From the makers of New Vegas, comes this.
We really need to stop making games that look so insanely repulsive too pic.twitter.com/v4Q0THE8XI
β Party Monster Stoatley (@MatthewTheStoat) February 13, 2025
Fricking r-slurs. They made a green vitiligo butch lesbian with broccoli zoomer hair.
You wonβt believe what score IGN gave avowed. π
β Grummz (@Grummz) February 13, 2025
Go on, guess⦠pic.twitter.com/EIdwhcxgAA
Avowed Art Director. pic.twitter.com/bq257IdU3p
β LearningTheLaw (@Mangalawyer) February 13, 2025
Jason Schreier weighs in continuing his historic streak of always being on the wrong side of history
Jason Schreier's opinion on Avowed. pic.twitter.com/t8D6Sanmkr
β Pirat_Nation π΄ (@Pirat_Nation) February 13, 2025
Anyways I'm hopping back into KCD2
Bonus for my halo fans: the concord devs are joinng the halo team
Three developers from Firewalk Studios (Concord) have joined Halo Studios:
β Rebs Gaming (@Mr_Rebs_) February 12, 2025
β’Jason Shifter: Senior Matchmaking and Systems Designer (Led Concordβs multiplayer team and gameplay design for Apex Legends Mobile)
β’Travis Treadway: Senior VFX artist (Created VFX for Concord andβ¦ pic.twitter.com/NEz2mK68C3
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Am I out of touch or does the combat from this game look like dogshit for the current year? Look at some gameplay, this looks at least like a game from 10 years ago but with slightly better graphics.
Now compare that to a game that came out in 2013
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Its the genre difference I think. To me, combat looks fine, almost fun, but only because it has the classic everquest feel to it, so it might just be nostalgia
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's why I think I might just be missing something or don't have the nostalgia for games like this. I haven't really seen anyway talk about how the combat is bad. I've never played Everquest or Pillars of Eternity. I play turn based RPGs and ARPGs. and I like fantasy as a setting, but this game just looks bad to me. I just don't understand paying $70 for the game equivalent of a 14 years late copy of Skyrim.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah the game is definitely ugly art wise, and most certainly a questionable $70 purchase. I'd pay $30 - $40 for it though
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I don't think there's been much evolution in gaming since 2013.
But yeah this looks slow and dated.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I like some of the concept art
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Don't let other people's opinions dissuade you about things you like.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Looks extremely by-the-numbers. It doesn't try to have interesting movement, or powers, or combo mechanic, nothing to differentiate itself.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
From what I have seen it does look pretty bad. Really floaty and low impact melee combat with health sponge enemies that take twenty swings each to kill. The magic gameplay looks better I guess but only relatively so.
Honestly I thought it made Veilguard's combat look good in comparison lol.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
BG3 uses dice.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The better the combat looks, the more likely it's one of all of the following:
assasin creed-like 'push button to do [COOL THING]'
zero difficulty
zero depth
makes you fall asleep
The games that have good combat like archeage or wow look like a clown fiesta on a video, but are actually great when played
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context