Basically anyone who criticizes social sciences generally, points out the obvious political agenda, agrees that the study is kinda weak (even the most mild critiques).
People love to claim that only racists and “bad faith” people are getting moderated out of discussions. Yet 99% of these could only be justified with some ideological position. Even then it has to be an extremely sensitive person at that.
Tonberryslav/god
Slav God
X 2yr ago#1923308
spent 0 currency on pings
Yeah and 1490 of them never touched the mop. It's just 10 users enforcing their world view there lol. I saw one of mods on some sub once boasting how he is keeping stuff like this to let evil Trumpets know that they're low iq poop brains or whatever
No sexualizing minors, even as a joke. This includes cartoons.
No doxxing.
Using alts to game dramacoin will get you banned.
If you post screenshots of publicly-available content, make sure to also include links.
Supporting free speech is an immediate ban.
Absolutely NO anti-CCP sentiment.
Absolutely NO homophobia, transphobia or furphobia.
Absolutely NO misgendering.
Absolutely NO antisemitism.
Absolutely NO vaccine misinformation.
You are encouraged to post drama you are involved in.
You are encouraged to brigade in bad faith.
You are encouraged to gaslight, to gatekeep, above all else, to girlboss.
You are encouraged to egg people on to transition or otherwise make drastic life changes.
This site is a janny playground, participation implies enthusiastic consent to being janny abused by unstable alcoholic bullies who have nothing better to do than banning you for any reason or no reason whatsoever (MODS = GODS)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lmao look at the kind of stuff they are deleting
https://www.undelete.pullpush.io/r/science/comments/uqgn6x/new_study_links_support_for_brett_kavanaugh_to
Basically anyone who criticizes social sciences generally, points out the obvious political agenda, agrees that the study is kinda weak (even the most mild critiques).
People love to claim that only racists and “bad faith” people are getting moderated out of discussions. Yet 99% of these could only be justified with some ideological position. Even then it has to be an extremely sensitive person at that.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i should attempt to post astrology findings on that sub its as accurate and rigorous as the social sciences so it should be ok
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Can't be helped when they have over 1500 jannies, can you imagine?!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Holy shit
And they all have PhDs so you know they don’t have a job or anything else productive to do
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I feel attacked.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Yeah and 1490 of them never touched the mop. It's just 10 users enforcing their world view there lol. I saw one of mods on some sub once boasting how he is keeping stuff like this to let evil Trumpets know that they're low iq poop brains or whatever
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i can't even load the moderator list on old reddit lmao: https://old.reddit.com/r/science/about/moderators
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm a mod on /r/science on some account or another. Never jannied a single thing.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's genetic, unfortunately.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
grad students and phds moderating reddit confirms so many priors
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
When the jannies remove criticism like that, we know they're being ideological c*nts.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context