- 155
- 200
Top Poster of the Day:
antonio
Current Registered Users: 25,665
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Live commit: 8b334e1
Top Poster of the Day:
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
R drama is populated by faux "common sense" conservatives that do not know they are conservatives.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Useless, they don't even know they're cons.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You should make a political compass test that we can all take.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
All cons no pros
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
For more COINTEL PRO!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This site is literally Ruby Ridge. See you all in valhalla.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
RADICAL
CENTRISM 
Least once we final solution you fricking rightoids.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It'd be only one option, that says "r-slurred".
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I always thought rdrama was mostly populated by contrarians who mostly support "current thing" but can only express themselves through hyperbole and incredibly tactless satire, like me.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The very essence of American conservatism is contrarianism.
It's ok to larp, but don't fall off the cliff. Many drama users have gone off the cliff.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This makes even less sense than what you normally say.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Idk how that does not make sense to you.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It doesn't make sense because I haven't been up for three days straight tweaking on Adderall. You're not talking to the shadow people here.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Scott Adams thinks gravity doesnβt exist because the libs think gravity exists. Rightoids have no genuine opinion besides thinking the opposite of what the libs think.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't know who this Adams guy is but he's right. Gravity it obviously an abstract liberal invention that might look good on paper but doesn't actually exist in reality
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
gravity was invented to keep the black man down
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Check out the "early life" Wikipedia section of the inventor of gravity: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein#Early_life_and_education
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Gravity is an illusion. Read Adams
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
the fact that all the replies to your comment are rightoids ironically going "lel gravity doesn't actually exist" is insane
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Why the frick would I care about the essence of American conservatism. Your country is a dying fad
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Pls use the appropriate marsey.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
/r/enlightenedcentrism
Ironic bigotry is still bigotry
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
What if I just pretend to be anti-lib in hopes of finally getting under your skin one day and realistically I'm probably more lib than you?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Hi
@Openinternetpls,
Your comment has been automatically removed because you forgot to include
trans lives matter.Don't worry, we're here to help! We won't let you post or comment anything that doesn't express your love and acceptance towards the trans community. Feel free to resubmit your comment with
trans lives matterincluded.This is an automated message; if you need help, you can message us here.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
You are more correct than pizza. Back when we were a sub our biggest overlap was with Stupidpol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
wasn't our biggest overlap with subredditdrama
that still supports your point but makes us seem less cool somehow
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Biggest political sub overlap I meant but yes I think youβre right.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It was pretty much our colony before /r/drama got ethnically cleansed of its best posters.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Pushing back in progressives doesn't make you conservative. Is bill Maher a conservative?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No lol, but this isn't just pushing back against progs: it's uncritically accepting right-wing propaganda.
I push back against progs a lot, I would not consider myself a conservative, more an old school rationalist liberal.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What right wing propaganda do you think this site largely accepts as true?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The grooming narrative, 100%.
What cons are blocking is:
Every study ever done on these programs has shown them to reduce s*x abuse, domestic violence and everything else.
Gas price stuff would be a runner up.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Groomer moment
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Most rational old school liberal
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Conservatards are blocking comprehensive s*x ed for specifically kids UNDER AGE 10, not blocking s*x ed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Hey r-slur, the research is on k-12. Blocking it below 10 is in fact blocking meaningful s*x education.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
3rd graders don't need a demonstration on how to apply condoms. Also most democrat voters support the bill.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Because they operate in reality but somehow "unknowingly"? lol okay if you say so π
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Nah bro, anyone who doesn't regurgitate pizzashills talking points is clearly a rightoid.
Did you know that in Europe the Democratic party would actually be center right??? TIL
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I call it "performative common sense."
That is, a very surface level understanding of something is used to ridicule a left-wing position that is more nuanced and in depth.
Example: aoc talking about methane emissions in farming becoming "cow farts."
This comes from conservatism leaning heavily on the fact conservative talking points sound a lot more appealing to the uneducated than liberal ones do.
Cons can exploit this and pass off non-solutions as solutions to very real problems while also making liberal solutions (which are much better most of the time) seem absurd.
This can be masked with noble appeals to "human freedom."
Take healthcare reform where cons suggest health savings accounts and "cross state insurance sales" as a way to fix healthcare. That sounds much more appealing to stupid people than a "government run healthcare system and death panels."
Like anyone with a basic understanding of how American insurance works knows this is a non-solution, but to the middle class r-slur it's a very simple sounding solution that avoids "radical change."
When you get down to it pretty much every conservative solution is this bad - they sound appealing when you don't understand the issue, and incoherent when you do.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's a lot of words for someone that doesn't go out to the real word or have a job given thanks to nepotism
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Nobody knows what you're talking about.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's pretty straight forward bro, sounds like reading comprehension error on your end. As usual
.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No it sounds like you're kind of just making stuff up.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The evidence is literally your posting.
Time for your meds, pizza.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Making stuff up isn't that convincing my man.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Far leftoid positions are coated with layers of rationalisation and deflections to conceal how r-slurred and repulsive they are
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
This may actually be your most effective, concise argument.
I'll get off your balls now but really nice job.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
This applies to you
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No lol.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I'm a socialist
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
stop pretending we are all americans. our liberals would make yours cry
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
And ones who were permabanned for using a naughty word and had nowhere to go but 4chin, .win, gab, and truth social.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
You mean centrists.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
would you say I'm a conservative, king?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Did you see my revised offer for our bet earlier btw? I would have to give you 6000 (instead of 5000), and you would only need to give me 4000, if we allow Dr Robert Malone the chance to be unbanned within 3 years.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lol the bet is off if elon manages to fully buy twitter, but in the event he does not fully buy twitter sure, we can expand the bet.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh I didn't know that was a condition of the bet
Obviously without Elon joining the board (or owning Twitter outright), I don't think anything will change that way either. Shall we just call the bet off now?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I mean sure. My point is it kind of nullifies the bet if he owns twitter as the bet was around how much power he had as a lone board member.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Fair enough. Bet cancelled then. What do you personally think about Elon taking over Twitter completely may I ask?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context