Reported by:

Have chuds really always hated USAID so much? :marseyhmm:

[I have to make this edit because I overestimated you tards. ENGLISH MOTHERLOVERS. Do you speak it? This post is not about foreign aid in general, whether USAID is corrupt (probably is :marseyshrug:), etc. It is about chuds' attitude to the specific institution USAID over time.]

Above is the google searches for "usaid" over the last 5 years, so it goes all the way back to Trump's first term.

Here's the last month. Notice it has nothing to do with Trump's inauguration. It just suddenly fires up one day when the NPCs got their firmware update.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1739064633T79CEI3u4Lgkcw.webp

:#npcmaga:

I've seen chuds all over this place acting like they always knew USAID is corrupt and this has been common knowledge throughout society for a long time.

Here's a good example from @finbarfin: USAID, one of the more infamous money laundering arms of our sprawling government

Infamous? Like Charles Manson? Benedict Arnold? Idi Amin? That Borgia chick who poisoned people? I've never in my life heard someone describe a person as "infamous" because they just became hated by a fraction of the population in the last week.

But Redactor, we've always hated USAID! We've been railing against their corruption for so long.

This site's users are neurodivergent, highly political, mostly right-wing so surely it has come up. Well, let's look at the data. (I know that's what the DOGE boys would do.) It was mentioned in 58 posts, of which 7 are from more than a month ago. It was mentioned in 134 comments, 13 from more than a month ago. Most of these just mention it in passing. Quite a few are negative, but not in the way our current chud program says. Most of these are attacking the politicians who ordered USAID to do something, third world people for stealing, or pointing out the actually true fact that it's largely a corporate welfare program for farmers. I'm not finding anything about corruption in the agency itself.

Did anyone post any evidence that they actually gave a shit about the internal workings of USAID back then? There was one person. Just one person. Can you guess who it was? I'll give you some time to think this over.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1739064633n-0JJo-pi2Y44g.webp

It was me! Little old Redactor. Not only did I care, I cared enough to read the entire fricking section of Project 2025 about it.

:#marseylaugh: :#marseyletsgo: :#marseylaugh:

And what was my opinion of it? It must be some woke soy libtard response. I probably cried on the shoulders of another guy in my polycule. You know me, the left-wing extremist.

I skimmed through Intelligence and USAID. It actually wasn't too scary. Most of it was just boilerplate "we should do things more efficiently" bullshit that could just as easily come from the Democrats. Their only new ideas were funneling aid money to missionaries in Africa and using aid to hurt Iran somehow.

Why did I choose those two sections? Why not health care, education, finance, other more important stuff? Because this was what I felt I was most qualified to evaluate.

I am the only one of you r-slurs who actually knew anything about your issue du jour before now. I even knew what was supposed to be Daddy's game plan for it. You can't deny it. I am the King of Chuds. It's time for you to crown me.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1739064634mIJVOIGScPO95w.webp

104
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Funny how everyone always knew our tax dollars were laundered for shit and never really knew how or where until now and we hate it, now that we know we get r-slurs like Redactor go UHM GOLLY GEE DID YOU ALWAYS HATE THE USAID? IM VERY INTELLIGENT :marseybrainlet:

!chuds Lets use this thread to discuss if rdrama shitlibs are actually r-slurred or le unironic bad faith posting as a coping mechanism for losing the popular vote?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So you spent years hating foreign aid and you never even bothered to learn what agency it goes through? And now that you have, you assume they're the the problem? :marseyfacepalm:

You're as r-slurred as the kids blocking streets in England to stop global warming. You obviously don't really give a shit about these issues, you just want call someone a "libtard" because maybe then Rush Limbaugh will take you as a catamite.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Never mentioned foreign aid, not even sure why that's your biggest hang up thinking that somehow defeats my point.

You're a giga r-slur defending federal money laundering

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

what is money laundering though? :marseysad:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You forgot to switch accounts

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

did I? I don't understand :marseysad:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Never mentioned foreign aid

Oh God, this is about "money laundering"? Jesus Fricking Christ. This is like trying to explain to the dog why you don't like her pooping in the dining room.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Can you stop pooping in the dining room then?

You know they make depends for old r-slurred people now. Maybe you can get USAID to pay for them for you since you're their lapdog

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Do you need to specifically know the names of every pharma executive and subsidiary to think that American healthcare has problems?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No. That's my point. :marseyfacepalm: If you brought out two cases of pharma executives doing something bad, I would have no idea if they all are like that or these are the only ones. This is why we have a government to regulate this stuff and journos (at least in the old days) watching over them and holding them to account.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Now playing: Busted Bayou (Tropical Freeze).mp3

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.