oh my fucking god she thinks that Nietzsche's description of master-slave morality was him commenting on real life slavery??? and asks where his source is for that being how slavery worked??? https://t.co/ruDhaUyHYR
— Ω (@INXLiNGs) February 15, 2025
2018 breadtuber posts video about BAPist jerk-off material. Gets r*ped on xitter
https://x.com/inxlings/status/1890806713004982514
- 21
- 26
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh yeah btw USAID unironcially funded xhem
https://t.co/G1ravu3NIQ
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Looks like the UK equivalent, but yes, the biggest skinwalker
is essentially a government psyop.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Philosophy
strikes again
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I always go back to this tranniger saying he can't afford some shitty bonglish apartment when he's probably making over 250k a year from Patreon alone.
It's not that it was a point crucial for the video, which just makes you wonder, why even make it?Yes I know why, narcissistic
that wants to make his audience think he's a poor totally just like them
Nothing that comes out of this creature's mouth is true or honest from heart.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He'd be able to afford it if he was Indian
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
He's a sociopath. Also up there with Dylan Mulvaney for being the best-known
who did it for the career boost.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Despite
all the seethe
I've yet to see what Dylan Mulvaney
did to earn the massive hatebase besides being trans
and really
cringe.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't know much about him, but I think it is mostly the cringe.
Perhaps also that with his 'Day x of Being a Girl' he's being blatant that he was living out a caricature of womanhood, but from the gay theatre kid perspective rather than the neurodivergent incel perspective. Like he essentially remade himself into a 24/7 drag queen, didn't even change his name, but should now be considered a genuine woman.
But it's probably just that he's incredibly cute twinky and cringe and annoying and basic.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I just see him compared to people like serial
killers and cult leaders a lot and just wonder
if they're talking
about the same train. Because I don't remember him actually
doing anything
besides taking a sponsorship(get that bag queen).
As far as being "sociopathic" I'm pretty
sure that's just part of
ing out because women
are sociopaths.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I wouldn't comment on Mulvaney except he has to be at least a narcissist, but I meant Philosophy Tube/Olly Thorn is a sociopath.
But yes, I don't know much about Mulvaney except he looks incredibly annoying. I think he's regarded as a skinwalker as well, but unlike Thorn skinwalking Contrapoints Dylan's skinwalking a generic femininity.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So he passes?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
On that scale, emotionally, a lot of trains pass. Just not the rest of them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Opinion discarded
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Source?!?!?!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
For what
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I have to watch every episode contratube puts out because its such a disaster
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Snapshots:
https://x.com/inxlings/status/1890806713004982514:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context