is his murderer given freedom but he never gets the chance to prove his freedom.THIS is the problem with vigilante justice. Thousands of cases in America see innocent people thrown into prison for a plethora of reasons. Like seriously this week Ronnie Long, who had served 44 years in prison for a r*pe he didn't commit, was freed once evidence exonerated him. If his supposed victim's parent had killed him in court he'd never have been able to set the record straight.So, as respectfully as I can say, shut the frick up about bootlicking.P.S: My "hope" for her having a life sentence is more about vigilante justice not being rewarded. Because, if you give people a pass for vigilante justice... you just get more and more of that shit. If proper legal channels get it wrong so fricking often, how often do you think vigilante justice gets it wrong?A good example of this type of bullshit... (1)