Unable to load image

Supreme Court denies Trump administration request to cancel $2 billion in foreign aid :ashfellforitagain:

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5177420-supreme-court-blocks-trump-funding/

The Supreme Court in a 5-4 emergency ruling Wednesday refused to halt a judge's decision ordering the Trump administration to immediately release nearly $2 billion in foreign aid payments owed under existing contracts.

It hands a loss to the administration in the first time that Trump's efforts to drastically reshape federal spending, agency by agency, have reached the high court.

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined with the court's three liberals to side against the administration.

Four of the court's conservatives — Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh — dissented.

"Does a single district-court judge who likely lacks jurisdiction have the unchecked power to compel the Government of the United States to pay out (and probably lose forever) 2 billion taxpayer dollars? The answer to that question should be an emphatic 'No,' but a majority of this Court apparently thinks otherwise. I am stunned," Alito wrote, joined by the three others.

The Trump administration has broadly looked to dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), including by firing employees and freezing its payments to contractors, sparking a wave of lawsuits.

The Supreme Court's emergency decision keeps in place a lower judge's order enforcing his directive that the administration maintain foreign aid agreements that existed before Trump took office.

U.S. District Judge Amir Ali, an appointee of former President Biden, had found the Trump administration wasn't complying with his order to resume the unpaid USAID contracts and grants. Last week, Ali demanded the funds be released by the end of the following day.

"Given that the deadline in the challenged order has now passed, and in light of the ongoing preliminary injunction proceedings, the District Court should clarify what obligations the Government must fulfill to ensure compliance with the temporary restraining order, with due regard for the feasibility of any compliance timelines," reads the Supreme Court's unsigned order.

The Justice Department quickly went to the Supreme Court after Ali's order, warning the administration couldn't comply so rapidly and asking for an emergency intervention.

"The Executive Branch takes seriously its constitutional duty to comply with the orders of Article III courts," the Justice Department wrote in court filings. "The government is undertaking substantial efforts to review payment requests and release payments. Officials at the highest levels of government are engaged on this matter."

Chief Justice John Roberts received the request by default, just hours before last week's midnight deadline. He issued a brief delay until the court could hear from both sides.

Now that it has, the full court denied the administration's motion, refusing to maintain the freeze on the funding.

The group of USAID contractors suing warned they will soon shutter without access to the funds. They urged the justices to deny the government's application, saying the judge acted within his "sound discretion."

"The government comes to this Court with an emergency of its own making," their attorneys wrote.

!foidmoment

20
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sorry goy, the constitution says we can steal from your paycheck and give it to Africa.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It literally does lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But the executive branch controls the agency, so now they are forced to take the funds they will do nothing with?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseygigaretard:

The funds are for liabilities. E.g. payment to a company digging a well. Musk decided to withhold the funds that USAID has earmarked to pay that company. Which is not only pretty obviously violating congress' power of the purse, but is also a very simple contract violation. Like not paying the hooker after he blasted your bussy.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wow imagine bagholding sovereign debt of a country where the executive branch can't direct spending of its agencies lol.

They should redirect that two tril into shorting the treasury market and see if Powell will step in lol.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Amir Ali

What an American-sounding name :marseywholesome:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I mean if they already completed the work then they should be paid.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:quote: work :quote: but yeah it is kinda a bad look for USA to try to just NOT pay on completed contracts. Some people might argue it's on-brand for orangeman though :marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

woman moment

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

ACB has got to be worst mistake Frumpy ever made.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

She was engineered for one purpose, so it wouldn't be an all-moid majority overturning Roe v. Wade. She accomplished her goal and is now adrift

It would've been better if she actually got to write the decision

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

weird she seems more competent than his other picks and actually follows the law.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sorry rightoids, better pay up! And don't forget to leave an extra tip for the trouble!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.