Reported by:
- Aba : Truth nuke
- pet : i love lil Z. kill all ziggers
-
of_blood_and_salt
:
-
0BS
:
babushka does not approve do to the 'dignity of her motherland'
- TotalVatniggerDeath : TOTAL VATBIPOC DEATH
COMMUNITY NOTED
Zelensky is a little shit
Community Note by @BimothyX2
Israel is great. Expect a jewish beeper in your future.
Helpful [90] Not Helpful [20]- 184
- 64
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i can't believe those fricking magats are supporting the mass killing of europeans by wanting the war to end. it's ridiculous!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Remind me what happened the last time Ukraine agreed to a ceasefire? And let's not pretend like MAGAtards haven't developed a genuine hatred for Ukraine and a genuine love for Russia, even a year ago you had Tucker Carlson interviewing Putin and fawning over Russia. As a white supremacist first and foremost, it blows my fricking mind that r-slurred boomercons have been duped into supporting Putin sending hundreds of thousands of his men to die for nothing and blame it on the invaded country
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ukraine was saved from collapse and there was peace for 8 years until they decided to request to join NATO.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Russia wasn't ready to invade in 2014, their army was a mess, they built it up over those 8yrs, did tons of training exercises and got experience in Syria
They were 100% wanting to do it during the civil war when Ukraine would have collapsed easy but held back
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Russia didn't really want to invade in 2022 either, but then Ukraine applied to join NATO, which is one of the few red lines Russia has.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They didn't apply to NATO until after the war?
Also it was formal Ukraine policy to not want to join NATO since 2010 and they didn't change their position until Russia invaded Crimea in 2014
NATO, specifically Germany and France, had also pushed back on them joining since 2008 to placate Russia. That policy didn't change until 2022 post invasion
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No. Ukraine held elections, and the president who won didn't want to side with NATO and liked Russia. So, all the leftoids and far rightoids protested and shut down the capital. Eventually, the government started shooting people to clear them out, so more joined the protest, and their democratically elected president was deposed. You even had the likes of John Kerry and other US politicians going to the crowd and essentially saying, yes yes sow more chaos.
It's not surprising how Russia reacted to what is essentially a coup.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
no, that's the democratic political form of civil disobedience. annexing a country is far more similar to a coup then the people protesting something they don't like.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're r-slurred.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Maybe "applied" was the wrong word to use, but Zelenskyy approved a new national security strategy in 2020, whose goal was membership in NATO. Then they started participating in NATO exercises and in 2021, during the Brussels summit, NATO clearly stated that they intend to have Ukraine join them.
Which they only did after Ukraine illegally ousted their pro-Russian president because he refused to sign a deal with the EU in favor of a deal with Russia.
As I said, the Brussels 2021 summit clearly stated that they plan on Ukraine joining them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
that's a long post
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's three sentences
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
two too long
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
So you are saving them from dying in war by making them surrender?
There are valid reasons to be against sending arms, but the one you present sounds r-slurred.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i hope the war continues so long that both countries stop existing
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context