Luigi Mangione's lawyer lets loose on the federal government: "They are defending the broken, immoral, and murderous healthcare industry that continues to terrorize the American people."
https://old.reddit.com/r/WorkReform/comments/1jqks4m/luigi_mangiones_lawyer_lets_loose_on_the_federal/
- 149
- 72
Top Poster of the Day:
J
Current Registered Users: 31,877
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I know you're just playing around, but I really hoped you read that one.
I even gave you an upmarsey every time, and you gave me nothing in return.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I did read it.
It's just the same rehashed argument Apple makes to try to keep people from replacing the batteries in their chinkshit phones.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
But this ain't chinkshit. There's much more on the line, and Apple also has every right to have authorized repair people.
If you forced them to not to do this, then they'd simply reduce the scope of their warranties because they'd have no say in who can actually repair these products.
Then, as Eurobeans do, you could force the company to extend their warranty to 2 years or 5, so all the company would do is raise their price to cover the foreseeable loss.
I'm not sure why leftoids have zero understanding of the real world.
!anticommunists !freemarket, the commie gave me pets, so I decided to bite his hand. It's cat logic.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sorry but i'm pro right to repair - locked obselescance is commie shit !freemarket
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It isn't real. Nor is forced obsolescence (
).
It's a dumb myth perpetuated by commies.
!anticommunists, we must PURGE these people and their forced obsolescence myth.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!anticommunists This fricking commie is gaslamping meeee1!!!!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What the frick,
@kaamrev!? 
I will unilaterally DESTROY you and Israel, if you do not upmarsey me.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What have I not upmarseyed
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
A lot of the specific examples they cite are myths, like the light bulb bullshit, but you can't pretend it never ever happens at all. One obvious example being that you can't replace the battery in your phone anymore. I'm sure there's legit technical reasons for it, but c'mon. I don't even the option of buying a thicker phone with a removable battery.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I can, and any repair shop can. People wanted a slimmer phone, and so the company supplied them.
If anything, you should denounce all the consumers. 
That linux Pine phone, or whatever it's called, but you pay double for the same hardware.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
This is blatantly false and evident in how long phones get software updates and app stop working on older oses
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There's a price for every product. Deal with it.
And if you buy cheap shit, you get shit results, which is deserved.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Bro forgot about Apple.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh great, another commie.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!anticommunists
A commie has infiltrated our ranks and anti-commie posting in bad faith
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
This. it's not a free market when only a handful authorized buttholes can charge you moon prizes. Bad
@Ubie take 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, it costs like $20 more.
The problem with you BIPOCs is that none of you understand the unintended outcomes of your favorite policies (of forcing people to do whatever you want). They would reduce the scope and duration of their warranties. If that was also forced by government to not do so, they'd raise their price (and sell less, so they'd have to layoff some people). Your mindset is completely contrary to the principle of liberty because socialists are a bunch of short-sighted BIPOCs who love the idea of unicorn government with zero consequences. When will you r-slurs grow up? Freedom doesn't mean "I get free shit forced by government at the expense of everyone else because I believe I should."
!freemarket, the socialist doesn't understand what he's babbling about.
!anticommunists, we REALLY need a PURGE SOON!
(Upmarsey me,
@UraniumDonGER, or I'll take back some of my upmarseys for you.... 
)
Oh, of course, Redwee downmarseys me.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!metashit Ubie is threatening to go full nuclear by retroactively sidevoting.
Will the
worldrDrama community really let this aggression go unchecked?Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
All neolib takes are bad.
They love getting butt fricked dry as long as it's the private sector doing it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This nig ain't a neolib but a lolbertarian
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Even worse.
But do lolberts simp for intellectual property?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I agree tor luxury consumer goods but not for cancer diagnostic equipment.
Your phone slowing down versus losing 10% detection capability are two very different things.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Shitlibs only believe in freedoms for corporations.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I wouldn't trust a 3rd party to fix a gas chromatograph or NMR, let alone cancer diagnostic equipment.
If the manufacturer is responsible for equipment bring as accurate as advertised, and the doctor is responsible for using it and diagnosing patients correctly, then you'd either need to heavily regulate the training of 3rd party servicers, or simply allow the manufacturer to be the one to do maintenance.
As for medical patents -- if you spend half a billion dollars developing a drug and then allow everyone else in the chemical industry to start profiting from it, then you will always operate at a net loss. If we don't want to permit patents for drugs, then the American People as a whole (the government) needs to recompense and reward the developers for their research before letting everyone else start making it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
But it's already regulated through the contract which specifies that only authorized repair companies can be used: otherwise, blah blah blah.
The market already solved the problem, but !commies are too narrow-minded.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
They're free to void warranties, however, they have to be able to prove that the unauthorized attempt to repair the device actually caused damage. It makes sense, if you do the repair by the book and use the same parts they do, they shouldn't be able to use that to weasel out of covering the device under warranty when something else breaks later down the line.
Sure, but they also don't have a right to prevent third-parties from repairing their devices.
The video addresses this, but you can make this exact argument against people repairing their cars as well. I don't see people arguing for automakers to have the exclusive right to repair their cars.
A real free market strag should recognize that limiting competition in the repair market leads to higher costs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sure, that's what court is for. You already have that right, and it's good that you have to spend money to do so (unless you win). Can't have leeches exploiting the judicial system, can we?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Corporations should be able to do whatever they want!
You people just love the taste of boot.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
"You have to spend all the money to develop a drug and then let everyone else make money off your invention! You have to invent cancer diagnostic equipment and let random people perform maintenance on them! And if they break them and you get sued for the device not detecting cancer, you have to allow lawyers who don't know anything to prove that it was the 3rd party repair man!"
"Then inventing things isn't worth the hassle."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Half of pharmaceutical funding already comes from the government.
Independent BMETs have credentials and certifications, you aren't just hiring some rando off the street.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Now, you're just being silly.
(Give me an upmarsey, or I'll be forced to remove those I gave to you.
)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context