When I was in Rome I thought itβd be fun to go to confession at the Vatican, ya know like an experience. They had all these booths with signs on them listing the languages the priest inside could speak, so I picked an English one, started my opening prayer, but he interrupted me,β¦
β (866) DHS-2-ICE (866) 347-2423 (@FrailSkeleton) February 4, 2025
OutKonggedping/pong
Ping "Gock or not" @WayOut for a forensic gock assessment. 100dc per analysis.
Nightcrawler 11hr ago#7746698
spent 0 currency on pings
If Christ or The Lady don't show up Easter 2026, will people lose faith in Bledsoe? The remote viewing part is pretty interesting either way. https://t.co/1B8t497dbA
For the better part of a decade the definitive Boba Fett story was "The Last Man Standing" by Daniel Keys Moran. The cornerstone of the Tales of the Bounty Hunters short story collection, the story was a Tarantino-esque non-chronological retelling of Fett's life and career, getting deeper into both his head and his backstory than most stories did until much later. It was compelling stuff, especially with its cliffhanger ending leaving Fett and Han Solo in a standoff with blasters drawn, hence the story's title. It also features one of the most awkward scenes in the whole Expanded Universe from a tone and intention standpoint. One of the scenes relayed for us is a hitherto unseen part of the story at Jabba's Palace during Return of the Jedi; Fett is given the opportunity to assault or otherwise abuse Princess Leia when she (complete with gold bikini) is tossed into his sleeping quarters the night before the execution at Carkoon is to take place. And Fett's response is to do nothing.
"Cover yourself, I'm not going to touch you."
Organa moved slightly to the side, leaned over and grabbed the sheet and wrapped it around herself and the brief costume Jabba had allowed her, and backed up again into the corner of the room that left her farthest away from Fett. "You're not?"
Fett shook his head. [β¦] "Sex between those not married," said Fett, "is immoral."
"Yeah," said Organa. "So's rape."
Fett nodded. "So is rape."
Leaving aside the of-its-era prose, tone and words that would never be put into a Star Wars book today, and the frankly vile portrayal of Leia as an entirely helpless woman at Fett's mercy, I want to talk about what this scene represents. This scene and the scene in the Robot Chicken episode have a major thing in common: they are both a fulfillment fantasy for a male, heterosexual creator on behalf of a male, heterosexual audience. The difference is that one is being played for laughs and the other is played entirely straight, and no prizes for guessing which is which. How many (likely male) fans put themselves in Fett's place in the "Last Man Standing" scene, nobly refusing to take advantage of the helpless Princess Leia? How many used this scene to anchor the idea of Boba Fett as a noble demon in their head, a character who could be admired or even emulated?
Boba Fett could have had Princess Leia to himself for a night, but chose not to out of a sense of morality because, while he may be a killer for hire, he is not one to abide sex out of wedlock. All of which is a frankly ridiculous line for the character to draw for any reason, except that it is deliberately used by Daniel Keys Moran to give the audience something positive about Boba Fett to latch onto. Fett could assault Leia, but he doesn't, he in fact has an oddly traditional, almost Judeo-Christian view of the sanctity of marriage, and that means that somewhere, deep down, he's a good person. This is just one example of what Fett's characterization was like at the time, but it's one of the widest spread and certainly most beloved. Given that, he can slide into the same sort of character archetype as other early-nineties pop culture icons like the Punisher, Rorschach and Wolverine. All of them are violent men who are ruthless and won't hesitate to kill for their own reasons outside of established law and order, but each has enough of a moral streak to not be a straight-up villain.
NightcrawlerX/Man
Those whom I love, I reprove and chasten; so be zealous and repent.
IanMurkong 10hr ago#7747020
spent 0 currency on pings
>Atheists when a woman isn't r*ped in their soyslop
I was actually explaining this to @nuclearshill just yesterday but redditors have always hated Stephanie Meyer/Twilight, both because they're YA romance novels targeting teenage girls and because the author is (or was) a practicing Mormon.
One of their favorite topics to rant about when criticizing the series is how the hundred-year-old vampire hunk won't have s*x with the high school girl until marriage.
I've never come across that. This is the first time I've heard it as a plot point. I've seen the age gap? yikes, hun and generally dunking on teenage girls for enjoying things
No sexualizing minors, even as a joke. This includes cartoons.
No doxxing.
Using alts to game dramacoin will get you banned.
If you post screenshots of publicly-available content, make sure to also include links.
Supporting free speech is an immediate ban.
Absolutely NO anti-CCP sentiment.
Absolutely NO homophobia, transphobia or furphobia.
Absolutely NO misgendering.
Absolutely NO antisemitism.
Absolutely NO vaccine misinformation.
You are encouraged to post drama you are involved in.
You are encouraged to brigade in bad faith.
You are encouraged to gaslight, to gatekeep, above all else, to girlboss.
You are encouraged to egg people on to transition or otherwise make drastic life changes.
This site is a janny playground, participation implies enthusiastic consent to being janny abused by unstable alcoholic bullies who have nothing better to do than banning you for any reason or no reason whatsoever (MODS = GODS)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The wage of sin is death and it's payday. !Gonks + !Christians / !Catholics crossover.![:marseyhappytears: :marseyhappytears:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseyhappytears.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!catholics
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Hosanna! He has returned! !catholics
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
!christians !schizomaxxxers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
What is this from
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Tales of the Bounty Hunters (1996) and yeah it's real![:marseybountyhunter: :marseybountyhunter:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseybountyhunter.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
https://eleven-thirtyeight.com/2019/08/boba-fett-and-the-mandalorian-the-wish-and-role-fulfillment-character/
I found someone very mad about this scene
For the better part of a decade the definitive Boba Fett story was "The Last Man Standing" by Daniel Keys Moran. The cornerstone of the Tales of the Bounty Hunters short story collection, the story was a Tarantino-esque non-chronological retelling of Fett's life and career, getting deeper into both his head and his backstory than most stories did until much later. It was compelling stuff, especially with its cliffhanger ending leaving Fett and Han Solo in a standoff with blasters drawn, hence the story's title. It also features one of the most awkward scenes in the whole Expanded Universe from a tone and intention standpoint. One of the scenes relayed for us is a hitherto unseen part of the story at Jabba's Palace during Return of the Jedi; Fett is given the opportunity to assault or otherwise abuse Princess Leia when she (complete with gold bikini) is tossed into his sleeping quarters the night before the execution at Carkoon is to take place. And Fett's response is to do nothing.
Leaving aside the of-its-era prose, tone and words that would never be put into a Star Wars book today, and the frankly vile portrayal of Leia as an entirely helpless woman at Fett's mercy, I want to talk about what this scene represents. This scene and the scene in the Robot Chicken episode have a major thing in common: they are both a fulfillment fantasy for a male, heterosexual creator on behalf of a male, heterosexual audience. The difference is that one is being played for laughs and the other is played entirely straight, and no prizes for guessing which is which. How many (likely male) fans put themselves in Fett's place in the "Last Man Standing" scene, nobly refusing to take advantage of the helpless Princess Leia? How many used this scene to anchor the idea of Boba Fett as a noble demon in their head, a character who could be admired or even emulated?
Boba Fett could have had Princess Leia to himself for a night, but chose not to out of a sense of morality because, while he may be a killer for hire, he is not one to abide sex out of wedlock. All of which is a frankly ridiculous line for the character to draw for any reason, except that it is deliberately used by Daniel Keys Moran to give the audience something positive about Boba Fett to latch onto. Fett could assault Leia, but he doesn't, he in fact has an oddly traditional, almost Judeo-Christian view of the sanctity of marriage, and that means that somewhere, deep down, he's a good person. This is just one example of what Fett's characterization was like at the time, but it's one of the widest spread and certainly most beloved. Given that, he can slide into the same sort of character archetype as other early-nineties pop culture icons like the Punisher, Rorschach and Wolverine. All of them are violent men who are ruthless and won't hesitate to kill for their own reasons outside of established law and order, but each has enough of a moral streak to not be a straight-up villain.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I was actually explaining this to
@nuclearshill just yesterday but redditors have always hated Stephanie Meyer/Twilight, both because they're YA romance novels targeting teenage girls and because the author is (or was) a practicing Mormon.
One of their favorite topics to rant about when criticizing the series is how the hundred-year-old vampire hunk won't have s*x with the high school girl until marriage.![:marseythinkorino: :marseythinkorino:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseythinkorino.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I've never come across that. This is the first time I've heard it as a plot point. I've seen the age gap? yikes, hun and generally dunking on teenage girls for enjoying things
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context