https://old.reddit.com/r/Marriage/comments/1im5fbn/can_you_marry_someone_with_different_beliefs/
The answer is no. Unless you want a divorce or to be miserable. There are small differences that are fine but you're talking about major values and that's a big no no.
You can disagree on the best NFL team (Go Birds π¦ ) but for fundamental things, you must be on the same page or, as you mentioned, there will be lots of fights and resentment in the future.
You can disagree on stuff like sports teams, restaurants, vacation locations. As soon as your disagreements reach "Human rights", then you're in a major issue. You will be with someone who believes some people are destined and deserve eternal punishment for the love they show being different. Take that how you will
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Being a wingcuck must be so difficult because the state of your marriage is determined solely by how strong your stance is on the syrian civil war or the uyghurs instead of things like "should we encourage our kid to do sports"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's like how libs say "not being into politics is being privileged". It's actually quite the opposite.
If you have enough free time in the day not working or looking after dependants that you can devote to being an obnoxious wingcuck, you are more likely to be the privileged one.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm also pretty sure there are apolitical blacks, homos, and womxn. All trains are obsessed with politics though, I'll give them that.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I want a geopolitical analyst azn waifu to talk about the latest updates on the anti-Taliban Republican insurgency in the Panjshir Valley and the M23-Rwandan Offensive in North Kivu while I creampie her with my BWC
!historychads !neolibs !neurodivergents !followers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Hate to break it you r-slurred wigger kang, but you're looking for a man
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wrong! Now take the bathroom HRT, put on the wig and talk dirty about Syrian HTS border incursions with the Hezbollah, b-word. Also tell my all about [redacted]
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I'd genuinely have a lot of respect for these people if they gave up their families and comfy first-world life out of principles and instead dedicated their lives to charity by helping these people they care so much about, like the missionaries of old.
But they never do. The extent of sympathy that these people have for malnourished african children is enough to make a #abolishcolonialism tweet, but nothing more. It's crazy how any passion or concern for a social issue can now be reduced to 'raising awareness'. Actual involvement is no longer necessary
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You can't even tell them "buy less stuff built in sweatshops" without them posting that comic at you and justifying monthly 12lb boxes of shein clothing
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Telling a redditor to stop consuming from slave labor sweatshops is one of the quickest ways to piss them off for some reason. Same thing as telling them to do 30 minutes of exercise or literally anything in their self interest
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Uh oh, guess you're unaware that some r-slur made a comic where a chud in a well is making a completely different argument
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I have no morals, sure, but at least I'm not running around pretending to
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Wingcuckery is just what the sort of people who need religion filled that big religion-shaped hole in society with.
Free will takes work and a large percentage of the population simply don't want it enough, no matter how many products they buy (see: an arts degree) to convince themselves otherwise.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You can be a wingcuck and have free will but most of the time they're just basing their entire lives around armchair politics.
Wingcuck libs will ignore any and all actions you have performed and focus solely on how much you agree with them verbally to judge your worth as a person. They'll equate the slightest deviation or wavering loyalty in their policies to "hate" or antagonism.
You could volunteer at a soup kitchen on the weekends but if you dare to say verbally you don't like strung out addicts shambling around your bus stop, god help you.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
In theory yes, but I'd argue the labels right wing, left wing, or heck, even centrist, simply have too much baggage, and too little in the way of consistent foundational beliefs, for me to take seriously anyone who unironically applies these labels to themselves.
I mean, name one consistent principle that either the left or the right has largely stayed firm on over the past couple of decades?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
IME religious orgs did a lot of real work and the political orgs were usually a front for a social club.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context