https://kiwifarms.st/threads/the-charity.179965/page-13#post-20949187
Top Poster of the Day:
.webp?h=11 "Nuzzles, pounces on you, UwU, you're so warm!..")
Jattuph_Biscuits
Current Registered Users: 31,830
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah he ain't gonna be getting any favors here. On one hand that's why I like him, on the other, Lol, Lmao.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yeah a few months passed, i dont' think tromp or elun will do anything to protect their base from internet censorship or debanking, 2 things I figured were most important for future right wing leaders to be able to even be elected
I don't know how much longer can the right subside on avoiding ever-improving censors and ways of cancellation. I'm already seeing 'conservatives' cuck themselves too
Last time I went to a conservative groomercord and asked them why don't they use some other social media or service that doesn't impose censorship on them, so they don't have to toe the line every second. Half accused me of just wanting to say racist slurs and the other half just shrugged.
I mean sure I want to slur sometimes, but I also don't want my speech dictated by political enemies.. And most of the darn rightoids are now calling for banning porn or gloating about greenland. The libertarians are r-slurred and the leftists are evil. Kill me
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They're already chomping at the bit to do their own censorship/chilling as if that won't bite them in 4 years time.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah the porn bans and am i missing anything?
Rightoids are really r-slurred, and i thought things were dire enough for them to at least pretend to be pro- free speech a year or two after winning. But no, let's start censorsing before even dismantling the left wing censorship apparatus..
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
On the one hand, free speech
On the other hand, would you want to be the bank for Kiwi Farms?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I would because it's a reasonable line in the sand for the limits of freezepeaches but more importantly it's the tide that raises all ships like rdrama
if it goes totally dark our days are numbered
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is my primary problem with cancel culture. It's not enough to boycott someone.
You have to make it literally impossible for them to exist in society, aka cancel them.
But the term itself just doesn't sound as horrible as it actually is.
I regularly see family members get cancelled alongside the target too. Imagine your hubby says something a bit too spicy on the internet and now you, the wife can't own a bank account
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
"I see men getting cancelled all the time - have they considered how their actions affect actual people, like their wives?"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Usually their ahem partner supports them knowingly, which is a marriage goal i can only hope for
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
theres surely a difference between getting cancelled like that one indian guy aziz ansari and getting deplatformed. i think very few people fall into the second category compared to a social cancellation.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Even that is underselling it, deplatforming assumes there is an alternative, but what is usually done is when 1 thing deplatforms you, 100 others follow, and you become a hot potato.
For some, like in the case of gab, kiwifarms etc, it's nearly impossible to still function even after in-housing most of the things they lost from deplatforming (server hosting, ads, apps etc)
They are a completely legal company providing a completely legal service, that is near impossible to function because some things like banks can't just be in-housed without massive amounts of money and government approval
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Yes, it would be so fricking funny.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I truly don't understand, is Null seriously not able to just open an account under his own name or an LLC with a consumer bank in his country of origin (US or serb)? Like is he that far deplatformed?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
but unironically is that what happens?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah he mentioned a couple of times that when he attempts to make an account they tell him they can't but won't share info, then never reply to further communication attempts.
Feels illegal but apparently banks can do whatever the frick they want.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Anedot doesn't actually appear to be a bank as far as I can tell?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Swo much fwor the #Based #redpiwwed bank that likes guns and libtard tears.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Snapshots:
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/the-charity.179965/page-13#post-20949187:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Obviously they have been denied the basic human right of banking services (jewish freudian slip for Josh?) because they support free speech and this has nothing to do with how kf's only business consists of harassing and stalking mentally ill people online who are extremely litigious.
What bank would want such a high risk client that goes out of its way to attract more risk every day?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah that's totally all that they do. Kfers are innocent little princesses who didn't do nothing wrong. /s
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes, that's literally all they fricking do on the KF. What they do outside KF is literally not Null's problem.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sorry sweety but if you stalk someone and then give the dox to someone who commits wrongdoing with it, that's aiding and abetting. You should really educate yourself on what stochastic terrorism is.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're being ironic, which really ticks me off, because I would really like for this site to be completely unironic, cause that would be way more fun. So I'm gonna pretend that you're serious.
They're not giving anyone anything; they have found it publicly online and posted it there. What people do with it is not their responsibility. They are also not stalking anyone, as they are not interacting with them, but only watching from afar, which they are allowed to do
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's the definition of stalking.
It's called stochastic terrorism. It's no different then the redditors who post doge employees addresses online and go "teehee i hope no one commits acts of violence or harassment to this person!
"
This is just a cope kfers hide behind to avoid the consequences of their actions and so they can believe there's a massive government conspiracy trying to take them down for being the past bastion of freedom against the new world order when in reality it's because they're a stalker website that harasses and stalks people on the internet.
Like come on now, everything you're saying is completely disingenuous. Can you really not see how compiling all available information about someone in a thread specifically for hating them and celebrating whenever something bad happens to them (like being harassed directly on other websites) is a bad thing?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
None of this applies to KiwiFarms by a simple virtue of having an explicit "look but don't touch" rule. No one can prevent you from talking negatively about things that people post online. It's called the First Amendment. This would be like accusing journ*lists of stalking for uncovering public information about you, which then causes you negative consequences.
There is no such thing as stochastic terrorism. It's a meaningless term that woketards made up to explain why they should be exempt from criticism. Unless you can prove that the information posted was done so explicitly to harass somebody, you've got nothing. And you can't prove that because KiwiFarms explicitly forbids such behavior, bans anyone engaging in such behavior, and often makes them the target of its ridicule.
Again with this "harassment" nonsense. KiwiFarms doesn't permit harassment, and no amount of crying about what Kiwifarms users do off-website will change that.
"It's not free speech if you're mean about it" LMAO.
No, I don't think it's a bad thing.
Kamala4President: Unless those consequences is having a bunch of r-slurs talking negatively about you on some forum.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
lmao get real. Kfers find random trans people and furries and then make stalking threads where they wish death upon these people for people being different. Saying "we pinky swear we're not doing anything wrong!" is ridiculous cope. You know what you're doing, we know what you're doing, why lie about it? Is it some sort of delusional coping to convince yourself you're doing some heroic work to save society from the evil lgbtq+?
Screaming "we have plausible deniability!" as you are dragged kicking and screaming to gitmo doesn't change the fact that kfers openly wish for and celebrate the death and harassment of the people they stalk.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Freudian slip?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
simple
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's not how it works lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's never over
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context