Unable to load image

:quote: Hackers :quote: demonstrate how clueless :marseyclueless: they are when it comes to math :marseymath:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42992505

Would subtraction also approximate division?

Yes.

Would negation also approximate the reciprocal?

:marseyretardcha#dtyping:

I've always hated that it's called an "inverse". It's not an inverse. The inverse of square root is square. If they had called it "reciprocal", it would have been clear to me what it does, but "inverse" confused the heck out of me when I first saw it.

It's confusing for non-mathematicians, but (and you may know that) it is not incorrect. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_element "In mathematics, the concept of an inverse element generalises the concepts of opposite (βˆ’x) and reciprocal (1/x) of numbers."

:soyjakdancing2talking: Shoulda just called it fast :bbbr: :to: :bbbr: mapping()

"inverse" has a very specific meaning: inverse(x) * x = 1, x^2 * x != 1 for any x other than 1. So no, x^2 is not the inverse of sqrt(x)

:brainletpit#:

The inverse is about the negative power right? Square root is the 0.5

:marseyconfused2:

!mathematics

44
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The inverse is about the negative power right? Square root is the 0.5

was he actually trying to say "square root is the 0.5 exponent," i.e. the inverse of x^2=y is y^(0.5)=x

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The comment chain is about whether fastInverseSqrt(x) = 1/sqrt(x) = x^(-0.5) should be called fastReciprocalSqrt(x).

With his logic, fastInverseSqrt could just as well mean -x^0.5

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

just throw an i in there or something

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.