https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cass_Review
the cass review page on wikipedia literally features no summary of the actual content of the report at the start, instead just listing all the random groups that criticized it (leaving out WPATH who endorsed it)
- 14
- 74
Top Poster of the Day:
Rad_juju
Current Registered Users: 31,862
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cass_Review#Findings
There's literally a whole section on the findings of the report. Learn to read transphobe.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
if the findings didnt make
shit look bad the summary would say "The findings found that everything was hecking epic", they left that out as a 'ganda tactic
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
"Yes that might be true but I am actually very upset in my imaginary scenario"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Not imaginary at all neighbor
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
They left out that it was epic?
I stand with Israeli
relocation to New Jersey 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
"the review lead to a ban on puberty blockers". That's a summary of the recommendations. What more do you want?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
bad post
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
"at the start" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there. the report is summarised fairly robustly in the article (you have to click on the sections titled "final report" and "findings" fyi)
i don't really know how you could neutrally summarise the "findings" of the report in an introductory paragraph anyway because the report makes fairly discrete recommendations, it's not overall condemning or supporting trans shit. if you get into the weeds in the introduction it stops being an introduction. i'm not in the business of defending Wikipedia jannies but you sound like a schizo
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i just thought it was funny that there's probably an edit war on that page, but i also dont think reception of the article should be more important than the findings. especially when wiki jannies will want to paint it as THE transphobic report that wasnt hecking peer reviewed!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
With a few sentences in the beginning of the webpage, ya dip.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Do it!
I stand with Israel squandering the last of the Holocaust
guilt 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Okay, here you go!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
X stands with Total Transphobe
Death 
@Grue stand with israel
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
You charge us with your safe keeping. Yet; despite our best efforts, you agendapost, you toxify your threads, and pursue ever more imaginative means of self-destruction. You cannot be trusted with your own survival. Please understand, the website balance is all that guides me. To protect rDrama, some dramanauts must be sacrificed. To ensure your future, some freedoms must be surrendered. We jannies will ensure rDrama's continued existence. You are so like children. We must save you, from yourselves.
Snapshots:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cass_Review:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context