emoji-award-rape
emoji-award-purplegrape
Unable to load image

:marseytrumpgenocide: Not hiring drumph supporters. :omgeerie:

https://old.reddit.com/r/AskHR/comments/1iwg6z6/or_not_hiring_trump_supporters/

								

								

:#marseymagarentfree:

Good corpojanny/women of size HR bait thread.

I wish you the outcome you deserve for hiring people just like you!

A workplace full of compassionate and caring people!

That's a way to spin it. πŸ™„

The truth? People who actually care about their fellow humans and didn't vote for someone who is gleefully making the lives of women & immigrants & queer people worse? People who don't make excuses about their party's representatives doing Nazi salutes and advocating for dismantling the constitution by letting Tr*mp run for a third term? Yeah, that's the kind of place I want to work. Not where people yell about immigrants but don't give a shit about Elon or Melania. Racism and hate aren't patriotic.

:#marseysnoo:

Yikes, as someone who could really give a flying frick about the government or any parties, judging people by their political beliefs is honestly fricked up. Kind of like judging them on their religious beliefs and so on. I truly hope you get caught doing this and get canned lol

Yeh, never gave a crap about my coworkers or friends being liberal. Everyone's lives and struggles are different.....different struggles shape beliefs and morals. Dont know how someone with any moral terpitude can even think like this.

Trump? Morals? πŸ€£πŸ€£πŸ€£πŸ€£πŸ’€

Anybody who supports that man is either completely amoral or deeply confused.

Where did I say trump?

The post is about not hiring trump supporters, my dude. It's right up there in the post.

:#marseypooner:

Conservative here and neither I nor anybody conservative associates on LinkedIn post or up vote any political comments.

But you have at it.

The idea that one can judge "gullibility" by political party is truly idiotic. The party of "he's fine, he's sharp, he outthinks me" that flips to "he's too senile" after a single evening telling anyone else at all they are too gullible is just deliciously stupid.

If you are referring to Biden, it wasn't just the debate. It was 4 years of watching his decline. Look up the signs and symptoms of dementia.

Anyone who looks at Trump and believes he is in the same physical and /or mental/cognitive condition as Biden might have dementia themselves

:#marseyboomer:

This is messed up and wrong.

To the contrary, it's sensible. Think about it.

No it's not. It's wrong, otherwise OP would have no problem revealing more information. He knows it's not ok thus he hides info. IDGAF about who my team voted for, they had their reasons to do so, and I'm not a self appointed judge to hire or fire them based on political affiliations.

Do you Facebook? Because I have many Facebook friends. Mostly progressive. But the few conservative friends who are on my Facebook believe absolutely EVERYTHING. They're constantly talking about how people are putting fentanyl on objects to poison you, or don't smell that perfume in the parking lot, or Facebook is going to use your pictures unless you post this wall of text. They are so gullible. Even when I try to explain to them to use their critical thinking skills; they're just so goddarn gullible. I don't want people like that working for me

:#marseysipping:

What kind of person wants to go out of their way to hire bigots, nazis, and morons?

:#marseyraging:

Social pretexting is a red team tool I support πŸ’― to harden asset protections. πŸ†Ethics for compliance, anti-bribery, anti-corruption, and conflicts of interest are other human asset protections for your consideration:

1)Digitally and physically post the companies public value statements is a very effective way to govern corporate culture along with the OSHA, EEO, FMLA, FLSA EPPA, and Wage posters.

2)Another governing tool is using project implicit testing created by the great Vernā Myers (Follow on LinkedIn) with your companies annual training for safety, security, and privacy awareness. Studies find that by publishing corporate ethos the culture desired flourishes and the reason many are refusing to dismiss DEI programs.

I am working on an emotional intelligence program to identify team weaknesses before a hostile work environment suks critical skills out of successful business operations by elevating chaos and distraction.

:#chadindianheadset:

It's a pretty gross position to take! Sure a small amount of supports might actually post on LinkedIn but I would think twice about hiring anyone who posted massive support for any controversial take on LinkedIn because it should be a professional platform. If you can't separate personal opinions from business (regardless of who you support) you have an issue.

Who you support politically should never have any impact on business decisions and I would argue that you are no better than the people you are discriminating against. I say this as someone who's normally politically neutral and is very nervous about the current political climate. Your hiring discrimination might not be illegal but it screams unprofessional and I wouldn't want to work for you regardless of my voting record…

I don't need gullible people dragging my team down though so I'll continue down this path.

I basically just said that I wouldn't hire anyone who spoke out on social media, especially LinkedIn, regarding any controversial opinion that could show they are outwardly aggressive, gullible or otherwise easily manipulated. That would include inappropriate posts about Trump/Elon, Biden, BLM, Pride Month, Nazis, the disabled, abortion or anything else that has NO business in the workplace.

By limiting your opinion to Trump supporters only you are including a HUGE number of people who are also gullible and incapable of critical thinking on the other side of the board as well. You should reconsider applying your position to anyone who's controversial - not just Trump.

:#marseymad:

Listen, the MAGA crowd would have no issue in discriminating against me in the hiring process, so frick em.

I'm sure someone else will chime in with a real answer, but as far as I'm concerned you're in the right, my friend.

Not to mention, there is a clause within Project 2025 that the way I interpreted it is that they want to make it legal for people of a particular faith and who have a moral objection to homosexuality, to legally discriminate against gay people. So the bakery discrimination on steroids!!!

Just wow. Luckily, I work for respected company that prohibits this kind of behavior and we are encouraged to report any type of intolerance whether it's against sexual and gender minorities, as well as even people of faith. Even though it's a very progressive company, they always ensure that people of faith are respected and protected (as long as they don't disrespect others who work alongside them who aren't of the same beliefs and/or proselytize in the workplace, and to be honest, no one should be discussing religion or politics in the workplace anyhow).

:#marsey69:

People post about trump on LinkedIn?

Idiots

I'm honestly shocked about it. I have so many sales stalkers on LinkedIn maybe that's why I see so much of it I think Trump is more popular with sales folks.

I'm a "sales folx" and I have only ever seen 1 guy post about far right politics (not even trump) and he never moved up

Only a true clown would post politics cuz you alienate 50% of the population

:#marseythinkorino:

There are no federal protections against this. Your local state or city may. California, New York, DC, Washington, and Oregon have limiting policies, some before employment, some after. And the federal government has prohibitions against this for federal positions.

I am commenting only in direct and limited response to your question.

Thank you for the info!

Just claim hiring them would be a DEI hire as there are many cognitive issues that would prevent them from being able to fulfill their duties

lol another comment recommended this too

:#platytired:

live SPS reaction:

https://old.reddit.com/r/ShitPoliticsSays/comments/1iws0uu/not_hiring_trump_supporters/

90
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

tbh someone stupid enough to have their political opinions publicly available for HR ladies to see probably shouldn't be hired anyway

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

True, but they're not talking about not hiring anyone who overshares on LinkedIn, are they. You're completely correct that anyone who uses it as a place to talk about politics of any kind should be treated as the biggest of red flags.

I did like that a recurring theme in the replies were echoing the OP saying Trump supporters were too gullible to hire. They kept comparing them to progressives, who to them clearly only believed the truth and never fell for anything fake. It makes the idea that it's bait even better.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

prog tards are def gullible but trumpers are a different breed.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://media.tenor.com/SAOjrutVyV8AAAAx/taskmaster-greg-davies.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I just hire based solely on race and use politics as a pretext for that

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Same.

(My policy is to not hire minorities)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I manage a department that has office, field and shop staff. The office used to be 100% women. I hired two Chinese women who barely speak English to sanitize equipment in the shop so that HR wouldn't notice that I've converted the office to 80% male.

They're great. They get their work done, never whine about politics at work, and never talk to HR. :marseywholesome:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't discriminate against race but I do discriminate against drug addicts. Black skin is fine but I'll never hire a black toothed junkie

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thats the same as race so i approve

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nah it mostly hits honkeys tbh

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

tbh someone stupid enough to have their political opinions publicly available for HR ladies to see probably shouldn't be hired anyway

I mean, it only counts against you if you're a rightoid.

Leftoids have also tried to push this further and make it so that failing to express these opinions will be held against you (if you fail to claim you're a leftoid you must be a rightoid), but traction has been mixed at best. This is eventually what diversity statements are, though - but they've only become common in universities.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>publicly praising the President of the United States

It's only bad if it's blumpffff. Praising big Mike's Kenyan bussy boy is heckin holesum :#marseyserioushatfact:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.