Nondelegation doctrine is congress has to do their jobs and can't transfer responsibility for code to agencies. Basically a CFR can't exceed regulatory burden of it's controlling USC.
I totally agree with this. Agencies should have a feedback mechanism to congress to propose rule changes not independent rulemaking, CFRs allow agencies to decide they don't like the law and ignore it. We already have parts of agencies configured like this, FDA drugs and a decent chunk of food regulation is set by congress with no wiggle for the FDA to make rules that are not simply clarifying process.
Chuds are all r-slurred though. They say things like:
The biggest tragedy to a judge is telling them they aren't kings.
The non-delegation doctrine is essential to dismantling the deep state. Failing to abide by this principle is blatantly unconstitutional. It's almost incomprehensible how much she sucks.
Wow. That's interesting that she doesn't want the will of the people carried out. How can one justify this.
Not recognizing it's a constraint on executive power. Nondelegation prevents congress transferring enumerated duties to the executive. Some of these include:
The Congress shall have Power... To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization
Executive has no authority to cancel visas, deport people without due process etc
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States
Executive has no authority to impose any tarrifs.
No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.
Executive has no authority to impound appropriated funds or prevent execution of functions congress has dictated.
Why are chuds so utterly r-slurred?
.webp?h=11 "Nuzzles, pounces on you, UwU, you're so warm!..")
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Federal regulations (Executive branch) are important because it takes a codified law and translates it into Who What When Where Why How. Assumption: we live in normal times and have smart people running the country.
The law says "protect national secrets" and you will see a much more verbose policy, procedure, and enforcement in place within federal agencies with how a SCIF is constructed, or how a normal space is converted to a SCIF, how clearances and SSBIs are conducted, etc.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
when was that even?Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Most countries do that via feedback.
US actually
sorta has this already via CRS and the interns/hacks who actually 
write 
the bills if they wanted to use it. Legislator states 
an intent, policy wonks turn that intent in to text and then legislators vote on the actual text of what's going 
to happen 
not merely intent.
They could also use agency feedback where
a vote establishes intent and then an agency has n months to turn intent in to policy which is returned to congress 
if they want to refuse/modify. Probably the best example of where 
that occurs today 
is federal 
sentencing guidelines. https://www.ussc.gov/ make recommendations that become law if congress 
don't override them. Most parliamentary systems use that, agencies propose 
changes to the law to parliament.
What happens today
is congress 
modifies USC and then agencies find loopholes to exploit if they don't like the law. JOBS act relaxed 
accreditation requirements for IPO investment (so non-rich people could invest 
in IPOs) but SEC didn't like that so they updated rules 
in a way that effectively retained the existing restrictions.
I am very much in favor of technocratic rule making but what we have right
now isn't even remotely that, political 
appointees decide what they want reality to be and that is what becomes the CFRs. Having a feedback loop that prevents agencies deciding shit for themselves without a relief 
valve 
seems like the least bad way to address the issue with this form of government.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
No its tyrrany for congresspeople to not write specific acceptable thresholds for drinking water contaminants, EMF radiation standards for smartphones, car seat impact test procedures, and medical waste handling protocols themselves
We elected the finest minds in our nation to decide these things and for them to delegate to so-called experts is how we got into this whole mess in the first place
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I can't tell which is the sarcastic part and in which direction anymore
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It is central to democracy that congresspeople themselves write and maintain aviation safety standards, test protocols, and inspection schedules.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Standards yes, that's normal and reasonable. Maybe test protocols depending on what you mean. Schedules yes.
You can say that your product/service needs to adhere to parameters, and that the test and evaluation for your product also needs to meet standards as well. But you can't -- and shouldn't -- dictate how to arrive to it, because you severely limit the technology used in each case to a single type of technology from a specific era.
Example: You can say that a new military gas mask filter needs to protect a soldier for X amount of hours, against ABCDEFG chemicals, and Z levels of concentrations, and similar qualifications for the material against liquid chemicals. You can say that the testing appartus has to maintain the desired test parameters for the duration of the test. You can say that the data needs to meet statistical validity, needs to use positive and negative laboratory controls, that a chain of custody has to be used, that you follow QAQC procedures, that you maintain your GCMS to certain standards.
But you should honestly let creative scientists and engineers meet your requirements, not follow a prescribed blueprint.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is how you get FEMA death camps, cuck
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context