frick it i'm pizzashill posting now
Reported by:
- Arran : cuck take
- Citro : While true, you are also gay
-
whyareyou
:
- SrdinianTourist : Anyone who disagrees with this is a wingcuck beyond repair
-
TheOverBeether
: yeah, okay, cute twink.
-
JadeStalk
: I liked
drama meta more
- Account_109_ : What happened? Im 2 lazy to read the thread
-
Sphereserf3232
: Are you ok?
- SixthDragonBall : Too many concerned redditors here
- TransLiesMatter : What's the deal with cute twinks sucking Jew peepee?
If any of you think Trump/Vance's meltdown in the oval office was based, you're unironically r-slurred or Russian
- 310
- 187
Top Poster of the Day:
911roofer
Current Registered Users: 31,258
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
From what a pragmatic standpoint, what's the difference?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Only that accusing them of being russian assets just makes them dig in their heels even more and is ultimately futile.
It would be more effective to call out that they're idiots getting duped and that they actually hurt the US. Attack their political decisions, not their motivation.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
How is it hurting the US to focus on its problems instead of anyone else's?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The argument there is spending $1 to weaken Russia by $10 is a good investment since they are still our geopolitical enemy and would gladly do the same to us.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm sorry, but are we looking at the same videos of the "war" that Russia is engaged in?
They may be our geopolitical enemy, but we don't need to spend limitless amounts of money for them to fail.
They're doing that quite well on their own and are of zero physical threat to the USA.
Cyberattacks are another matter entirely and are State agnostic.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We don't need to spend limitless money for them to fail. We just need to spend a fraction of the amount we want them to fail by. I think it's also fair to bully Europe into spending this money instead of the US.
And yes, despite all the talk, this war has clearly showed just how outclassed everyone else's military is. America steamrolled Iraq, a country on the other side of the world which by all estimates had a better equipped military than Ukraine. Russia had terrible keeping its military supplied next door.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So again.
No need to spend much money there.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We'll see how it shakes out, but if hurting Russia benefits the US and Europe doesn't step up their funding, then not spending this money is being penny wise and pound foolish.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The issue with European funding isn't the money, the EU have, can and will supply that. Its that through NATO they've been largely content with paying into the American protection racket, buying US arms and not forming deeper European defense cooperation through things like common procurement. (This is also because Germans are huge cucks)
The long and short of it is that the EU doesn't have the production capacity or stockpiles necessary to independently provide for Ukraine.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
One is treason and the other isn't?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context